Literature DB >> 26338826

SETD2 histone modifier loss in aggressive GI stromal tumours.

Kie Kyon Huang1,2, John R McPherson2, Su Ting Tay2, Kakoli Das2, Iain Beehuat Tan3,4, Cedric Chuan Young Ng5, Na-Yu Chia2, Shen Li Zhang2, Swe Swe Myint5, Longyu Hu1,2, Vikneswari Rajasegaran5, Dachuan Huang5, Jia Liang Loh5, Anna Gan5, Alisa Noor Hidayah Sairi3, Xin Xiu Sam6, Lourdes Trinidad Dominguez3, Minghui Lee2, Khee Chee Soo7, London Lucien Peng Jin Ooi8, Hock Soo Ong9, Alexander Chung8, Pierce Kah-Hoe Chow7,10,11, Wai Keong Wong9, Sathiyamoorthy Selvarajan6, Choon Kiat Ong5, Kiat Hon Lim6, Tannistha Nandi4, Steve Rozen2, Bin Tean Teh1,2,5, Richard Quek3, Patrick Tan1,2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: GI stromal tumours (GISTs) are clinically heterogenous exhibiting varying degrees of disease aggressiveness in individual patients.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify genetic alterations associated with high-risk GIST, explore their molecular consequences, and test their utility as prognostic markers. DESIGNS: Exome sequencing of 18 GISTs was performed (9 patients with high-risk/metastatic and 5 patients with low/intermediate-risk), corresponding to 11 primary and 7 metastatic tumours. Candidate alterations were validated by prevalence screening in an independent patient cohort (n=120). Functional consequences of SETD2 mutations were investigated in primary tissues and cell lines. Transcriptomic profiles for 8 GISTs (4 SETD2 mutated, 4 SETD2 wild type) and DNA methylation profiles for 22 GISTs (10 SETD2 mutated, 12 SETD2 wild type) were analysed. Statistical associations between molecular, clinicopathological factors, and relapse-free survival were determined.
RESULTS: High-risk GISTs harboured increased numbers of somatic mutations compared with low-risk GISTs (25.2 mutations/high-risk cases vs 6.8 mutations/low-risk cases; two sample t test p=3.1×10-5). Somatic alterations in the SETD2 histone modifier gene occurred in 3 out of 9 high-risk/metastatic cases but no low/intermediate-risk cases. Prevalence screening identified additional SETD2 mutations in 7 out of 80 high-risk/metastatic cases but no low/intermediate-risk cases (n=29). Combined, the frequency of SETD2 mutations was 11.2% (10/89) and 0% (0/34) in high-risk and low-risk GISTs respectively. SETD2 mutant GISTs exhibited decreased H3K36me3 expression while SETD2 silencing promoted DNA damage in GIST-T1 cells. In gastric GISTs, SETD2 mutations were associated with overexpression of HOXC cluster genes and a DNA methylation signature of hypomethylated heterochromatin. Gastric GISTs with SETD2 mutations, or GISTs with hypomethylated heterochromatin, showed significantly shorter relapse-free survival on univariate analysis (log rank p=4.1×10-5).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that SETD2 is a novel GIST tumour suppressor gene associated with disease progression. Assessing SETD2 genetic status and SETD2-associated epigenomic phenotypes may guide risk stratification and provide insights into mechanisms of GIST clinical aggressiveness. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER; GENE MUTATION

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26338826     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  21 in total

Review 1.  SETting the Stage for Cancer Development: SETD2 and the Consequences of Lost Methylation.

Authors:  Catherine C Fahey; Ian J Davis
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  H3K36 methyltransferases as cancer drug targets: rationale and perspectives for inhibitor development.

Authors:  David S Rogawski; Jolanta Grembecka; Tomasz Cierpicki
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.808

3.  Histone methyltransferase SETD2 modulates alternative splicing to inhibit intestinal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Huairui Yuan; Ni Li; Da Fu; Jiale Ren; Jingyi Hui; Junjie Peng; Yongfeng Liu; Tong Qiu; Min Jiang; Qiang Pan; Ying Han; Xiaoming Wang; Qintong Li; Jun Qin
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Margaret von Mehren; Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  [Quantitative proteomics and differential signal enrichment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells with or without SETD2 gene knockout].

Authors:  Yumei Zeng; Sisi Wang; Muyin Feng; Zhongming Shao; Jianling Yuan; Zhihua Shen; Wei Jie
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-10-30

Review 6.  Molecular characterization and pathogenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Takeshi Niinuma; Hiromu Suzuki; Tamotsu Sugai
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-01-09

7.  High-density array-CGH with targeted NGS unmask multiple noncontiguous minute deletions on chromosome 3p21 in mesothelioma.

Authors:  Yoshie Yoshikawa; Mitsuru Emi; Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki; Masaki Ohmuraya; Ayuko Sato; Tohru Tsujimura; Seiki Hasegawa; Takashi Nakano; Masaki Nasu; Sandra Pastorino; Agata Szymiczek; Angela Bononi; Mika Tanji; Ian Pagano; Giovanni Gaudino; Andrea Napolitano; Chandra Goparaju; Harvey I Pass; Haining Yang; Michele Carbone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mutational inactivation of mTORC1 repressor gene DEPDC5 in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Yuzhi Pang; Feifei Xie; Hui Cao; Chunmeng Wang; Meijun Zhu; Xiaoxiao Liu; Xiaojing Lu; Tao Huang; Yanying Shen; Ke Li; Xiaona Jia; Zhang Li; Xufen Zheng; Simin Wang; Yi He; Linhui Wang; Jonathan A Fletcher; Yuexiang Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Molecular biomarkers for prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  X Liu; K-M Chu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 10.  Histone lysine methyltransferases in biology and disease.

Authors:  Dylan Husmann; Or Gozani
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.