| Literature DB >> 26339186 |
Fouad Chiadmi1, Joël Schlatter2.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a solid-phase extraction gas chromatography-selected ion monitoring-mass spectrometry method for the determination of methadone (MDN) and 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) in human plasma. The linear response was obtained over the concentration range from 10 to 2000 ng/mL for MDN and EDDP. The absolute recoveries of MDN and EDDP were 95.9%-98.9% and 94.8%-102.4%, with relative standard deviation (RSD) ranging from 1.8% to 2.7% and 1.8% to 3.9%, respectively. The intra- and interday precisions were found to be less than 5% for both analytes. The limits of detection of MDN and EDDP were 4 and 5 ng/mL, respectively. The presented method was convenient for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies in patients on heroin-assisted MDN therapy.Entities:
Keywords: EDDP; GCMS; human plasma; methadone
Year: 2015 PMID: 26339186 PMCID: PMC4551303 DOI: 10.4137/ACI.S25554
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Chem Insights ISSN: 1177-3901
Figure 1SIM chromatograms of an extracted blank plasma (A) and blank plasma spiked with MDN (B) and EDDP (C).
Intraday accuracy and precision for the determination of MDN and EDDP in human plasma.
| NOMINAL CONCENTRATION (ng/mL) | CALCULATED CONCENTRATION (ng/mL) | ACCURACY (%BIAS) | PRECISION (%CV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methadone | |||
| 30 | 30.088 ± 0.877 | 0.3 | 2.9 |
| 300 | 299.966 ± 8.729 | −0.0 | 2.9 |
| 1500 | 1500.038 ± 64.504 | 0.0 | 4.3 |
| EDDP | |||
| 30 | 29.383 ± 1.019 | −2.1 | 3.5 |
| 300 | 311.444 ± 8.379 | 3.8 | 2.7 |
| 1500 | 1569.223 ± 74.416 | 4.6 | 4.7 |
Note:
Mean ± S.D., n = 6.
Interday accuracy and precision for the determination of MDN and EDDP in human plasma.
| NOMINAL CONCENTRATION (ng/mL) | CALCULATED CONCENTRATION (ng/mL) | ACCURACY (%BIAS) | PRECISION (%CV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methadone | |||
| 30 | 29.490 ± 1.437 | −1.7 | 4.9 |
| 300 | 303.1017 ± 6.366 | 1.03 | 2.1 |
| 1500 | 1510.010 ± 27.381 | 0.7 | 1.8 |
| EDDP | |||
| 30 | 29.017 ± 1.440 | −3.3 | 4.9 |
| 300 | 300.558 ± 11.307 | 0.2 | 3.7 |
| 1500 | 1539.729 ± 42.479 | 2.6 | 2.8 |
Note:
Mean ± S.D., n = 15.
Results of recovery test of EDDP.
| EXPECTED (ng/mL) | RELATIVE RECOVERY | ABSOLUTE RECOVERY | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEAN ± S.D., n = 5 | RECOVERY | RSD | MEAN ± S.D., n = 5 | RECOVERY | RSD | |
| 20 | 20.714 ± 0.695 | 103.6% | 3.6% | 0.948 ± 0.017 | 94.8% | 1.8% |
| 200 | 206.405 ± 8.419 | 103.2% | 3.2% | 1.007 ± 0.033 | 100.7% | 3.3% |
| 2000 | 1992.462 ± 6.893 | 99.6% | 0.4% | 1.024 ± 0.040 | 102.4% | 3.9% |
Results of recovery test of MDN.
| EXPECTED (ng/mL) | RELATIVE RECOVERY | ABSOLUTE RECOVERY | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEAN ± S.D., n = 5 | RECOVERY | RSD | MEAN ± S.D., n = 5 | RECOVERY | RSD | |
| 20 | 21.133 ± 1.812 | 105.6% | 3.6% | 0.959 ± 0.026 | 95.9% | 2.7% |
| 200 | 203.849 ± 7.967 | 101.9% | 3.2% | 0.979 ± 0.025 | 97.4% | 2.6% |
| 2000 | 2001.804 ± 27.892 | 100.0% | 0.4% | 0.989 ± 0.018 | 98.9% | 1.8% |