Literature DB >> 26343836

Phasic dopamine release induced by positive feedback predicts individual differences in reversal learning.

Marianne Klanker1, Tessa Sandberg2, Ruud Joosten2, Ingo Willuhn3, Matthijs Feenstra3, Damiaan Denys3.   

Abstract

Striatal dopamine (DA) is central to reward-based learning. Less is known about the contribution of DA to the ability to adapt previously learned behavior in response to changes in the environment, such as a reversal of response-reward contingencies. We hypothesized that DA is involved in the rapid updating of response-reward information essential for successful reversal learning. We trained rats to discriminate between two levers, where lever availability was signaled by a non-discriminative cue. Pressing one lever was always rewarded, whereas the other lever was never rewarded. After reaching stable discrimination performance, a reversal was presented, so that the previously non-rewarded lever was now rewarded and vice versa. We used fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to monitor DA release in the ventromedial striatum. During discrimination performance (pre-reversal), cue presentation induced phasic DA release, whereas reward delivery did not. The opposite pattern was observed post-reversal: Striatal DA release emerged after reward delivery, while cue-induced release diminished. Trial-by-trial analysis showed rapid reinstatement of cue-induced DA release on trials immediately following initial correct responses. This effect of positive feedback was observed in animals that learned the reversal, but not in 'non-learners'. In contrast, neither pre-reversal responding and DA signaling, nor post-reversal DA signaling in response to negative feedback differed between learners and non-learners. Together, we show that phasic DA dynamics in the ventromedial striatum encoding reward-predicting cues are associated with positive feedback during reversal learning. Furthermore, these signals predict individual differences in learning that are not present prior to reversal, suggesting a distinct role for dopamine in the adaptation of previously learned behavior.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive flexibility; Dopamine; Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry; Feedback learning; Reversal learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26343836      PMCID: PMC5650052          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  59 in total

1.  Real-time measurements of phasic changes in extracellular dopamine concentration in freely moving rats by fast-scan cyclic voltammetry.

Authors:  Paul E M Phillips; Donita L Robinson; Garret D Stuber; Regina M Carelli; R Mark Wightman
Journal:  Methods Mol Med       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Putting a spin on the dorsal-ventral divide of the striatum.

Authors:  Pieter Voorn; Louk J M J Vanderschuren; Henk J Groenewegen; Trevor W Robbins; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Contributions of striatal dopamine signaling to the modulation of cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Martin Darvas; Richard D Palmiter
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Executive dysfunction in substance dependent individuals during drug use and abstinence: an examination of the behavioral, cognitive and emotional correlates of addiction.

Authors:  Antonio Verdejo-García; Antoine Bechara; Emily C Recknor; Miguel Pérez-García
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Reward-predictive cues enhance excitatory synaptic strength onto midbrain dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Garret D Stuber; Marianne Klanker; Bram de Ridder; M Scott Bowers; Ruud N Joosten; Matthijs G Feenstra; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Electrochemical, pharmacological and electrophysiological evidence of rapid dopamine release and removal in the rat caudate nucleus following electrical stimulation of the median forebrain bundle.

Authors:  J Millar; J A Stamford; Z L Kruk; R M Wightman
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1985-03-12       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Dorsal striatal D2-like receptor availability covaries with sensitivity to positive reinforcement during discrimination learning.

Authors:  Stephanie M Groman; Buyean Lee; Edythe D London; Mark A Mandelkern; Alex S James; Karen Feiler; Ronald Rivera; Magnus Dahlbom; Vesna Sossi; Eric Vandervoort; J David Jentsch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Phasic dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens symmetrically encodes a reward prediction error term.

Authors:  Andrew S Hart; Robb B Rutledge; Paul W Glimcher; Paul E M Phillips
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Restricting dopaminergic signaling to either dorsolateral or medial striatum facilitates cognition.

Authors:  Martin Darvas; Richard D Palmiter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  11 in total

1.  Contributions of nucleus accumbens dopamine to cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Anna K Radke; Adrina Kocharian; Dan P Covey; David M Lovinger; Joseph F Cheer; Yolanda Mateo; Andrew Holmes
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease.

Authors:  Milena Girotti; Samantha M Adler; Sarah E Bulin; Elizabeth A Fucich; Denisse Paredes; David A Morilak
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.067

3.  Potent Dopamine D2 Antagonists Block the Reward-Enhancing Effects of Nicotine in Smokers With Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Alexis E Whitton; Alan I Green; Diego A Pizzagalli; Robert M Roth; Jill M Williams; Mary F Brunette
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Striatum-related functional activation during reward- versus punishment-based learning in psychosis risk.

Authors:  Nicole R Karcher; Jessica P Y Hua; John G Kerns
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  The neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective.

Authors:  A Izquierdo; J L Brigman; A K Radke; P H Rudebeck; A Holmes
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Dopamine modulates individual differences in avoidance behavior: A pharmacological, immunohistochemical, neurochemical and volumetric investigation.

Authors:  Geiza Fernanda Antunes; Flavia Venetucci Gouveia; Fabiana Strambio Rezende; Midiã Dias de Jesus Seno; Milene Cristina de Carvalho; Caroline Cruz de Oliveira; Lennon Cardoso Tosati Dos Santos; Marina Correia de Castro; Mayra Akemi Kuroki; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; José Pinhata Otoch; Marcus Lira Brandao; Erich Talamoni Fonoff; Raquel Chacon Ruiz Martinez
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2020-04-08

7.  Mesolimbic dopamine projections mediate cue-motivated reward seeking but not reward retrieval in rats.

Authors:  Briac Halbout; Andrew T Marshall; Ali Azimi; Mimi Liljeholm; Stephen V Mahler; Kate M Wassum; Sean B Ostlund
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Dopamine D2-like receptor stimulation blocks negative feedback in visual and spatial reversal learning in the rat: behavioural and computational evidence.

Authors:  Johan Alsiö; Benjamin U Phillips; Júlia Sala-Bayo; Simon R O Nilsson; Teresa C Calafat-Pla; Arazo Rizwand; Jessica M Plumbridge; Laura López-Cruz; Jeffrey W Dalley; Rudolf N Cardinal; Adam C Mar; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Answering hastily retards learning.

Authors:  Yosuke Yawata; Kenichi Makino; Yuji Ikegaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Translational tests involving non-reward: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Benjamin U Phillips; Laura Lopez-Cruz; Lisa M Saksida; Timothy J Bussey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.