Jørgen Tobias Kühl1, Richard T George2, Vishal C Mehra3, Jesper J Linde4, Marcus Chen5, Andrew E Arai5, Marcelo Di Carli6, Kakuya Kitagawa7, Marc Dewey8, Joao A C Lima2, Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed9. 1. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2012, The Heart Centre, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark tobiaskh@gmail.com. 2. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2012, The Heart Centre, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 6. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan. 8. Charitè Medical School, Humboldt, Berlin, Germany. 9. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2012, The Heart Centre, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
AIM: Previous animal studies have demonstrated differences in perfusion and perfusion reserve between the subendocardium and subepicardium. 320-row computed tomography (CT) with sub-millimetre spatial resolution allows for the assessment of transmural differences in myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) in humans. We aimed to test the hypothesis that MPR in all myocardial layers is determined by age, gender, and cardiovascular risk profile in patients with ischaemic symptoms or equivalent but without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 149 patients enrolled in the CORE320 study with symptoms or signs of myocardial ischaemia and absence of significant CAD by invasive coronary angiography were scanned with static rest and stress CT perfusion. Myocardial attenuation densities were assessed at rest and during adenosine stress, segmented into 3 myocardial layers and 13 segments. MPR was higher in the subepicardium compared with the subendocardium (124% interquartile range [45, 235] vs. 68% [22,102], P < 0.001). Moreover, MPR in the septum was lower than in the inferolateral and anterolateral segments of the myocardium (55% [19, 104] vs. 89% [37, 168] and 124% [54, 270], P < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, high body mass index was significantly associated with reduced MPR in all myocardial layers when adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In symptomatic patients without significant coronary artery stenosis, distinct differences in endocardial-epicardial distribution of perfusion reserve may be demonstrated with static CT perfusion. Low MPR in all myocardial layers was observed specifically in obese patients. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIM: Previous animal studies have demonstrated differences in perfusion and perfusion reserve between the subendocardium and subepicardium. 320-row computed tomography (CT) with sub-millimetre spatial resolution allows for the assessment of transmural differences in myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) in humans. We aimed to test the hypothesis that MPR in all myocardial layers is determined by age, gender, and cardiovascular risk profile in patients with ischaemic symptoms or equivalent but without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 149 patients enrolled in the CORE320 study with symptoms or signs of myocardial ischaemia and absence of significant CAD by invasive coronary angiography were scanned with static rest and stress CT perfusion. Myocardial attenuation densities were assessed at rest and during adenosine stress, segmented into 3 myocardial layers and 13 segments. MPR was higher in the subepicardium compared with the subendocardium (124% interquartile range [45, 235] vs. 68% [22,102], P < 0.001). Moreover, MPR in the septum was lower than in the inferolateral and anterolateral segments of the myocardium (55% [19, 104] vs. 89% [37, 168] and 124% [54, 270], P < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, high body mass index was significantly associated with reduced MPR in all myocardial layers when adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In symptomatic patients without significant coronary artery stenosis, distinct differences in endocardial-epicardial distribution of perfusion reserve may be demonstrated with static CT perfusion. Low MPR in all myocardial layers was observed specifically in obesepatients. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: J Tobias Kühl; Jesper J Linde; Andreas Fuchs; Thomas S Kristensen; Henning Kelbæk; Richard T George; Jens D Hove; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Richard T George; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Rodrigo J Cerci; Andrea L Vavere; Kakuya Kitagawa; Marc Dewey; Carlos E Rochitte; Andrew E Arai; Narinder Paul; Frank J Rybicki; Albert C Lardo; Melvin E Clouse; Joao A C Lima Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Carlos E Rochitte; Richard T George; Marcus Y Chen; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Marc Dewey; Julie M Miller; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Kakuya Kitagawa; Shiro Nakamori; Roger Laham; Andrea L Vavere; Rodrigo J Cerci; Vishal C Mehra; Cesar Nomura; Klaus F Kofoed; Masahiro Jinzaki; Sachio Kuribayashi; Albert de Roos; Michael Laule; Swee Yaw Tan; John Hoe; Narinder Paul; Frank J Rybicki; Jeffery A Brinker; Andrew E Arai; Christopher Cox; Melvin E Clouse; Marcelo F Di Carli; Joao A C Lima Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Richard T George; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Julie M Miller; Kakuya Kitagawa; Hyuk-Jae Chang; David A Bluemke; Lewis Becker; Omair Yousuf; John Texter; Albert C Lardo; João A C Lima Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Daria Frestad Bechsgaard; Ida Gustafsson; Marie Mide Michelsen; Naja Dam Mygind; Kristoffer Flintholm Raft; Jesper James Linde; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed; Fay Yu-Huei Lin; James K Min; Eva Prescott; Jens Dahlgaard Hove Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Marc Dewey; Maria Siebes; Marc Kachelrieß; Klaus F Kofoed; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Konstantin Nikolaou; Wenjia Bai; Andreas Kofler; Robert Manka; Sebastian Kozerke; Amedeo Chiribiri; Tobias Schaeffter; Florian Michallek; Frank Bengel; Stephan Nekolla; Paul Knaapen; Mark Lubberink; Roxy Senior; Meng-Xing Tang; Jan J Piek; Tim van de Hoef; Johannes Martens; Laura Schreiber Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 32.419