Literature DB >> 26337393

Phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas: A difference in disease behaviour and clinical outcomes.

Tarek Ezzat Abdel-Aziz1,2, Francesco Prete1, Gerard Conway3, Mark Gaze3, Jamshed Bomanji3, Pierre Bouloux4, Bernard Khoo4, Martyn Caplin4, Imran Mushtaq1, James Smart1, Tom R Kurzawinski1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas arise from the same chromaffin cell, but evidence suggests they do not represent a single clinical entity. The aim of this study was to compare clinical presentations, outcomes of surgical and oncological treatments and survival in patients with phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas.
METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients treated for these conditions at our centre between 1983 and 2012.
RESULTS: One hundred and six patients (88 adults, 18 children) with phaeochromocytoma (n = 83) or paraganglioma (n = 23) were studied. Catecholamine symptoms and incidentalomas were the main presentations in phaeochromocytoma patients (67% and 17%) respectively, but in those with paragangliomas pain (39%) was more common (P < 0.001). More paragangliomas were malignant (14/23 vs 9/83, P < 0.0001), larger (9.17 ± 4.95 cm vs. 5.8 ± 3.44 cm, P = 0.001) and had a higher rate of conversion to open surgery (P = <0.01), more R2 resections, more postoperative complications and a longer hospital stay (P = 0.014). MIBG uptake in malignant paragangliomas was lower than in malignant phaeochromocytomas (36% vs. 100%, P = 0.002) and disease stabilisation was achieved in 29% and 86% of patients respectively. (90) Y-DOTA-octreotate had a 78% response rate in malignant paragangliomas.
CONCLUSION: The clinical differences between paragangliomas and phaeochromocytomas support the view that they should be considered as separate clinical entities.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adrenalectomy; laparoscopy; malignancy; paraganglioma; phaeochromocytoma; radio-targeted therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26337393     DOI: 10.1002/jso.24030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  6 in total

1.  A rare case of retroperitoneal paraganglioma-case report and literature review.

Authors:  Peng Li; Dongbing Zhao
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-18

2.  SDHB mutation status and tumor size but not tumor grade are important predictors of clinical outcome in pheochromocytoma and abdominal paraganglioma.

Authors:  Yasmine Assadipour; Samira M Sadowski; Meghna Alimchandani; Martha Quezado; Seth M Steinberg; Naris Nilubol; Dhaval Patel; Tamara Prodanov; Karel Pacak; Electron Kebebew
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Outcomes of patients with metastatic phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oksana Hamidi; William F Young; Lucinda Gruber; John Smestad; Qi Yan; Oscar J Ponce; Larry Prokop; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Irina Bancos
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 4.  Head and Neck Paragangliomas: An Update on the Molecular Classification, State-of-the-Art Imaging, and Management Recommendations.

Authors:  Edward P Lin; Bennett B Chin; Lauren Fishbein; Toshio Moritani; Simone P Montoya; Shehanaz Ellika; Shawn Newlands
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2022-05

Review 5.  Current Consensus on I-131 MIBG Therapy.

Authors:  Daiki Kayano; Seigo Kinuya
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-03

6.  Imaging of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.

Authors:  Jorge A Carrasquillo; Clara C Chen; Abhishek Jha; Alexander Ling; Frank I Lin; Daniel A Pryma; Karel Pacak
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 10.057

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.