Literature DB >> 26341822

The Barcelona Technique for Ileostomy Reversal.

Katie W Russell1, Brigid P O'Holleran1, Megan E Bowen1, Mary C Mone1, Courtney L Scaife2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Barcelona technique for bowel anastomosis is not well described in the currently available literature, but it saves steps when compared to conventional stapled anastomoses. In short, the proximal and distal ends of a resection margin are approximated, small enterotomies made, a stapler is passed into both lumens creating a common channel, and lastly, this same stapler is used to create the anastomosis and amputate the specimen. We report on this technique with ileostomy reversal in terms of cost and complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of ileostomy reversals (2006-2014) by a single surgical oncologist.
RESULTS: Thirty patients had surgery using the Barcelona technique. Median age was 58 years, and median postoperative surgical stay was 3 days. The majority of patients had rectal cancer initially treated with low anterior resection and diverting loop ileostomy (80 %). One patient had a wound infection (3 %), and there were no anastomotic leaks, intra-abdominal abscesses, or strictures. This technique required fewer stapler loads saving $510 in charges per case.
CONCLUSIONS: The Barcelona technique is safe and effective for ileostomy reversal. There are reduced costs related to equipment as compared to the conventional technique and thus the use of this method can result in significant medical cost savings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barcelona technique; Barcelona technique of Ravitch; Bowel anastomosis; Ileostomy reversal

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26341822     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2929-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  8 in total

Review 1.  Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Thorsten Löffler; Inga Rossion; Käthe Gooßen; Daniel Saure; Jürgen Weitz; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Wiebke Sewald; Norbert Senninger; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Technics of staple suturing in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  M M Ravitch; F M Steichen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A new, precise, and rapid technique of intestinal resection and anastomosis with staples.

Authors:  M M Ravitch; T H Ong; L Gazzola
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1974-07

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of published, randomized, controlled trials comparing suture anastomosis to stapled anastomosis for ileostomy closure.

Authors:  M S Sajid; L Craciunas; M K Baig; P Sains
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  G G Chude; N V Rayate; V Patris; Mahim Koshariya; Rajan Jagad; J Kawamoto; N J Lygidakis
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

7.  Stapled vs sutured colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  M Adloff; J P Arnaud; S Beehary
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-12

8.  Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey.

Authors:  Bulent Dinc; Nurettin Ay; Huseyin Ciyiltepe
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-19
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Safety and Feasibility of a Lower-Cost Stapler in Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Kurt E Roberts; L Renee Hilton; Danielle T Friedman; Joel S Frieder; Xuchen Zhang; Andrew J Duffy
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.129

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.