David J McConkey1, Woonyoung Choi2, Yu Shen3, I-Ling Lee2, Sima Porten2, Surena F Matin2, Ashish M Kamat2, Paul Corn4, Randall E Millikan5, Colin Dinney2, Bogdan Czerniak6, Arlene O Siefker-Radtke7. 1. Department of Urology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Urology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Statistics, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Essentia Health, Duluth, MN, USA. 6. Department of Pathology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 7. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: asiefker@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling (GEP) suggests there are three subtypes of muscle-invasive urothelial cancer (UC): basal, which has the worst prognosis; p53-like; and luminal. We hypothesized that GEP of transurethral resection (TUR) and cystectomy specimens would predict subtypes that could benefit from chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical outcomes for patients treated with dose-dense (DD) methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) and bevacizumab (B) and the impact of UC subtype. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients enrolled in a neoadjuvant trial of four cycles of DDMVAC + B between 2007 and 2010. TUR and cystectomy specimens for GEP were available from 38 and 23 patients, respectively, and from an additional confirmation cohort of 49 patients treated with perioperative MVAC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Relationships with outcomes were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression and log-rank tests. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Chemotherapy was active, with pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 downstaging rates of 38% and 53%, respectively, and 5-yr overall survival (OS) of 63%. Bevacizumab had no appreciable impact on outcomes. Basal tumors had improved survival compared to luminal and p53-like tumors (5-yr OS 91%, 73%, and 36%, log-rank p=0.015), with similar findings on multivariate analysis. Bone metastases within 2 yr were exclusively associated with the p53-like subtype (p53-like 100%, luminal 0%, basal 0%; p ≤ 0.001). Tumors enriched with the p53-like subtype at cystectomy suggested chemoresistance for this subtype. A separate cohort treated with perioperative MVAC confirmed the UC subtype survival benefit (5-yr OS 77% for basal, 56% for luminal, and 56% for p53-like; p=0.021). Limitations include the small number of pretreatment specimens with sufficient tissue for GEP. CONCLUSION: GEP was predictive of clinical UC outcomes. The basal subtype was associated with better survival, and the p53-like subtype was associated with bone metastases and chemoresistant disease. PATIENT SUMMARY: We can no longer think of urothelial cancer as a single disease. Gene expression profiling identifies subtypes of urothelial cancer that differ in their natural history and sensitivity to chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling (GEP) suggests there are three subtypes of muscle-invasive urothelial cancer (UC): basal, which has the worst prognosis; p53-like; and luminal. We hypothesized that GEP of transurethral resection (TUR) and cystectomy specimens would predict subtypes that could benefit from chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical outcomes for patients treated with dose-dense (DD) methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) and bevacizumab (B) and the impact of UC subtype. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients enrolled in a neoadjuvant trial of four cycles of DDMVAC + B between 2007 and 2010. TUR and cystectomy specimens for GEP were available from 38 and 23 patients, respectively, and from an additional confirmation cohort of 49 patients treated with perioperative MVAC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Relationships with outcomes were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression and log-rank tests. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Chemotherapy was active, with pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 downstaging rates of 38% and 53%, respectively, and 5-yr overall survival (OS) of 63%. Bevacizumab had no appreciable impact on outcomes. Basal tumors had improved survival compared to luminal and p53-like tumors (5-yr OS 91%, 73%, and 36%, log-rank p=0.015), with similar findings on multivariate analysis. Bone metastases within 2 yr were exclusively associated with the p53-like subtype (p53-like 100%, luminal 0%, basal 0%; p ≤ 0.001). Tumors enriched with the p53-like subtype at cystectomy suggested chemoresistance for this subtype. A separate cohort treated with perioperative MVAC confirmed the UC subtype survival benefit (5-yr OS 77% for basal, 56% for luminal, and 56% for p53-like; p=0.021). Limitations include the small number of pretreatment specimens with sufficient tissue for GEP. CONCLUSION: GEP was predictive of clinical UC outcomes. The basal subtype was associated with better survival, and the p53-like subtype was associated with bone metastases and chemoresistant disease. PATIENT SUMMARY: We can no longer think of urothelial cancer as a single disease. Gene expression profiling identifies subtypes of urothelial cancer that differ in their natural history and sensitivity to chemotherapy.
Authors: K Inoue; J W Slaton; T Karashima; C Yoshikawa; T Shuin; P Sweeney; R Millikan; C P Dinney Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Floris H Groenendijk; Jeroen de Jong; Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte; Magali Michaut; Andreas Schlicker; Dennis Peters; Arno Velds; Marja Nieuwland; Michel M van den Heuvel; Ron M Kerkhoven; Lodewijk F Wessels; Annegien Broeks; Bas W G van Rhijn; René Bernards; Michiel S van der Heijden Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Emil Scosyrev; Benjamin W Ely; Edward M Messing; V O Speights; H Barton Grossman; David P Wood; Ralph W de Vere White; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ronald B Natale; Catherine M Tangen; E David Crawford; Ian M Thompson Journal: BJU Int Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: R Millikan; C Dinney; D Swanson; P Sweeney; J Y Ro; T L Smith; D Williams; C Logothetis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-10-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Colin P Dinney; Yu Shen; Dallas L Williams; Ashish M Kamat; H Barton Grossman; Randall E Millikan Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Elizabeth R Plimack; Jean H Hoffman-Censits; Rosalia Viterbo; Edouard J Trabulsi; Eric A Ross; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Costas D Lallas; Yu-Ning Wong; Jianqing Lin; Alexander Kutikov; Efrat Dotan; Timothy A Brennan; Norma Palma; Essel Dulaimi; Reza Mehrazin; Stephen A Boorjian; William Kevin Kelly; Robert G Uzzo; Gary R Hudes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karsten Salomo; Doreen Huebner; Manja U Boehme; Alexander Herr; Werner Brabetz; Ulrike Heberling; Oliver W Hakenberg; Daniela Jahn; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Daniel Steinbach; Marcus Horstmann; Michael Froehner; Manfred P Wirth; Susanne Fuessel Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Jean V Joseph; Ralph Brasacchio; Chunkit Fung; Jay Reeder; Kevin Bylund; Deepak Sahasrabudhe; Shu Yuan Yeh; Ahmed Ghazi; Patrick Fultz; Deborah Rubens; Guan Wu; Eric Singer; Edward Schwarz; Supriya Mohile; James Mohler; Dan Theodorescu; Yi Fen Lee; Paul Okunieff; David McConkey; Hani Rashid; Chawnshang Chang; Yves Fradet; Khurshid Guru; Janet Kukreja; Gerald Sufrin; Yair Lotan; Howard Bailey; Katia Noyes; Seymour Schwartz; Kathy Rideout; Gennady Bratslavsky; Steven C Campbell; Ithaar Derweesh; Per-Anders Abrahamsson; Mark Soloway; Leonard Gomella; Dragan Golijanin; Robert Svatek; Thomas Frye; Seth Lerner; Ganesh Palapattu; George Wilding; Michael Droller; Donald Trump Journal: Bladder Cancer Date: 2018-10-03
Authors: Uttam Satyal; Rahmat K Sikder; David McConkey; Elizabeth R Plimack; Philip H Abbosh Journal: Curr Opin Urol Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.309
Authors: Laura-Maria Krabbe; Vitaly Margulis; Andres Jan Schrader; Shahrokh F Shariat; Kilian M Gust; Martin Boegemann Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Charles Chuanhai Guo; Vipulkumar Dadhania; Li Zhang; Tadeusz Majewski; Jolanta Bondaruk; Maciej Sykulski; Weronika Wronowska; Anna Gambin; Yan Wang; Shizhen Zhang; Enrique Fuentes-Mattei; Ashish Madhav Kamat; Colin Dinney; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Woonyoung Choi; Keith A Baggerly; David McConkey; John N Weinstein; Bogdan Czerniak Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Homayoun Zargar; Jay B Shah; Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte; Kylea R Potvin; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Philippe E Spiess; Eric Winquist; Simon Horenblas; Colin Dinney; Peter C Black; Wassim Kassouf Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-06-17 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Peter E Clark; Philippe E Spiess; Neeraj Agarwal; Rick Bangs; Stephen A Boorjian; Mark K Buyyounouski; Jason A Efstathiou; Thomas W Flaig; Terence Friedlander; Richard E Greenberg; Khurshid A Guru; Noah Hahn; Harry W Herr; Christopher Hoimes; Brant A Inman; A Karim Kader; Adam S Kibel; Timothy M Kuzel; Subodh M Lele; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff Michalski; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lance C Pagliaro; Sumanta K Pal; Anthony Patterson; Daniel Petrylak; Elizabeth R Plimack; Kamal S Pohar; Michael P Porter; Wade J Sexton; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Guru Sonpavde; Jonathan Tward; Geoffrey Wile; Mary A Dwyer; Courtney Smith Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Sumanta Kumar Pal; Neeraj Agarwal; Stephen Anthony Boorjian; Noah M Hahn; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Peter E Clark; Elizabeth R Plimack Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M N Pham; A B Apolo; M De Santis; M D Galsky; B C Leibovich; L L Pisters; A O Siefker-Radtke; G Sonpavde; G D Steinberg; C N Sternberg; S T Tagawa; A Z Weizer; M E Woods; M I Milowsky Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 4.226