| Literature DB >> 26339126 |
Thomas Konegger1, Rajesh Patidar2, Rajendra K Bordia3.
Abstract
In this contribution, a low-pressure/low-temperature casting technique for the preparation of novel free-standing macrocellular polymer-derived ceramic support structures is presented. Preceramic polymers (polycarbosilane and poly(vinyl)silazane) are combined with sacrificial porogens (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene microbeads) to yield porous ceramic materials in the Si-C or Si-C-N systems, exhibiting well-defined pore structures after thermal conversion. The planar-disc-type specimens were found to exhibit biaxial flexural strengths of up to 60 MPa. In combination with their observed permeability characteristics, the prepared structures were found to be suitable for potential applications in filtration, catalysis, or membrane science.Entities:
Keywords: Polycarbosilane; Polymer-derived ceramics; Polysilazane; Porosity; Support
Year: 2015 PMID: 26339126 PMCID: PMC4418769 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.03.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Eur Ceram Soc ISSN: 0955-2219 Impact factor: 5.302
Fig. 1Appearance of PCS (a) or PSZ (b) specimens containing UHMW-PE before (left) and after pyrolytic conversion (right).
Fig. 2SEM micrographs of the fracture surface of porous ceramic supports obtained from UHMW-PE-containing PCS (a, b) or PSZ (c, d).
Fig. 3Pore opening size distribution of porous ceramic supports derived from UHMW-PE-containing PCS (a) or PSZ (b), obtained by mercury intrusion porosimetry.
Physical properties of planar disc-shaped polymer-derived ceramic supports. Both average properties and the range are reported, as well as the number of samples tested for each individual property.
| PCS/30 Vol% PE | PSZ/30 Vol% PE | No. of samples | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density (g cm−3) | 1.14 ± 0.03 | 1.16 ± 0.02 | 15 |
| Total porosity | 50.6 ± 1.3 | 42.0 ± 0.7 | 1 |
| Specific surface area (m2 g−1) | 2.50 ± 0.11 | 0.50 ± 0.04 | 1 |
| Flexural strength, B3B (MPa) | 47 ± 13 | 60 ± 16 | 15 |
| Permeability (air) (10−15 m2) | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 9.5 ± 1.5 | 8 |
By mercury intrusion porosimetry; range is estimated based on density data.