Literature DB >> 26341397

Haploidentical T Cell-Replete Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Patients in or above the Sixth Decade of Age Compared with Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from an Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Related or Unrelated Donor.

Didier Blaise1, Sabine Fürst2, Roberto Crocchiolo3, Jean El-Cheikh2, Angela Granata2, Samia Harbi2, Reda Bouabdallah4, Raynier Devillier2, Stephania Bramanti3, Claude Lemarie5, Christophe Picard6, Christian Chabannon7, Pierre-Jean Weiller8, Catherine Faucher2, Bilal Mohty2, Norbert Vey9, Luca Castagna10.   

Abstract

It has recently been shown that a T cell-replete allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from a haploidentical donor (haplo-ID) could be a valid treatment for hematological malignancies. However, little data exist concerning older populations. We provided transplantation to 31 patients over the age of 55 years from a haplo-ID and compared their outcomes with patients of the same ages who underwent transplantation from a matched related (MRD) or an unrelated donor (UD). All 3 groups were comparable, except for their conditioning. Patients in haplo-ID group received 2 days of post-transplantation high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil, whereas patients in other groups received pretransplantation antithymocyte globulin, cyclosporine A, and additional mycophenolate mofetil in case of 1-antigen mismatch. All patients but 1 in the haplo-ID group engrafted. The incidence of grades 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was not statistically different between recipients from haplo-ID (cumulative incidence, 23%) and MRD (cumulative incidence, 21%) transplantations but it was lower than after UD HSCT (cumulative incidence, 44%). No patient in the haplo-ID group developed severe chronic GVHD, compared with cumulative incidences of 16% and 14% after MRD (P = .02) and UD (P = .03) grafts, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse were similar in the 3 groups, whereas nonrelapse mortality after UD HSCT was 3-fold higher than after haplo-ID or MRD HSCT. Overall, 2-year overall survival (70%), progression-free survival (67%), and progression and severe chronic GVHD-free survival (67%) probabilities after haplo-ID did not statistically differ from MRD transplantation (78%, 64%, and 51%, respectively), although they were higher than after UD transplantation (51% [P = .08], 38% [P = .02], and 31% [P = .007]). We conclude that T cell-replete haplo-ID HSCT followed by post-transplantation high-dose- cyclophosphamide in patients over 55 years is associated with promising results, similar to MRD HSCT, and is deserving prospective evaluation.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogeneic; Elderly; Haplo-identical; Related donor; Unrelated donor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26341397     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  29 in total

1.  HLA-identical siblings versus haploidentical donors: full match still beats half match.

Authors:  R Hanna; N S Majhail
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Donor type, in addition to transplantation in chronic phase and myeloablative conditioning, influence transplant survival for patients with advanced chronic myeloid leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  P Kongtim; K Adekola; D R Milton; R Ramlal; A Jimenez; J Chen; G Rondon; S Ahmed; P Kebriaei; O Betul; C M Hosing; U Popat; I Khouri; E Jabbour; J E Cortes; H M Kantarjian; R E Champlin; S O Ciurea
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 3.  Treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): revised Canadian consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Joseph M Brandwein; Nancy Zhu; Rajat Kumar; Brian Leber; Mitchell Sabloff; Irwindeep Sandhu; Jeannine Kassis; Harold J Olney; Mohamed Elemary; Andre C Schuh
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2017-07-25

4.  The patient's CMV serological status affects clinical outcome after T-cell replete haplo-HSCT and post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  R Crocchiolo; L Castagna; S Furst; R Devillier; B Sarina; S Bramanti; J El-Cheikh; A Granata; S Harbi; L Morabito; C Faucher; A Rimondo; D Girardi; B Mohty; B Calmels; C Carlo-Stella; C Chabannon; R Bouabdallah; A Santoro; N Vey; P J Weiller; D Blaise
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Haploidentical Transplantation for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Authors:  Stefan O Ciurea; Mithun V Shah; Rima M Saliba; Sameh Gaballa; Piyanuch Kongtim; Gabriela Rondon; Julianne Chen; Whitney Wallis; Kai Cao; Marina Konopleva; Naval Daver; Jorge Cortes; Farhad Ravandi; Amin Alousi; Sairah Ahmed; Uday Popat; Simrit Parmar; Qaiser Bashir; Oran Betul; Chitra Hosing; Elizabeth J Shpall; Katayoun Rezvani; Issa F Khouri; Partow Kebriaei; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Related haploidentical donors are a better choice than matched unrelated donors: Counterpoint.

Authors:  Bronwen E Shaw
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-02-14

7.  Related haploidentical donors are a better choice than matched unrelated donors: Point.

Authors:  Ephraim Joseph Fuchs
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-02-14

8.  Risk Factors for Graft-versus-Host Disease in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Annie Im; Armin Rashidi; Tao Wang; Michael Hemmer; Margaret L MacMillan; Joseph Pidala; Madan Jagasia; Steven Pavletic; Navneet S Majhail; Daniel Weisdorf; Hisham Abdel-Azim; Vaibhav Agrawal; A Samer Al-Homsi; Mahmoud Aljurf; Medhat Askar; Jeffery J Auletta; Asad Bashey; Amer Beitinjaneh; Vijaya Raj Bhatt; Michael Byrne; Jean-Yves Cahn; Mitchell Cairo; Paul Castillo; Jan Cerny; Saurabh Chhabra; Hannah Choe; Stefan Ciurea; Andrew Daly; Miguel Angel Diaz Perez; Nosha Farhadfar; Shahinaz M Gadalla; Robert Gale; Siddhartha Ganguly; Usama Gergis; Rabi Hanna; Peiman Hematti; Roger Herzig; Gerhard C Hildebrandt; Deepesh P Lad; Catherine Lee; Leslie Lehmann; Lazaros Lekakis; Rammurti T Kamble; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Pooja Khandelwal; Rodrigo Martino; Hemant S Murthy; Taiga Nishihori; Tracey A O'Brien; Richard F Olsson; Sagar S Patel; Miguel-Angel Perales; Tim Prestidge; Muna Qayed; Rizwan Romee; Hélène Schoemans; Sachiko Seo; Akshay Sharma; Melhem Solh; Roger Strair; Takanori Teshima; Alvaro Urbano-Ispizua; Marjolein Van der Poel; Ravi Vij; John L Wagner; Basem William; Baldeep Wirk; Jean A Yared; Steve R Spellman; Mukta Arora; Betty K Hamilton
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus anti-thymocyte globulin as graft- versus-host disease prophylaxis in haploidentical transplant.

Authors:  Annalisa Ruggeri; Yuqian Sun; Myriam Labopin; Andrea Bacigalupo; Francesca Lorentino; William Arcese; Stella Santarone; Zafer Gülbas; Didier Blaise; Giuseppe Messina; Ardeshi Ghavamzadeh; Florent Malard; Benedetto Bruno; Jose Luis Diez-Martin; Yener Koc; Fabio Ciceri; Mohamad Mohty; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 10.  Halfway there: the past, present and future of haploidentical transplantation.

Authors:  M Slade; B Fakhri; B N Savani; R Romee
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.