Literature DB >> 26343301

The safety and feasibility of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) on the medial side of the femur: A cadaveric injection study.

C Jiamton1, T Apivatthakakul2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) on the medial side of the femur appears to be a dangerous procedure due to possible femoral artery injury.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the feasibility of applying MIPO of the femur via the medial approach, and to determine the anatomical relationship and structures at risk between the artery and the implant using computed tomography angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive study of ten fresh cadavers was done. Two separate incisions were made, creating a submuscular tunnel close to the medial side of the femur. An 11- or 13-hole LCP lateral proximal tibial plate (5.0mm) was inserted through the distal incision into the submuscular tunnel and fixed. A CT angiogram with 3D reconstruction was made to determine the distance from and location of the plate relative to the femoral artery and surgical dissection was done to identify the structures at risk.
RESULTS: No disruptions of superficial or deep femoral arteries were found. The closest distances from the superficial femoral artery and deep femoral artery to the plate were 8.3-27.2mm (average 16.3mm) (99% CI: 12.7-19.9) at the level 3 and 4.5-20.0mm (average 8.6mm) (99% CI: 6.4-10.9) at the level 2 in the proximal part of femur, respectively. The location where the SFA crossed the anterior cortex of the femur in the sagittal plane was 9.7-36.0% of the femoral length (average 20.1%) (99% CI: 15.0-25.3%) and the posterior cortex of the femur was 24.7-55.3% of the femoral length (average 40.8%) (99% CI: 35.0-46.7%). The location where the DFA crossed the anterior cortex of the femur in the sagittal plane was 7.9-25.3% of the femoral length (average 13.4%) (99% CI: 10.6-16.3%) and where it crossed the posterior cortex of the femur was 21.7-39.4% of the femoral length (average 31.2%) (99% CI: 27.1-33.3%).
CONCLUSION: MIPO of the femur via medial approach is a feasible option for treatment of femoral fractures when the lateral approach is contraindicated. The distal 60% of the femoral length is safe for this approach.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral artery; Femoral fracture; Medial approach; Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26343301     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  10 in total

1.  Reduced invasive and muscle-sparing operative approaches to the posterolateral chest wall provide an excellent accessibility for the operative stabilization! : Minimized approaches to the posterolateral chest wall.

Authors:  A Langenbach; Pascal Oppel; Sina Grupp; Sebastian Krinner; Milena Pachowsky; Thomas Buder; Melanie Schulz-Drost; Friedrich F Hennig; Stefan Schulz-Drost
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Outcomes of dual plating for unstable distal femoral fractures: a subgroup comparison between periprosthetic and non-periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Jae Hyeon Seo; Bum-Sik Lee; Jong-Min Kim; Jung Jae Kim; Ji Wan Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 3.  Dual-Plating in Distal Femur Fracture: A Systematic Review and Limited Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sujit Kumar Tripathy; Narayan Prasad Mishra; Paulson Varghese; Sibasish Panigrahi; Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa; Akshay Goel; Ramesh Kumar Sen
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) on Comminuted Tibial or Femoral Fractures.

Authors:  Ali Andalib; Erfan Sheikhbahaei; Zeynab Andalib; Mohammad A Tahririan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 5.  Biomechanical and anatomical considerations for dual plating of distal femur fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Graham J DeKeyser; Anne J Hakim; Dillon C O'Neill; Carsten W Schlickewei; Lucas S Marchand; Justin M Haller
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 6.  The floating knee: a review on ipsilateral femoral and tibial fractures.

Authors:  Josep Muñoz Vives; Jean-Christophe Bel; Arantxa Capel Agundez; Francisco Chana Rodríguez; José Palomo Traver; Morten Schultz-Larsen; Theodoros Tosounidis
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

7.  Anthropometric Factors on Safe Distances between Popliteal Vessels to the Femur for Cerclage Wiring of the Distal Femoral Fracture: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Hao-Wei Chang; Chia-Yu Lin; Hui-Yi Chen; Yi-Wen Chen; Hsien-Te Chen; I-Hao Lin; Chin-Jung Hsu; Tsung-Li Lin
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Impact on periosteal vasculature after dual plating of the distal femur: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Michael J Chen; Lawrence Henry Goodnough; Brett P Salazar; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2021-04-12

Review 9.  Double fixation for complex distal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Christoph Sommer; Mark Lee; Tracy Y Zhu; Karsten Schwieger; Christopher Finkemeier
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-04-21

10.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with dual plating for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong-Geun Park; Hyunseong Kang; Jung-Kook Song; Jaehwang Lee; Joseph Y Rho; Sungwook Choi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.