Literature DB >> 26338075

Comparison of pterygomaxillary dysjunction with tuberosity separation in isolated Le Fort I osteotomies: a prospective, multi-centre, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial.

A Christabel1, P Anantanarayanan2, P Subash3, C L Soh4, M Ramanathan2, M R Muthusekhar4, V Narayanan4.   

Abstract

The aim of this trial was to compare two techniques of maxillary dysjunction, with 10mg/kg tranexamic acid as an adjuvant, in isolated non-segmented Le Fort I procedures. Two hundred patients were randomized to one of four groups: group A, pterygomaxillary dysjunction+saline; group B, tuberosity separation+saline; group C, pterygomaxillary dysjunction+tranexamic acid; and group D, tuberosity separation+tranexamic acid. Primary outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss and operating time, while the secondary outcome measures were surgical field assessment, need for blood transfusion, and duration of hospitalization. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (SPSS v. 17.0), and the level of significance was set at P<0.05. Results revealed that group D (tuberosity separation+tranexamic acid) had the least blood loss (mean 172 ml) and shortest operating times (mean 49 min), with the best surgical field. This group also exhibited the lowest drop in postoperative haemoglobin concentration (Hbgm/dl) and packed cell volume (PCV). Five patients, all in group A, required a blood transfusion and had an extra 24h of hospitalization. This trial revealed that the tuberosity separation technique with the use of tranexamic acid was the best protocol in producing the least blood loss, minimizing the operating time, and providing the best surgical field.
Copyright © 2015 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Le Fort I osteotomy; blood loss; pterygoid dysjunction; tuberosity separation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26338075     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  5 in total

Review 1.  Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Manikandhan Ramanathan; Godwin Alex Kiruba; Amelia Christabel; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran; Sanjanaa Kapoor; Hermann F Sailer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-21

2.  Prevalence of systemic diseases in patients undergoing minor oral surgeries.

Authors:  Anisha Mahtani; M P Santhosh
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2020-12-31

3.  Assessment of post extraction complications in Indians.

Authors:  Keerthika Saravanan; M P Santhosh Kumar
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Linear and angular measurement using cone-beam computed tomography to enhance safety in Le Fort I osteotomy with tuberosity cut.

Authors:  Liuling Hui; Kuo Feng Hung; Michael Marc Bornstein; Yiu Yan Leung
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Liang Sun; Rui Guo; Yi Feng
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 0.947

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.