Literature DB >> 26341920

Analysis of KRAS/NRAS Mutations in a Phase III Study of Panitumumab with FOLFIRI Compared with FOLFIRI Alone as Second-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Marc Peeters1, Kelly S Oliner2, Timothy J Price3, Andrés Cervantes4, Alberto F Sobrero5, Michel Ducreux6, Yevhen Hotko7, Thierry André8, Emily Chan9, Florian Lordick10, Cornelis J A Punt11, Andrew H Strickland12, Gregory Wilson13, Tudor E Ciuleanu14, Laslo Roman15, Eric Van Cutsem16, Pei He2, Hua Yu2, Reija Koukakis17, Jan-Henrik Terwey17, Andre S Jung2, Roger Sidhu2, Scott D Patterson2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the influence of RAS mutation status on the treatment effect of panitumumab in a prospective-retrospective analysis of a randomized, multicenter phase III study of panitumumab plus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) versus FOLFIRI alone as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0039183). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Outcomes were from the study's primary analysis. RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 (KRAS exons 3, 4; NRAS exons 2, 3, 4; BRAF exon 15) were detected by bidirectional Sanger sequencing in wild-type KRAS exon 2 tumor specimens. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were coprimary endpoints.
RESULTS: The RAS ascertainment rate was 85%; 18% of wild-type KRAS exon 2 tumors harbored other RAS mutations. For PFS and OS, the hazard ratio (HR) for panitumumab plus FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI alone more strongly favored panitumumab in the wild-type RAS population than in the wild-type KRAS exon 2 population [PFS HR, 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.91); P = 0.007 vs. 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59-0.90); P = 0.004; OS HR, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.63-1.03); P = 0.08 vs. 0.85 (95% CI, 0.70-1.04); P = 0.12]. Patients with RAS mutations were unlikely to benefit from panitumumab. Among RAS wild-type patients, the objective response rate was 41% in the panitumumab-FOLFIRI group versus 10% in the FOLFIRI group.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RAS mutations were unlikely to benefit from panitumumab-FOLFIRI and the benefit-risk of panitumumab-FOLFIRI was improved in the wild-type RAS population compared with the wild-type KRAS exon 2 population. These findings support RAS testing for patients with mCRC. Clin Cancer Res; 21(24); 5469-79. ©2015 AACR.See related commentary by Salazar and Ciardiello, p. 5415. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26341920     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  61 in total

Review 1.  Molecular subtypes in cancers of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Maarten F Bijlsma; Anguraj Sadanandam; Patrick Tan; Louis Vermeulen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Clinical Utility of Analyzing Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Nakamura; Takayuki Yoshino
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-26

Review 3.  From tumour heterogeneity to advances in precision treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cornelis J A Punt; Miriam Koopman; Louis Vermeulen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Molecular Landscape and Treatment Options for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Miyamoto; Wu Zhang; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-27

5.  Continuation of Bevacizumab vs Cetuximab Plus Chemotherapy After First Progression in KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The UNICANCER PRODIGE18 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jaafar Bennouna; Sandrine Hiret; Aurelie Bertaut; Olivier Bouché; Gael Deplanque; Christian Borel; Eric François; Thierry Conroy; François Ghiringhelli; Gaëtan des Guetz; Jean-François Seitz; Pascal Artru; Mohamed Hebbar; Trevor Stanbury; Marc G Denis; Antoine Adenis; Christophe Borg
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Comprehensive Detection of Single Amino Acid Variants and Evaluation of Their Deleterious Potential in a PANC-1 Cell Line.

Authors:  Zhijing Tan; Jianhui Zhu; Paul M Stemmer; Liangliang Sun; Zhichang Yang; Kendall Schultz; Matthew J Gaffrey; Anthony J Cesnik; Xinpei Yi; Xiaohu Hao; Michael R Shortreed; Tujin Shi; David M Lubman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 7.  Optimizing biologic sequencing in metastatic colorectal cancer: first line and beyond.

Authors:  Z Jin; J M Hubbard
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  Molecular markers of prognosis and therapeutic targets in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Richard A Burkhart; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.279

Review 9.  Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Marta Schirripa; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

10.  Can CT-based radiomics signature predict KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Lei Yang; Di Dong; Mengjie Fang; Yongbei Zhu; Yali Zang; Zhenyu Liu; Hongmei Zhang; Jianming Ying; Xinming Zhao; Jie Tian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.