Literature DB >> 26341828

Quantity and quality of food losses along the Swiss potato supply chain: Stepwise investigation and the influence of quality standards on losses.

Christian Willersinn1, Gabriele Mack2, Patrik Mouron3, Andreas Keiser4, Michael Siegrist5.   

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a stepwise investigation of the quantity and quality of food losses along the Swiss potato supply chain. Quantitative data were collected from field trials, from structured interviews with wholesalers, processors and retailers, and from consumer surveys in combination with a 30-day diary study. The "Swiss trade customs for potatoes" pose the basis for the qualitative evaluation of losses. The influences of technological, institutional (business and economy; legislation and policy), and social drivers on the generation of fresh potato and processed potato products losses were assessed. Losses due to quality standards driven by food safety and consumer preferences for certain aesthetic standards have been evaluated too. Across the entire potato value chain, approximately 53-55% of the initial fresh potato production and 41-46% of the initial processing potato production are finally lost. Losses between organic and non-organic supply chains differ from 2% to 5%. From the total initial fresh potato production, 15-24% gets lost during agricultural production, a further 12-24% at wholesalers, 1-3% at retailers, and 15% at private households. In comparison, 5-11% of the initial production gets lost at wholesalers, a further 14-15% during processing, 0% at retailers, and 2% at private households. Losses during agricultural production do not vary much (13-25%) between fresh and processing potatoes. Approximately half of total potato losses occur because potatoes do not meet quality standards. 25-34% of these quality-driven losses are caused by food safety reasons, and the remainder are caused by consumer preferences or suitability for storage. In total, social drivers (e.g., consumer preferences, behavior, or socio-demographical factors) are responsible for two-thirds to three-fourths of all fresh potato losses and 40-45% of all processing potato losses. Technological drivers cause circa one-third of the total processing potato losses. The majority of the rejected potatoes are used as animal feed (67-90%) in Switzerland. Approximately 30% of all fresh potato losses are disposed while just 4-5% of all processing potato losses are thrown away. The interviewed experts stated that lower quality specifications might cause lower loss rates at the first stages of the supply chain but higher ones at the later stages due to worse storage or processing abilities of potatoes with defects, which also might affect proper tubers.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer preferences; Food loss; Loss treatment; Potato supply chain; Quality standards

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26341828     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  4 in total

Review 1.  Potential Use of Microbial Community Genomes in Various Dimensions of Agriculture Productivity and Its Management: A Review.

Authors:  Mir Asif Iquebal; Jaisri Jagannadham; Sarika Jaiswal; Ratna Prabha; Anil Rai; Dinesh Kumar
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  16S rRNA gene-based microbiome analysis identifies candidate bacterial strains that increase the storage time of potato tubers.

Authors:  Franziska Buchholz; Robert Junker; Abdul Samad; Livio Antonielli; Nataša Sarić; Tanja Kostić; Angela Sessitsch; Birgit Mitter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The potential of plant microbiota in reducing postharvest food loss.

Authors:  Franziska Buchholz; Tanja Kostić; Angela Sessitsch; Birgit Mitter
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.813

4.  Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: a mass flow analysis.

Authors:  Carla Caldeira; Valeria De Laurentiis; Sara Corrado; Freija van Holsteijn; Serenella Sala
Journal:  Resour Conserv Recycl       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 10.204

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.