BACKGROUND: End-of-life care is a complex service. The education of health care providers, patients nearing end of life, and informal caregivers plays a vital role in increasing knowledge about the care options available. This review looks at whether education helps improve outcomes for patients nearing the end of life and for their informal caregivers. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and study the effectiveness of educational interventions for health care providers, patients nearing the end of life, and informal caregivers to improve patient and informal caregiver outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We performed a literature search using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EBM Reviews for studies published from January 1, 2003, to October 31, 2013. REVIEW METHODS: We conducted this review according to published guidelines and using a prespecified protocol. We included primary studies that evaluated any educational intervention in end-of-life care for health care providers, patients, or informal caregivers and measured patient or informal caregiver quality of life using validated scales. RESULTS: The database search yielded 2,468 citations; we included 6 studies in the review. Studies reported on educational interventions for health care providers, patients nearing the end of life, and informal caregivers. After an educational intervention, patients nearing the end of life had better symptom control and informal caregivers had improved quality of life. However, there was no significant change in patient quality of life or pain control, or in informal caregiver or health care provider satisfaction. There was no decrease in resource utilization. LIMITATIONS: Most studies did not report data adequately, did not define "routine care" and were not blinded. Allocation concealment was also inadequately reported. CONCLUSIONS: Based on moderate quality evidence, education of health care providers, patients nearing the end of life, and informal caregivers improved patient symptom control and informal caregiver quality of life.
BACKGROUND: End-of-life care is a complex service. The education of health care providers, patients nearing end of life, and informal caregivers plays a vital role in increasing knowledge about the care options available. This review looks at whether education helps improve outcomes for patients nearing the end of life and for their informal caregivers. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and study the effectiveness of educational interventions for health care providers, patients nearing the end of life, and informal caregivers to improve patient and informal caregiver outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We performed a literature search using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EBM Reviews for studies published from January 1, 2003, to October 31, 2013. REVIEW METHODS: We conducted this review according to published guidelines and using a prespecified protocol. We included primary studies that evaluated any educational intervention in end-of-life care for health care providers, patients, or informal caregivers and measured patient or informal caregiver quality of life using validated scales. RESULTS: The database search yielded 2,468 citations; we included 6 studies in the review. Studies reported on educational interventions for health care providers, patients nearing the end of life, and informal caregivers. After an educational intervention, patients nearing the end of life had better symptom control and informal caregivers had improved quality of life. However, there was no significant change in patient quality of life or pain control, or in informal caregiver or health care provider satisfaction. There was no decrease in resource utilization. LIMITATIONS: Most studies did not report data adequately, did not define "routine care" and were not blinded. Allocation concealment was also inadequately reported. CONCLUSIONS: Based on moderate quality evidence, education of health care providers, patients nearing the end of life, and informal caregivers improved patient symptom control and informal caregiver quality of life.
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Holger J Schünemann; Peter Tugwell; Andre Knottnerus Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Wouter Van Mechelen; Bert Aertgeerts; Karolien De Ceulaer; Bregje Thoonsen; Mieke Vermandere; Franca Warmenhoven; Eric Van Rijswijk; Jan De Lepeleire Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Susan C McMillan; Brent J Small; Michael Weitzner; Ronald Schonwetter; Mary Tittle; Linda Moody; William E Haley Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Frederick J Meyers; Michael Carducci; Matthew J Loscalzo; John Linder; Tamara Greasby; Laurel A Beckett Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Patsy D Treece; Lois Downey; Danae Dotolo; Sarah E Shannon; Anthony L Back; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Marie Bakitas; Kathleen Doyle Lyons; Mark T Hegel; Stefan Balan; Frances C Brokaw; Janette Seville; Jay G Hull; Zhongze Li; Tor D Tosteson; Ira R Byock; Tim A Ahles Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Catherine J Evans; Lucy Ison; Clare Ellis-Smith; Caroline Nicholson; Alessia Costa; Adejoke O Oluyase; Eve Namisango; Anna E Bone; Lisa Jane Brighton; Deokhee Yi; Sarah Combes; Sabrina Bajwah; Wei Gao; Richard Harding; Paul Ong; Irene J Higginson; Matthew Maddocks Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Sue Duke; Natasha Campling; Carl R May; Susi Lund; Neil Lunt; Alison Richardson Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 3.234