Jens von Berg1, Stewart Young2, Heike Carolus2, Robin Wolz3, Axel Saalbach2, Alberto Hidalgo4, Ana Giménez4, Tomás Franquet4. 1. Digital Imaging, Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany. jens.von.berg@philips.com. 2. Digital Imaging, Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Clinical Science, Diagnostix X-Ray, Philips Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Department of Radiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Carrer de Sant Quintí, 89, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Suppressing thoracic bone shadows in chest radiographs has been previously reported to improve the detection rates for solid lung nodules, however at the cost of increased false detection rates. These bone suppression methods are based on an artificial neural network that was trained using dual-energy subtraction images in order to mimic their appearance. METHOD: Here, a novel approach is followed where all bone shadows crossing the lung field are suppressed sequentially leaving the intercostal space unaffected. Given a contour delineating a bone, its image region is spatially transferred to separate normal image gradient components from tangential component. Smoothing the normal partial gradient along the contour results in a reconstruction of the image representing the bone shadow only, because all other overlaid signals tend to cancel out each other in this representation. RESULTS: The method works even with highly contrasted overlaid objects such as a pacemaker. The approach was validated in a reader study with two experienced chest radiologists, and these images helped improving both the sensitivity and the specificity of the readers for the detection and localization of solid lung nodules. The AUC improved significantly from 0.596 to 0.655 on a basis of 146 images from patients and normals with a total of 123 confirmed lung nodules. CONCLUSION: Subtracting all reconstructed bone shadows from the original image results in a soft image where lung nodules are no longer obscured by bone shadows. Both the sensitivity and the specificity of experienced radiologists increased.
PURPOSE: Suppressing thoracic bone shadows in chest radiographs has been previously reported to improve the detection rates for solid lung nodules, however at the cost of increased false detection rates. These bone suppression methods are based on an artificial neural network that was trained using dual-energy subtraction images in order to mimic their appearance. METHOD: Here, a novel approach is followed where all bone shadows crossing the lung field are suppressed sequentially leaving the intercostal space unaffected. Given a contour delineating a bone, its image region is spatially transferred to separate normal image gradient components from tangential component. Smoothing the normal partial gradient along the contour results in a reconstruction of the image representing the bone shadow only, because all other overlaid signals tend to cancel out each other in this representation. RESULTS: The method works even with highly contrasted overlaid objects such as a pacemaker. The approach was validated in a reader study with two experienced chest radiologists, and these images helped improving both the sensitivity and the specificity of the readers for the detection and localization of solid lung nodules. The AUC improved significantly from 0.596 to 0.655 on a basis of 146 images from patients and normals with a total of 123 confirmed lung nodules. CONCLUSION: Subtracting all reconstructed bone shadows from the original image results in a soft image where lung nodules are no longer obscured by bone shadows. Both the sensitivity and the specificity of experienced radiologists increased.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone suppression; Lung nodule; Radiography; Thorax
Authors: J Shiraishi; S Katsuragawa; J Ikezoe; T Matsumoto; T Kobayashi; K Komatsu; M Matsui; H Fujita; Y Kodera; K Doi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Steven Schalekamp; Bram van Ginneken; Louis Meiss; Liesbeth Peters-Bax; Lorentz G B A Quekel; Miranda M Snoeren; Audrey M Tiehuis; Rianne Wittenberg; Nico Karssemeijer; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Feng Li; Roger Engelmann; Lorenzo L Pesce; Kunio Doi; Charles E Metz; Heber Macmahon Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Samuel G Armato; Geoffrey McLennan; Luc Bidaut; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Charles R Meyer; Anthony P Reeves; Binsheng Zhao; Denise R Aberle; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber MacMahon; Edwin J R Van Beeke; David Yankelevitz; Alberto M Biancardi; Peyton H Bland; Matthew S Brown; Roger M Engelmann; Gary E Laderach; Daniel Max; Richard C Pais; David P Y Qing; Rachael Y Roberts; Amanda R Smith; Adam Starkey; Poonam Batrah; Philip Caligiuri; Ali Farooqi; Gregory W Gladish; C Matilda Jude; Reginald F Munden; Iva Petkovska; Leslie E Quint; Lawrence H Schwartz; Baskaran Sundaram; Lori E Dodd; Charles Fenimore; David Gur; Nicholas Petrick; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Brian Hughes; Alessi Vande Casteele; Sangeeta Gupte; Maha Sallamm; Michael D Heath; Michael H Kuhn; Ekta Dharaiya; Richard Burns; David S Fryd; Marcos Salganicoff; Vikram Anand; Uri Shreter; Stephen Vastagh; Barbara Y Croft Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Alexander Schick; Jennifer L Cullmann; Lukas Ebner; Boglarka Megyeri; Peter Vock; Andreas Christe Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Ronald D Novak; Nicholas J Novak; Robert Gilkeson; Bahar Mansoori; Gunhild E Aandal Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Steven Schalekamp; Bram van Ginneken; Inge A H van den Berk; Ieneke J C Hartmann; Miranda M Snoeren; Arlette E Odink; Winnifred van Lankeren; Sjoert A H Pegge; Laura J Schijf; Nico Karssemeijer; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ngo Fung Daniel Lam; Hongfei Sun; Liming Song; Dongrong Yang; Shaohua Zhi; Ge Ren; Pak Hei Chou; Shiu Bun Nelson Wan; Man Fung Esther Wong; King Kwong Chan; Hoi Ching Hailey Tsang; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Jing Qin; Lawrence Wing Chi Chan; Michael Ying; Jing Cai Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2022-07
Authors: Kai Scherer; Andre Yaroshenko; Deniz Ali Bölükbas; Lukas B Gromann; Katharina Hellbach; Felix G Meinel; Margarita Braunagel; Jens von Berg; Oliver Eickelberg; Maximilian F Reiser; Franz Pfeiffer; Silke Meiners; Julia Herzen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 4.379