Literature DB >> 26338802

Denosumab treated giant cell tumour of bone: a morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of a series.

Ilaria Girolami1, Irene Mancini2, Antonella Simoni1, Giacomo Giulio Baldi3, Lisa Simi2, Domenico Campanacci4, Giovanni Beltrami4, Guido Scoccianti4, Antonio D'Arienzo4, Rodolfo Capanna4, Alessandro Franchi1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against RANKL, has recently been introduced in the treatment strategy of giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). Aim of this study was to investigate the phenotypical modifications induced by denosumab treatment in a series of 15 GCTB.
METHODS: The tumours were characterised for histone 3.3 mutations, and studied immunohistochemically for the modifications of RANKL, RANK, SATB2 and RUNX2 expression, as well as of tumour proliferative activity and angiogenesis.
RESULTS: Nine of 11 tumours investigated presented a histone 3.3 mutation in H3F3A, and 2 of these for which the analysis was carried out in pretreatment and post-treatment specimens showed the same mutation in both. Denosumab induced the disappearance of osteoclast-like giant cells, leaving residual spindle neoplastic cells arranged in a storiform pattern, with deposition of trabecular collagen matrix and osteoid, which tended to maturation in the peripheral portions of the lesion. RANK and RANKL expression was variable, with no significant variation after treatment. Moreover, we did not observe any significant modification of the expression of the osteoblastic markers SATB2 and RUNX2. Denosumab treatment determined a significant reduction of the proliferative index and of tumour angiogenesis (p=0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test).
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that denosumab induces a partial maturation towards the osteoblastic phenotype of the neoplastic cells of GCTB, with production of fibrous and osteoid matrix, but with minor immunophenotypical changes. Finally, we first report an antiangiogenic activity of denosumab in GCTB, possibly mediated by a RANKL-dependent pathway. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  BONE TUMOURS; CANCER GENETICS; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26338802     DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  28 in total

1.  Giant cell tumor of soft tissue is genetically distinct from its bone counterpart.

Authors:  Jen-Chieh Lee; Cher-Wei Liang; Christopher Dm Fletcher
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Giant cell tumor of bone: imaging and histology changes after denosumab treatment : Comment on: von Borstel D, Taguibao RA, Strle NA, Burns JE. Giant cell tumor of the bone: Aggressive case initially treated with denosumab and intralesional surgery. Skeletal Radiol 2017;46:571-578.

Authors:  Yaxia Zhang; Hakan Ilaslan; Thomas W Bauer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Prognosis of local recurrence in giant cell tumour of bone: what can we do?

Authors:  Yifeng He; Ji Zhang; Xiaoyi Ding
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Denosumab does not decrease the risk of lung metastases from bone giant cell tumour.

Authors:  Shinji Tsukamoto; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Giulio Leone; Alberto Righi; Manabu Akahane; Piergiuseppe Tanzi; Akira Kido; Kanya Honoki; Yasuhito Tanaka; Davide Maria Donati; Costantino Errani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Integration of denosumab therapy in the management of giant cell tumors of bone.

Authors:  Daniel T Miles; Ryan T Voskuil; Wood Dale; Joel L Mayerson; Thomas J Scharschmidt
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-28

6.  A prospective study on predicting local recurrence of giant cell tumour of bone by evaluating preoperative imaging features of the tumour around the knee joint.

Authors:  Yifeng He; Jun Wang; Ji Zhang; Fei Yuan; Xiaoyi Ding
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  Histone H3.3 mutation in giant cell tumor of bone: an update in pathology.

Authors:  Hidetaka Yamamoto; Shin Ishihara; Yu Toda; Yoshinao Oda
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 8.  Denosumab in Patients with Giant Cell Tumor and Its Recurrence: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Khodamorad Jamshidi; Mohamad Gharehdaghi; Sami Sam Hajialiloo; Masoud Mirkazemi; Kamran Ghaffarzadehgan; Azra Izanloo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-07

9.  Immunohistochemistry for histone H3G34W and H3K36M is highly specific for giant cell tumor of bone and chondroblastoma, respectively, in FNA and core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Inga-Marie Schaefer; Jonathan A Fletcher; G Petur Nielsen; Angela R Shih; Marco L Ferrone; Jason L Hornick; Xiaohua Qian
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Soft Tissue Special Issue: Giant Cell-Rich Lesions of the Head and Neck Region.

Authors:  Jen-Chieh Lee; Hsuan-Ying Huang
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2020-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.