Paul E Schutt1, Simon Kung2, Matthew M Clark1, Afton M Koball1, Karen B Grothe1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. kung.simon@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Screening for depressive symptoms is important when evaluating bariatric surgery candidates, as worse outcomes can be seen with higher pre-surgical and post-surgical psychiatric comorbidities. The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) are two widely used depression screening instruments. This study evaluated whether both instruments have similar performance in an outpatient bariatric surgery clinic setting. METHODS: One thousand thirty-four bariatric surgery candidates completed both PHQ-9 and BDI-II whose scores were analyzed in this retrospective study. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated to compare total scores on each instrument. PHQ-9 categories were compared to corresponding BDI-II categories via several different methods. Weighted kappa coefficients were calculated for (1) PHQ-9 and BDI-II categories, (2) scores ≥10 on the PHQ-9 and ≥20 on the BDI-II, and (3) the specific item of suicidality. RESULTS: Spearman's correlation was strong at 0.74. The median PHQ-9 and BDI-II scores were 5 and 9, corresponding to the mild and minimal categories, respectively. Weighted kappa analysis demonstrated a moderate association between depressive symptom categories evaluated using three methods. A moderate to substantial association was found for the suicidality item, with agreement of 92.3 %. CONCLUSIONS: PHQ-9 and BDI-II scores in patients seeking bariatric surgery are closely correlated. Categories of depressive symptom severity and responses to suicidality showed moderate to substantial agreement. When choosing an appropriate depression screening tool, these findings support the use of the PHQ-9 as a viable alternative to the BDI-II in patients seeking bariatric surgery.
BACKGROUND: Screening for depressive symptoms is important when evaluating bariatric surgery candidates, as worse outcomes can be seen with higher pre-surgical and post-surgical psychiatric comorbidities. The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) are two widely used depression screening instruments. This study evaluated whether both instruments have similar performance in an outpatient bariatric surgery clinic setting. METHODS: One thousand thirty-four bariatric surgery candidates completed both PHQ-9 and BDI-II whose scores were analyzed in this retrospective study. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated to compare total scores on each instrument. PHQ-9 categories were compared to corresponding BDI-II categories via several different methods. Weighted kappa coefficients were calculated for (1) PHQ-9 and BDI-II categories, (2) scores ≥10 on the PHQ-9 and ≥20 on the BDI-II, and (3) the specific item of suicidality. RESULTS: Spearman's correlation was strong at 0.74. The median PHQ-9 and BDI-II scores were 5 and 9, corresponding to the mild and minimal categories, respectively. Weighted kappa analysis demonstrated a moderate association between depressive symptom categories evaluated using three methods. A moderate to substantial association was found for the suicidality item, with agreement of 92.3 %. CONCLUSIONS: PHQ-9 and BDI-II scores in patients seeking bariatric surgery are closely correlated. Categories of depressive symptom severity and responses to suicidality showed moderate to substantial agreement. When choosing an appropriate depression screening tool, these findings support the use of the PHQ-9 as a viable alternative to the BDI-II in patients seeking bariatric surgery.
Authors: Simon Kung; Renato D Alarcon; Mark D Williams; Kathleen A Poppe; Mary Jo Moore; Mark A Frye Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Thomas A Wadden; Meghan L Butryn; David B Sarwer; Anthony N Fabricatore; Canice E Crerand; Patti E Lipschutz; Lucy Faulconbridge; Steven Raper; Noel N Williams Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Beatrice P Y Lai; Alan K L Tang; Dominic T S Lee; Alexander S K Yip; Tony K H Chung Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2010-05-21 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Elizabeth M Vaughan; Craig A Johnston; Jennette P Moreno; Lawrence J Cheskin; Gareth R Dutton; Molly Gee; Sarah A Gaussoin; William C Knowler; W Jack Rejeski; Thomas A Wadden; Susan Z Yanovski; John P Foreyt Journal: Obes Sci Pract Date: 2019-12-19
Authors: Piotr Major; Tomasz Stefura; Piotr Małczak; Michał Wysocki; Jan Witowski; Jan Kulawik; Mateusz Wierdak; Magdalena Pisarska; Michał Pędziwiatr; Andrzej Budzyński Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 4.129