Literature DB >> 26340587

Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?

Manuel Perea1,2, Cristina Gil-López2, Victoria Beléndez1, Manuel Carreiras2,3.   

Abstract

An examination of how the word recognition system is able to process handwritten words is fundamental to formulate a comprehensive model of visual word recognition. Previous research has revealed that the magnitude of lexical effects (e.g., the word-frequency effect) is greater with handwritten words than with printed words. In the present lexical decision experiments, we examined whether the quality of handwritten words moderates the recruitment of top-down feedback, as reflected in word-frequency effects. Results showed a reading cost for difficult-to-read and easy-to-read handwritten words relative to printed words. But the critical finding was that difficult-to-read handwritten words, but not easy-to-read handwritten words, showed a greater word-frequency effect than printed words. Therefore, the inherent physical variability of handwritten words does not necessarily boost the magnitude of lexical effects.

Keywords:  Handwritten words; Visual-word recognition; Word frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26340587     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1091016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  1 in total

1.  Would disfluency by any other name still be disfluent? Examining the disfluency effect with cursive handwriting.

Authors:  Jason Geller; Mary L Still; Veronica J Dark; Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.