Literature DB >> 26341561

Effects of Stress on the Social Support Provided by Men and Women in Intimate Relationships.

Guy Bodenmann1, Nathalie Meuwly1, Janine Germann1, Fridtjof W Nussbeck2, Markus Heinrichs3, Thomas N Bradbury4.   

Abstract

Although evolutionary and social-structural models predict that women will be more supportive than men in relationships, behavioral studies fail to confirm this difference. We predicted instead that gender differences in support will be moderated by stress, and that men will provide lower-quality support primarily when their stress is high. We predicted further that the detrimental effects of stress on men's support will be more evident when men are responding to women's emotionally toned expressions of stress than when men are responding to women's affectively neutral expressions of stress. Stressed and unstressed men and women were observed providing support to a stressed relationship partner. While unstressed, men and women generally provided similar support to the stressed partner. While stressed, men provided lower-quality support than did comparably stressed women, but only in response to emotionally toned expressions of stress. Thus, gender differences in support may arise because women are better able than men to regulate other people's emotional distress while managing stresses of their own.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dyadic coping; gender differences; intimate relationships; social support; stress

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26341561     DOI: 10.1177/0956797615594616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  13 in total

1.  When poor communication does and does not matter: The moderating role of stress.

Authors:  Teresa P Nguyen; Benjamin R Karney; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2020-02-20

2.  Research on Marital Satisfaction and Stability in the 2010s: Challenging Conventional Wisdom.

Authors:  Benjamin R Karney; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2020-01-05

3.  Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Relationships.

Authors:  Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Adverse childhood experiences, stress, and intimate partner violence among newlywed couples living with low incomes.

Authors:  Julia F Hammett; Benjamin R Karney; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2020-01-30

5.  Distinct dyadic coping profiles in Chinese couples with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tingting Cai; Jianfeng Qian; Qingmei Huang; Changrong Yuan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Depressive Symptoms, External Stress, and Marital Adjustment: The Buffering Effect of Partner's Responsive Behavior.

Authors:  Paula R Pietromonaco; Nickola C Overall; Sally I Powers
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2021-03-25

7.  Social Network and Behavioral Synchrony Influences On Maternal and Infant Cortisol Response.

Authors:  Laura A Thompson; Bryan White
Journal:  J Hum Behav Soc Environ       Date:  2021-06-02

8.  Relationship Satisfaction and Well-being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Examining the Associations with Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Strategies.

Authors:  Zahide Tepeli Temiz; Ebra Elsharnouby
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2022-07-11

9.  Sexual Minority Stress and Social Support Explain the Association between Sexual Identity with Physical and Mental Health Problems among Young Lesbian and Bisexual Women.

Authors:  Sarah J Ehlke; Abby L Braitman; Charlotte A Dawson; Kristin E Heron; Robin J Lewis
Journal:  Sex Roles       Date:  2020-01-06

10.  Analyzing Dyadic Sequence Data-Research Questions and Implied Statistical Models.

Authors:  Peter Fuchs; Fridtjof W Nussbeck; Nathalie Meuwly; Guy Bodenmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.