Kok-Yong Seng1, Kim-Hor Hee2, Gaik-Hong Soon2, Nicholas Chew3, Saye H Khoo4, Lawrence Soon-U Lee5. 1. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore Defence Medical and Environmental Research Institute, DSO National Laboratories, Singapore. 2. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 3. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore. 4. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 5. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore lawrence_lee@nuhs.edu.sg.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Rifampicin is a first-line anti-TB drug. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of rifampicin and its partly active metabolite, 25-deacetyl-rifampicin, with and without isoniazid, and to identify covariates that may explain variability in their disposition under steady-state conditions. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy Asian subjects were randomized to receive rifampicin (600 mg) or rifampicin (600 mg)/isoniazid (300 mg) daily for 14 days. After a 14 day washout, subjects were switched over to rifampicin (600 mg)/isoniazid (300 mg) or rifampicin (600 mg) daily. Plasma concentration-time data were analysed using NONMEM to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters and evaluate relationships between parameters and demographic factors, and metabolic enzyme, transporter and transcriptional regulator genotypes. Allometric scaling of clearance and volume of distribution terms based on body weight was applied. RESULTS: A one-compartment model in which absorption was described by a transit absorption model best described the rifampicin data. 25-Deacetyl-rifampicin pharmacokinetic data were best described by a two-compartment model linked to the rifampicin model. None of the investigated covariates significantly influenced the disposition of rifampicin and 25-deacetyl-rifampicin. The apparent clearance of rifampicin and 25-deacetyl-rifampicin was estimated at 10.3 [relative standard error (RSE) 5.6%] and 95.8 (RSE 10%) L/h, respectively, for 70 kg adults. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of rifampicin and its main metabolite were characterized. Prospective studies with a larger number of participants, including patients, are needed to validate the results of this study.
OBJECTIVES: Rifampicin is a first-line anti-TB drug. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of rifampicin and its partly active metabolite, 25-deacetyl-rifampicin, with and without isoniazid, and to identify covariates that may explain variability in their disposition under steady-state conditions. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy Asian subjects were randomized to receive rifampicin (600 mg) or rifampicin (600 mg)/isoniazid (300 mg) daily for 14 days. After a 14 day washout, subjects were switched over to rifampicin (600 mg)/isoniazid (300 mg) or rifampicin (600 mg) daily. Plasma concentration-time data were analysed using NONMEM to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters and evaluate relationships between parameters and demographic factors, and metabolic enzyme, transporter and transcriptional regulator genotypes. Allometric scaling of clearance and volume of distribution terms based on body weight was applied. RESULTS: A one-compartment model in which absorption was described by a transit absorption model best described the rifampicin data. 25-Deacetyl-rifampicin pharmacokinetic data were best described by a two-compartment model linked to the rifampicin model. None of the investigated covariates significantly influenced the disposition of rifampicin and 25-deacetyl-rifampicin. The apparent clearance of rifampicin and 25-deacetyl-rifampicin was estimated at 10.3 [relative standard error (RSE) 5.6%] and 95.8 (RSE 10%) L/h, respectively, for 70 kg adults. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of rifampicin and its main metabolite were characterized. Prospective studies with a larger number of participants, including patients, are needed to validate the results of this study.
Authors: Ben Knippenberg; Madhu Page-Sharp; Sam Salman; Ben Clark; John Dyer; Kevin T Batty; Timothy M E Davis; Laurens Manning Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Rajith K R Rajoli; Paul Curley; Justin Chiong; David Back; Charles Flexner; Andrew Owen; Marco Siccardi Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-05-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Stijn W van Beek; Rob Ter Heine; Ron J Keizer; Cecile Magis-Escurra; Rob E Aarnoutse; Elin M Svensson Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Roger K Verbeeck; Gunar Günther; Dan Kibuule; Christian Hunter; Tim W Rennie Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: M Tonnelier; A Bouras; C Joseph; Y El Samad; B Brunschweiler; J-L Schmit; C Mabille; J-P Lanoix Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Marieke G G Sturkenboom; Anne-Grete Märtson; Elin M Svensson; Derek J Sloan; Kelly E Dooley; Simone H J van den Elsen; Paolo Denti; Charles A Peloquin; Rob E Aarnoutse; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-03-06 Impact factor: 6.447