Literature DB >> 26337839

Reliable recording and analysis of MEG-based corticokinematic coherence in the presence of strong magnetic artifacts.

Mathieu Bourguignon1, Stephen Whitmarsh2, Harri Piitulainen3, Riitta Hari3, Veikko Jousmäki3, Daniel Lundqvist2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Corticokinematic coherence (CKC) is the coupling between magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signals and limb kinematics during fast movements. Our objective was to assess the robustness of CKC-based identification of the primary sensorimotor (SM1) cortex of subjects producing strong magnetic artifacts when the MEG signals were cleaned with temporal signal space separation (tSSS).
METHODS: We recorded MEG during active and passive forefinger movements and during median-nerve stimulation in the following conditions: (1) artifact-free, (2) a magnetic wire attached to the scalp at C3 location, and (3) a magnetic wire attached behind the lower central incisors. Data were pre-processed with tSSS and analyzed using standard CKC methods, somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs), and dipole modeling. RESULT: Artifacts were effectively suppressed by tSSS, enabling successful identification of the SM1 cortex in all subjects based on CKC and SEFs. The sources were in artifact conditions ∼5 mm away from the sources identified in artifact-free conditions.
CONCLUSION: tSSS suppressed artifacts strongly enough to enable reliable identification of the SM1 cortex on the basis of CKC mapping, with localization accuracy comparable to SEF-based mapping. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that CKC can be used for SM1 cortex identification and for studies of proprioception even in patients implanted with magnetic material.
Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifacts; Corticokinematic coherence; Functional mapping; Human brain; Magnetoencephalography; Proprioception; Signal-space separation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26337839     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  6 in total

Review 1.  IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Riitta Hari; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth Barnes; Richard Burgess; Nina Forss; Joachim Gross; Matti Hämäläinen; Ole Jensen; Ryusuke Kakigi; François Mauguière; Nobukatzu Nakasato; Aina Puce; Gian-Luca Romani; Alfons Schnitzler; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Assessing Brain-Muscle Connectivity in Human Locomotion through Mobile Brain/Body Imaging: Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Federico Gennaro; Eling D de Bruin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-02-26

3.  Localization of Sensorimotor Cortex Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Minna Pitkänen; Shogo Yazawa; Katja Airaksinen; Pantelis Lioumis; Jussi Nurminen; Eero Pekkonen; Jyrki P Mäkelä
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  Gratifying Gizmos for Research and Clinical MEG.

Authors:  Veikko Jousmäki
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  More comprehensive proprioceptive stimulation of the hand amplifies its cortical processing.

Authors:  Maria Hakonen; Timo Nurmi; Jaakko Vallinoja; Julia Jaatela; Harri Piitulainen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.974

6.  Cortical Proprioceptive Processing Is Altered by Aging.

Authors:  Harri Piitulainen; Santtu Seipäjärvi; Janne Avela; Tiina Parviainen; Simon Walker
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.