Literature DB >> 26338339

Altering Effort Costs in Parkinson's Disease with Noninvasive Cortical Stimulation.

Yousef Salimpour1, Zoltan K Mari2, Reza Shadmehr3.   

Abstract

In Parkinson's disease (PD), the human brain is capable of producing motor commands, but appears to require greater than normal subjective effort, particularly for the more-affected side. What is the nature of this subjective effort and can it be altered? We used an isometric task in which patients produced a goal force by engaging both arms, but were free to assign any fraction of that force to each arm. The patients preferred their less-affected arm, but only in some directions. This preference was correlated with lateralization of signal-dependent noise: the direction of force for which the brain was less willing to assign effort to an arm was generally the direction for which that arm exhibited greater noise. Therefore, the direction-dependent noise in each arm acted as an implicit cost that discouraged use of that arm. To check for a causal relationship between noise and motor cost, we used bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex, placing the cathode on the more-affected side and the anode on the less-affected side. This stimulation not only reduced the noise on the more-affected arm, it also increased the willingness of the patients to assign force to that arm. In a 3 d double-blind study and in a 10 d repeated stimulation study, bilateral stimulation of the two motor cortices with cathode on the more-affected side reduced noise and increased the willingness of the patients to exert effort. This stimulation also improved the clinical motor symptoms of the disease. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In Parkinson's disease, patients are less willing to assign force to their affected arm. Here, we find that this pattern is direction dependent: directions for which the arm is noisier coincide with directions for which the brain is less willing to assign force. We hypothesized that if we could reduce the noise on the affected arm, then we may increase the willingness for the brain to assign force to that arm. We found a way to do this via noninvasive cortical stimulation. In addition to reducing effort costs associated with the affected arm, the cortical stimulation also improved clinical motor symptoms of the disease.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3512287-16$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Parkinson's disease; motor costs; signal-dependent noise; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26338339      PMCID: PMC4556793          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1827-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  Dissociation between hand motion and population vectors from neural activity in motor cortex.

Authors:  S H Scott; P L Gribble; K M Graham; D W Cabel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Changes in the temporal pattern of primary motor cortex activity in a directional isometric force versus limb movement task.

Authors:  L E Sergio; J F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning.

Authors:  Brita Fritsch; Janine Reis; Keri Martinowich; Heidi M Schambra; Yuanyuan Ji; Leonardo G Cohen; Bai Lu
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Clinician accessible tools for GUI computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation: BONSAI and SPHERES.

Authors:  Dennis Q Truong; Mathias Hüber; Xihe Xie; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Lucas C Parra; Jacek P Dmochowski; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Haloperidol and nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion suppress lever pressing for food but increase free food consumption in a novel food choice procedure.

Authors:  J D Salamone; R E Steinpreis; L D McCullough; P Smith; D Grebel; K Mahan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Immediate effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on postural stability and functional mobility in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Geert Verheyden; Joanne Purdey; Malcolm Burnett; Jonathan Cole; Ann Ashburn
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 10.338

10.  Transient stimulation of distinct subpopulations of striatal neurons mimics changes in action value.

Authors:  Lung-Hao Tai; A Moses Lee; Nora Benavidez; Antonello Bonci; Linda Wilbrecht
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  7 in total

1.  Vigor of reaching movements: reward discounts the cost of effort.

Authors:  Erik M Summerside; Reza Shadmehr; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Dopamine-Dependent Loss Aversion during Effort-Based Decision-Making.

Authors:  Xiuli Chen; Sarah Voets; Ned Jenkinson; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sensorimotor Cortex GABA Moderates the Relationship between Physical Exertion and Assessments of Effort.

Authors:  Eric J Hu; Agostina Casamento-Moran; Joseph K Galaro; Kimberly L Chan; Richard A E Edden; Nicolaas A J Puts; Vikram S Chib
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alicia M Goodwill; Jarrad A G Lum; Ashlee M Hendy; Makii Muthalib; Liam Johnson; Natalia Albein-Urios; Wei-Peng Teo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Insula as the Interface Between Body Awareness and Movement: A Neurofeedback-Guided Kinesthetic Motor Imagery Study in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Sule Tinaz; Kiran Para; Ana Vives-Rodriguez; Valeria Martinez-Kaigi; Keerthana Nalamada; Mine Sezgin; Dustin Scheinost; Michelle Hampson; Elan D Louis; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Paloma Cristina Alves de Oliveira; Thiago Anderson Brito de Araújo; Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado; Abner Cardoso Rodrigues; Marom Bikson; Suellen Marinho Andrade; Alexandre Hideki Okano; Hougelle Simplicio; Rodrigo Pegado; Edgard Morya
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Sequence Effect in Parkinson's Disease Is Related to Motor Energetic Cost.

Authors:  Sule Tinaz; Ajay S Pillai; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.