Literature DB >> 26337548

Exploring Massive Incomplete Lineage Sorting in Arctoids (Laurasiatheria, Carnivora).

Liliya Doronina1, Gennady Churakov2, Jingjing Shi3, Jürgen Brosius4, Robert Baertsch5, Hiram Clawson5, Jürgen Schmitz1.   

Abstract

Freed from the competition of large raptors, Paleocene carnivores could expand their newly acquired habitats in search of prey. Such changing conditions might have led to their successful distribution and rapid radiation. Today, molecular evolutionary biologists are faced, however, with the consequences of such accelerated adaptive radiations, because they led to sequential speciation more rapidly than phylogenetic markers could be fixed. The repercussions being that current genealogies based on such markers are incongruent with species trees.Our aim was to explore such conflicting phylogenetic zones of evolution during the early arctoid radiation, especially to distinguish diagnostic from misleading phylogenetic signals, and to examine other carnivore-related speciation events. We applied a combination of high-throughput computational strategies to screen carnivore and related genomes in silico for randomly inserted retroposed elements that we then used to identify inconsistent phylogenetic patterns in the Arctoidea group, which is well known for phylogenetic discordances.Our combined retrophylogenomic and in vitro wet lab approach detected hundreds of carnivore-specific insertions, many of them confirming well-established splits or identifying and solving conflicting species distributions. Our systematic genome-wide screens for Long INterspersed Elements detected homoplasy-free markers with insertion-specific truncation points that we used to distinguish phylogenetically informative markers from conflicting signals. The results were independently confirmed by phylogenetic diagnostic Short INterspersed Elements. As statistical analysis ruled out ancestral hybridization, these doubly verified but still conflicting patterns were statistically determined to be genomic remnants from a time of ancestral incomplete lineage sorting that especially accompanied large parts of Arctoidea evolution.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arctoidea; Carnivora; Pholidota; phylogeny; retrogenomics; retrophylogenomics; retroposition; truncated LINEs

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26337548     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msv188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  16 in total

1.  Whole-Genome Analyses Resolve the Phylogeny of Flightless Birds (Palaeognathae) in the Presence of an Empirical Anomaly Zone.

Authors:  Alison Cloutier; Timothy B Sackton; Phil Grayson; Michele Clamp; Allan J Baker; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Reunion of Australasian Possums by Shared SINE Insertions.

Authors:  Liliya Doronina; Charles Y Feigin; Jürgen Schmitz
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 9.160

3.  The devil is in the details: Transposable element analysis of the Tasmanian devil genome.

Authors:  Maria A Nilsson
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2015-12-04

4.  High-quality carnivoran genomes from roadkill samples enable comparative species delineation in aardwolf and bat-eared fox.

Authors:  Rémi Allio; Marie-Ka Tilak; Celine Scornavacca; Nico L Avenant; Andrew C Kitchener; Erwan Corre; Benoit Nabholz; Frédéric Delsuc
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Neo-darwinism still haunts evolutionary theory: A modern perspective on Charlesworth, Lande, and Slatkin (1982).

Authors:  Zachary B Hancock; Emma S Lehmberg; Gideon S Bradburd
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Incomplete Lineage Sorting and Hybridization Statistics for Large-Scale Retroposon Insertion Data.

Authors:  Andrej Kuritzin; Tabea Kischka; Jürgen Schmitz; Gennady Churakov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Speciation network in Laurasiatheria: retrophylogenomic signals.

Authors:  Liliya Doronina; Gennady Churakov; Andrej Kuritzin; Jingjing Shi; Robert Baertsch; Hiram Clawson; Jürgen Schmitz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The Beaver's Phylogenetic Lineage Illuminated by Retroposon Reads.

Authors:  Liliya Doronina; Andreas Matzke; Gennady Churakov; Monika Stoll; Andreas Huge; Jürgen Schmitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Determining the Position of Storks on the Phylogenetic Tree of Waterbirds by Retroposon Insertion Analysis.

Authors:  Tae Kuramoto; Hidenori Nishihara; Maiko Watanabe; Norihiro Okada
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Resolving kangaroo phylogeny and overcoming retrotransposon ascertainment bias.

Authors:  William G Dodt; Susanne Gallus; Matthew J Phillips; Maria A Nilsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.