Literature DB >> 26343521

IFN type III: in vivo NK cell response.

Fernando Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes, Arabella Young, Mark J Smyth1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immune response; Immunity; Immunology and Microbiology Section

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26343521      PMCID: PMC4652976          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


× No keyword cloud information.
Despite extensive studies over the last decade reinforcing the role of the immune system in controlling cancer progression and inflammatory disorders, our knowledge of the innate immune system remains quite poor. Natural killer (NK) cells are naturally circulating innate lymphocytes that protect against both tumor development and infection. NK cells exert two major effector functions, the cytotoxic clearance of abnormal target cells and the ability to heighten inflammatory responses through production of cytokines and chemokines. Both mouse and human NK cells exist in at least three differentiation stages [defined by marker pairings such as CD27/CD11b (mouse), DNAM-1+/− (mouse) and CD16/CD56 (human)] [1, 2, 3]. Each of these stages display receptor expression variance associated with their tissue distribution, regulation, survival, cytotoxicity and cytokine/chemokine producing capacity. The activity of NK cells depends on the interplay between a multitude of inhibitory receptors (that bind major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules) and activating receptors (e.g. NKG2D, CD16 etc.), and they operate in concert to control NK cell effector functions [4]. Alongside receptor modulation of NK cell function, certain cytokines initiate and maintain NK cell responses. In particular, the interferon family, consisting of three distinct subtypes - type I, II and III IFN, has been associated with improving responses to viral and pathogenic infection. However, regulation of their induction and the distribution of their respective IFN receptors vary, resulting in modulation of function. Type I IFN (IFN-α/β), predominantly produced by activated myeloid cells (e.g. mononuclear phagocytes and dendritic cells), plays an essential role in NK cell priming allowing for optimal cytokine production, cytotoxic killing and antiviral immunity [5] (Figure 1). In response to NK cell priming by type I IFN, production of type II IFN (IFN-γ) is enabled (Figure 1). This cytokine stimulates the adaptive immune response through Th1 polarization of CD4+ T cells, which subsequently activates cytotoxic T lymphocytes to initiate aberrant cell clearance [6].
Figure 1

NK cell optimal in vivo activity requires type I and III IFN receptors

Antigen-presenting cells (APC) and mononuclear phagocytes produce cytokines such as IFN type I and III, which prime NK cells and enhance their effector function for enhanced cytotoxic killing and cytokine production.

NK cell optimal in vivo activity requires type I and III IFN receptors

Antigen-presenting cells (APC) and mononuclear phagocytes produce cytokines such as IFN type I and III, which prime NK cells and enhance their effector function for enhanced cytotoxic killing and cytokine production. While activation of hematopoietic cells by type I IFN and type II IFN is well established, the role of type III IFN (IFN-λ) in modulating immune cell functions has not been thoroughly explored. The most recently described member of the IFN family, type III IFN shares common anti-viral functions and activation of JAK-STAT signal transduction with type I IFN. However, responses to type III IFN are more limited, due to restricted receptor expression [7]. Recognition of type III IFN occurs through a heterodimer formed by IL-28R and IL-10R2 subunits predominantly found on plasmacytoid DCs, B cells, epithelial cells, and hepatocytes [7]. While the receptor range is limited, IFN-λ has displayed potent anti-viral and anti-tumor responses both via targeting infected or transformed cells directly as well as host-dependent mechanisms. Recently, using type III IFN receptor (IL-28R−/−) gene-targeted mice, we observed that this receptor is involved in the in vivo priming of NK cells to enhance their effector functions [8]. Specifically, loss of type III IFN signaling resulted in reduced pro-inflammatory response and improved survival in both lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced endotoxicosis and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-induced septic shock models. Reduced IFN-γ production by IL-28R-deficient NK cells in response to LPS-induced endotoxicosis was identified in complete gene deletion and NK cell reconstituted immunodeficient Rag2−/−γc−/− mice. This indicates that type III IFN contributes to optimal activation of NK cells, enabling initiation of IFN-γ production (Figure 1). In addition, reduced NK cell antitumor activity was evident in several transplantable and spontaneous cancer models in IL-28R-deficient compared to wild type mice. While we detected IL-28R mRNA by RT-PCR, we were unable to demonstrate in vitro that pegylated IFN-λ (PEG-IL-28A) acts on NK cell cytokine production or killing. In contrast, in vivo treatment with PEG-IL-28A enhanced antitumor responses from wild type NK cells both alone and in combination with type I IFN [8]. Currently, targeting NK cells via immunotherapies to bolster their activity is of major interest, due to their rapid antigen-independent host immune response. Here, we identified that NK cells require IL-28R signaling for optimal in vivo activity [8]. Both IFN-λ and IFN-α have been utilized clinically as anti-viral therapies, as well as anti-tumor treatments for the latter. While IFN-α displays high toxicity, due to widespread receptor expression, the restricted range of IFN-λ leads to improved safety profiles. Therefore, utilization of IFN-λ as an adjuvant therapy to achieve optimal NK cell effector function should be considered as a potential combinatorial treatment modality.
  8 in total

1.  IL-28, IL-29 and their class II cytokine receptor IL-28R.

Authors:  Paul Sheppard; Wayne Kindsvogel; Wenfeng Xu; Katherine Henderson; Stacy Schlutsmeyer; Theodore E Whitmore; Rolf Kuestner; Ursula Garrigues; Carl Birks; Jenny Roraback; Craig Ostrander; Dennis Dong; Jinu Shin; Scott Presnell; Brian Fox; Betty Haldeman; Emily Cooper; David Taft; Teresa Gilbert; Francis J Grant; Monica Tackett; William Krivan; Gary McKnight; Chris Clegg; Don Foster; Kevin M Klucher
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Priming of natural killer cells by nonmucosal mononuclear phagocytes requires instructive signals from commensal microbiota.

Authors:  Stephanie C Ganal; Stephanie L Sanos; Carsten Kallfass; Karin Oberle; Caroline Johner; Carsten Kirschning; Stefan Lienenklaus; Siegfried Weiss; Peter Staeheli; Peter Aichele; Andreas Diefenbach
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 31.745

3.  CD27 dissects mature NK cells into two subsets with distinct responsiveness and migratory capacity.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hayakawa; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  NK cells require IL-28R for optimal in vivo activity.

Authors:  Fernando Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes; Arabella Young; Deepak Mittal; Ludovic Martinet; Claudia Bruedigam; Kazuyoshi Takeda; Christopher E Andoniou; Mariapia A Degli-Esposti; Geoffrey R Hill; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNAM-1 expression marks an alternative program of NK cell maturation.

Authors:  Ludovic Martinet; Lucas Ferrari De Andrade; Camille Guillerey; Jason S Lee; Jing Liu; Fernando Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes; Dana S Hutchinson; Tatiana B Kolesnik; Sandra E Nicholson; Nicholas D Huntington; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 6.  Balancing natural killer cell activation through paired receptors.

Authors:  Ludovic Martinet; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 7.  Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells.

Authors:  Eric Vivier; David H Raulet; Alessandro Moretta; Michael A Caligiuri; Laurence Zitvogel; Lewis L Lanier; Wayne M Yokoyama; Sophie Ugolini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Induced recruitment of NK cells to lymph nodes provides IFN-gamma for T(H)1 priming.

Authors:  Alfonso Martín-Fontecha; Lindy L Thomsen; Sara Brett; Craig Gerard; Martin Lipp; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Federica Sallusto
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 25.606

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Human Innate Lymphoid Cells in Influenza Infection and Vaccination.

Authors:  Amrita Kumar; Rashmi Kumari; Timothy Liu; Weiping Cao; Bruce A Davidson; Paul R Knight; Suryaprakash Sambhara
Journal:  Crit Rev Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.735

Review 2.  IFN-λ: A New Inducer of Local Immunity against Cancer and Infections.

Authors:  Ahmed Lasfar; Andrew Zloza; Andrew de la Torre; Karine A Cohen-Solal
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  In vitro differentiated plasmacytoid dendritic cells as a tool to induce anti-leukemia activity of natural killer cells.

Authors:  Yildian Díaz-Rodríguez; Paulo Cordeiro; Assila Belounis; Sabine Herblot; Michel Duval
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  The double stranded RNA analog poly-IC elicits both robust IFN-λ production and oncolytic activity in human gastrointestinal cancer cells.

Authors:  Chantal Bou-Hanna; Anne Jarry; Jean-François Mosnier; Céline Bossard; Christian L Laboisse
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-10-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.