Literature DB >> 26340602

Efficacy of viscous budesonide slurry for prevention of esophageal stricture formation after complete endoscopic mucosal resection of short-segment Barrett's neoplasia.

Farzan F Bahin1, Mahesh Jayanna1, Stephen J Williams1, Eric Y T Lee1, Michael J Bourke1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Complete endoscopic resection (CER) of short-segment Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EEA) is a precise staging tool and achieves durable disease control. The major drawback is development of post-endoscopic resection esophageal stricture (PERES). No effective therapy to prevent PERES has been described. Viscous budesonide slurry (VBS) may have a role in the prevention of PERES by suppressing the post-CER inflammatory process. The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy of VBS for the prevention of PERES.
METHODS: Prospective data were collected on patients referred for CER of HGD or EEA. After January 2012, patients routinely received VBS (two 0.5-mg/2-mL budesonide respules mixed with sucralose) twice daily for 6 weeks following each stage of the CER schedule. All patients received high dose proton pump inhibitor therapy for the duration of CER and the following 3 months. Patients had no other intervention to prevent PERES. A validated dysphagia score was used (0 - 4, no dysphagia to aphagia). Endoscopic dilation was performed for dysphagia. Patients receiving VBS were compared with historical controls. The primary endpoint was the need for dilation.
RESULTS: Between January 2008 and January 2015, 104 of 116 eligible patients completed CER. The VBS group (n = 29) and non-VBS group (n = 75) had similar patient, disease, and procedural characteristics. Dilations were needed in 13.8 % vs. 37.3 % (P = 0.03), with a median of one vs. two procedures (P = 0.01), and median dysphagia score during CER of 0 vs. 1 (P = 0.02) in the VBS and non-VBS groups, respectively. No VBS-related adverse events were noted.
CONCLUSION: In this pilot study VBS significantly reduced PERES and shortened the dilation program after CER. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26340602     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  6 in total

1.  Combining endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection to treat neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Ian Holmes; Tressia Hing; Shai Friedland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Autologous esophageal mucosa with polyglycolic acid transplantation and temporary stent implantation can prevent stenosis after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Zhengqi Li; Lizhou Dou; Yueming Zhang; Shun He; Jiqing Zhu; Yan Ke; Xudong Liu; Yumeng Liu; Hoiloi Ng; Guiqi Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

3.  Non-radical, stepwise complete endoscopic resection of Barrett's epithelium in short segment Barrett's esophagus has a low stricture rate.

Authors:  Andreas Koutsoumpas; Lai Mun Wang; Adam A Bailey; Richard Gillies; Robert Marshall; Michael Booth; Bruno Sgromo; Nick Maynard; Barbara Braden
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-12-02

4.  Oral steroid prophylaxis is effective in preventing esophageal strictures after large endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Ratone; Erwan Bories; Fabrice Caillol; Christian Pesenti; Sebastien Godat; Flora Poizat; Chiara De Cassan; Marc Giovannini
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-06

5.  Effectiveness of topical budesonide in preventing esophageal strictures after endoscopic resection of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Steffi Elisabeth Maria van de Ven; Manon J B L Snijders; Marco J Bruno; Arjun Dave Koch
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-11-17

6.  Prevention of Esophageal Strictures After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Promising Therapy Using Carboxymethyl Cellulose Sheets.

Authors:  Guan Way Lua; Jian Tang; Feng Liu; Zhao Shen Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.