Literature DB >> 26338891

Consumption of Honey, Sucrose, and High-Fructose Corn Syrup Produces Similar Metabolic Effects in Glucose-Tolerant and -Intolerant Individuals.

Susan K Raatz1, LuAnn K Johnson2, Matthew J Picklo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Public health recommendations call for a reduction in added sugars; however, controversy exists over whether all nutritive sweeteners produce similar metabolic effects.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the effects of the chronic consumption of 3 nutritive sweeteners [honey, sucrose, and high-fructose corn syrup containing 55% fructose (HFCS55)] on circulating glucose, insulin, lipids, and inflammatory markers; body weight; and blood pressure in individuals with normal glucose tolerance (GT) and those with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).
METHODS: In a crossover design, participants consumed daily, in random order, 50 g carbohydrate from assigned sweeteners for 2 wk with a 2- to 4-wk washout period between treatments. Participants included 28 GT and 27 IGT volunteers with a mean age of 38.9 ± 3.6 y and 52.1 ± 2.7 y, respectively, and a body mass index (in kg/m(2)) of 26 ± 0.8 and 31.5 ± 1.0, respectively. Body weight, blood pressure (BP), serum inflammatory markers, lipids, fasting glucose and insulin, and oral-glucose-tolerance tests (OGTTs) were completed pre- and post-treatment. The OGTT incremental areas under the curve (iAUCs) for glucose and insulin were determined and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) scores were calculated.
RESULTS: Body weight and serum glucose, insulin, inflammatory markers, and total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations were significantly higher in the IGT group than in the GT group at baseline. Glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and the OGTT iAUC for glucose or insulin did not differ by treatment, but all responses were significantly higher in the IGT group compared with the GT group. Body weight was unchanged by treatment. Systolic BP was unchanged, whereas diastolic BP was significantly lower in response to sugar intake across all treatments. An increase in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was observed in the IGT group in response to all sugars. No treatment effect was observed for interleukin 6. HDL cholesterol did not differ as a result of status or treatment. Triglyceride (TG) concentrations increased significantly from pre- to post-treatment in response to all sugars tested.
CONCLUSIONS: Daily intake of 50 g carbohydrate from honey, sucrose, or HFCS55 for 14 d resulted in similar effects on measures of glycemia, lipid metabolism, and inflammation. All 3 increased TG concentrations in both GT and IGT individuals and elevated glycemic and inflammatory responses in the latter. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01371266.
© 2015 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glycemia; high-fructose corn syrup; honey; sucrose; triglycerides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26338891     DOI: 10.3945/jn.115.218016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  14 in total

1.  Cross-sectional association between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and cardiometabolic biomarkers in US women.

Authors:  Zhi Yu; Sylvia H Ley; Qi Sun; Frank B Hu; Vasanti S Malik
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Adverse effects of honey on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and adiponectin concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled cross-over trial.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sadeghi; Masoumeh Akhlaghi; Saedeh Salehi
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2020-04-14

3.  Ketogenic diet benefits body composition and well-being but not performance in a pilot case study of New Zealand endurance athletes.

Authors:  Caryn Zinn; Matthew Wood; Mikki Williden; Simon Chatterton; Ed Maunder
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  High fructose corn syrup induces metabolic dysregulation and altered dopamine signaling in the absence of obesity.

Authors:  Allison M Meyers; Devry Mourra; Jeff A Beeler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Ectopic Fat Accumulation in Distinct Insulin Resistant Phenotypes; Targets for Personalized Nutritional Interventions.

Authors:  Inez Trouwborst; Suzanne M Bowser; Gijs H Goossens; Ellen E Blaak
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-09-04

6.  Effect of Natural Honey on Glycemic Control and Anthropometric Measures of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sadeghi; Saedeh Salehi; Ali Kohanmoo; Masoumeh Akhlaghi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2019-01-15

7.  Fructose-Induced Intestinal Microbiota Shift Following Two Types of Short-Term High-Fructose Dietary Phases.

Authors:  Julia Beisner; Anita Gonzalez-Granda; Maryam Basrai; Antje Damms-Machado; Stephan C Bischoff
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Dietary Pattern and Macronutrients Profile on the Variation of Inflammatory Biomarkers: Scientific Update.

Authors:  Brenda Kelly Souza Silveira; Thatianne Moreira Silva Oliveira; Patrícia Amaro Andrade; Helen Hermana Miranda Hermsdorff; Carla de Oliveira Barbosa Rosa; Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 9.  Effect of Dietary Sugar Intake on Biomarkers of Subclinical Inflammation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies.

Authors:  Karen W Della Corte; Ines Perrar; Katharina J Penczynski; Lukas Schwingshackl; Christian Herder; Anette E Buyken
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Honey and Its Phenolic Compounds as an Effective Natural Medicine for Cardiovascular Diseases in Humans?

Authors:  Beata Olas
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.