Literature DB >> 26343787

Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H p (3) monitoring. A 2015 review.

Eleftheria Carinou1, Paolo Ferrari, Olivera Ciraj Bjelac, Merce Gingaume, Marta Sans Merce, Una O'Connor.   

Abstract

A thorough literature review about the current situation on the implementation of eye lens monitoring has been performed in order to provide recommendations regarding dosemeter types, calibration procedures and practical aspects of eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel. Most relevant data and recommendations from about 100 papers have been analysed and classified in the following topics: challenges of today in eye lens monitoring; conversion coefficients, phantoms and calibration procedures for eye lens dose evaluation; correction factors and dosemeters for eye lens dose measurements; dosemeter position and influence of protective devices. The major findings of the review can be summarised as follows: the recommended operational quantity for the eye lens monitoring is H p (3). At present, several dosemeters are available for eye lens monitoring and calibration procedures are being developed. However, in practice, very often, alternative methods are used to assess the dose to the eye lens. A summary of correction factors found in the literature for the assessment of the eye lens dose is provided. These factors can give an estimation of the eye lens dose when alternative methods, such as the use of a whole body dosemeter, are used. A wide range of values is found, thus indicating the large uncertainty associated with these simplified methods. Reduction factors from most common protective devices obtained experimentally and using Monte Carlo calculations are presented. The paper concludes that the use of a dosemeter placed at collar level outside the lead apron can provide a useful first estimate of the eye lens exposure. However, for workplaces with estimated annual equivalent dose to the eye lens close to the dose limit, specific eye lens monitoring should be performed. Finally, training of the involved medical staff on the risks of ionising radiation for the eye lens and on the correct use of protective systems is strongly recommended.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26343787     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/R17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  7 in total

1.  Summary of the Italian inter-society recommendations for radiation protection optimization in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Gaetano Compagnone; Renato Padovani; Maria Antonietta D'Avanzo; Sveva Grande; Francesco Campanella; Antonella Rosi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  New organ-based tube current modulation method to reduce the radiation dose during computed tomography of the head: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose to the eyes in the phantom study.

Authors:  Jung-Su Kim; Soon-Mu Kwon; Jung-Min Kim; Sang-Wook Yoon
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Angular dependence of shielding effect of radiation protective eyewear for radiation protection of crystalline lens.

Authors:  Yuma Hirata; Toshioh Fujibuchi; Katsuya Fujita; Takayuki Igarashi; Eiji Nishimaru; Shogo Horita; Reiko Sakurai; Koji Ono
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 4.  Eye protection in interventional procedures.

Authors:  Beth A Schueler; Kenneth A Fetterly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.629

5.  Application of Bayesian statistics for radiation dose assessment in mixed beta-gamma fields.

Authors:  I Słonecka; J Krasowska; Z Baranowska; K W Fornalski
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Radiation Dose to the Eye Lens Through Radiological Imaging Procedures at the Surgical Workplace During Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Christian Apelmann; Birgitt Kowald; Nils Weinrich; Jens Dischinger; Albert Nienhaus; Klaus Seide; Heiko Martens; Christian Jürgens
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Assessment of eye doses to staff involved in interventional cardiology procedures in Kuwait.

Authors:  Meshari Alnaaimi; Mousa Alduaij; Faisal Shenawy; Musab Algaily; Talal Mohammedzein; Mohamed Shaaban; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 1.925

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.