Shraddha Sapkota1, Sandra A Wiebe1,2, Brent J Small3, Roger A Dixon1,2. 1. Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 3. School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent research has linked psychological (personality) factors and specific genetic risk polymorphisms to performance on neurocognitive phenotypes. We examined whether episodic or semantic memory performance is associated with (a) three personality traits (i.e. neuroticism, extraversion, and openness to experience), (b) two neurodegenerative-related polymorphisms (i.e. Apolipoprotein E (APOE; rs7412; rs429358), Clusterin (CLU; rs11136000)), and (c) cross-domain risk interactions (magnification effects). METHODS: Linear growth models were examined to test independent associations between personality traits and declarative memory performance, and potential interaction effects with APOE and CLU genetic risk. Normal older adults (n = 282) with personality and genetic data from the Victoria Longitudinal Study were included at baseline and for up to 14 years of follow-up. RESULTS: First, we observed that higher openness to experience levels were associated with better episodic and semantic memory. Second, three significant gene × personality interactions were associated with poorer memory performance at baseline. These synergistic effects are: (a) APOE allelic risk (ε4+) carriers with lower openness to experience levels, (b) CLU (no risk: T/T) homozygotes with higher extraversion levels, and (c) CLU (no risk: T/T) homozygotes with lower neuroticism levels. CONCLUSIONS: Specific neurodegenerative-related genetic polymorphisms (i.e. APOE and CLU) moderate and magnify the risk contributed by selected personality trait levels (i.e. openness to experience, extraversion) on declarative memory performance in non-demented aging. Future research could target interactions of other personality traits and genetic polymorphisms in different clinical populations to predict other neurocognitive deficits or transitions to cognitive impairment and dementia.
OBJECTIVES: Recent research has linked psychological (personality) factors and specific genetic risk polymorphisms to performance on neurocognitive phenotypes. We examined whether episodic or semantic memory performance is associated with (a) three personality traits (i.e. neuroticism, extraversion, and openness to experience), (b) two neurodegenerative-related polymorphisms (i.e. Apolipoprotein E (APOE; rs7412; rs429358), Clusterin (CLU; rs11136000)), and (c) cross-domain risk interactions (magnification effects). METHODS: Linear growth models were examined to test independent associations between personality traits and declarative memory performance, and potential interaction effects with APOE and CLU genetic risk. Normal older adults (n = 282) with personality and genetic data from the Victoria Longitudinal Study were included at baseline and for up to 14 years of follow-up. RESULTS: First, we observed that higher openness to experience levels were associated with better episodic and semantic memory. Second, three significant gene × personality interactions were associated with poorer memory performance at baseline. These synergistic effects are: (a) APOE allelic risk (ε4+) carriers with lower openness to experience levels, (b) CLU (no risk: T/T) homozygotes with higher extraversion levels, and (c) CLU (no risk: T/T) homozygotes with lower neuroticism levels. CONCLUSIONS: Specific neurodegenerative-related genetic polymorphisms (i.e. APOE and CLU) moderate and magnify the risk contributed by selected personality trait levels (i.e. openness to experience, extraversion) on declarative memory performance in non-demented aging. Future research could target interactions of other personality traits and genetic polymorphisms in different clinical populations to predict other neurocognitive deficits or transitions to cognitive impairment and dementia.
Authors: Nicholas R Eaton; Robert F Krueger; Susan C South; Tara L Gruenewald; Teresa E Seeman; Brent W Roberts Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: G Peggy McFall; Sandra A Wiebe; David Vergote; David Westaway; Jack Jhamandas; Lars Bäckman; Roger A Dixon Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: L A Farrer; L A Cupples; J L Haines; B Hyman; W A Kukull; R Mayeux; R H Myers; M A Pericak-Vance; N Risch; C M van Duijn Journal: JAMA Date: 1997 Oct 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Li Juan Zheng; Yun Yan Su; Yun Fei Wang; U Joseph Schoepf; Akos Varga-Szemes; Jonathan Pannell; Xue Liang; Gang Zheng; Guang Ming Lu; Gui Fen Yang; Long Jiang Zhang Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2017-05-13 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Zander Crook; Tom Booth; Simon R Cox; Janie Corley; Dominika Dykiert; Paul Redmond; Alison Pattie; Adele M Taylor; Sarah E Harris; John M Starr; Ian J Deary Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 3.240