Literature DB >> 26341961

Response to erythropoietic-stimulating agents in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Blanca Xicoy1, Ulrich Germing2, María-José Jimenez1, Olga Garcia1, Regina Garcia1, Jeniffer Schemenau2, Carme Pedro1, Elisa Luño1, Teresa Bernal1, Bernardo González1, Corinna Strupp2, Maite Ardanaz1, Andrea Kuendgen2, María-Teresa Cedena1, Judith Neukirchen2, Marisa Calabuig1, Salut Brunet1, Angeles Medina1, María-Luz Amigo1, Fernando Ramos1, Marta Callejas1, María Díez-Campelo1, Alicia Bailén1, Rosa Collado1, Ana Vicente1, Montserrat Arnan1, David Valcarcel1, María Jesús Arilla1, Lurdes Zamora1, Luis Benlloch1, Guillermo Sanz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of erythropoietic-stimulating agents (ESA) in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is unknown. Our objective was to analyze erythroid response (ER) and overall survival (OS) in a series of 94 patients with CMML treated with ESA.
METHODS: We analyzed a series of 94 patients with CMML treated with ESA included in the Spanish and Düsseldorf-MDS registries.
FINDINGS: ER was observed in 64% of patients and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence in 31%. The median duration of ER was 7 months (range, 0-88). CPSS and EPO level were significantly associated with ER in multivariate analysis (P = 0.003). Considering only patients with CPSS low- or intermediate-1-risk group, the absence of RBC transfusion dependence and erythropoietin (EPO) level predicted ER (P = 0.003 and P = 0.008, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only the EPO level retained its prognostic value (P = 0.029). Achievement of ER correlated with a better survival since ER evaluation (P = 0.016).
INTERPRETATION: The CPSS and EPO levels are adequate tools to select CMML patients with symptomatic anemia who may benefit from treatment with ESA. A significant ER to ESA is expected in anemic patients with low/intermediate-1 CMML risk by the CPSS and a low endogenous serum EPO level.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; erythropoietic-stimulating agents; response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26341961     DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Haematol        ISSN: 0902-4441            Impact factor:   2.997


  5 in total

Review 1.  Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Onyee Chan; Aline Renneville; Eric Padron
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in elderly patients with anemia: response and cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors:  Zachary Gowanlock; Swetha Sriram; Alison Martin; Anargyros Xenocostas; Alejandro Lazo-Langner
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-08-17

Review 3.  Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Insights into Biology, Prognostic Factors, and Treatment.

Authors:  Giacomo Coltro; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  CMML: Clinical and molecular aspects.

Authors:  Raphael Itzykson; Matthieu Duchmann; Nolwenn Lucas; Eric Solary
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemias in Adults: Recommendations From the European Hematology Association and the European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Raphael Itzykson; Pierre Fenaux; David Bowen; Nicholas C P Cross; Jorge Cortes; Theo De Witte; Ulrich Germing; Francesco Onida; Eric Padron; Uwe Platzbecker; Valeria Santini; Guillermo F Sanz; Eric Solary; Arjan Van de Loosdrecht; Luca Malcovati
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2018-11-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.