Literature DB >> 26337262

Why such differing stances? A review of position statements on home birth from professional colleges.

S Roome1, D Hartz2,3, S Tracy2,4, A W Welsh1,5.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Despite low rates of home birth throughout most Western countries, the topic generates considerable debate. This is reflected by the differing positions on home birth adopted by professional colleges representing obstetricians and midwives. We reviewed position statements of midwifery and obstetric colleges in the UK, USA, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada to explore how the same body of research evidence leads to different positions. Aside from a joint statement from the UK we found widely differing stances, reflecting traditional midwifery perspectives of birth as a physiological process versus obstetric perspectives of potential pathology. We feel the differences in position statements are largely the end product of significant confirmatory bias. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Review of organisational position on home birth suggests bias in literature interpretation.
© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Keywords:  Confirmatory bias; obstetric and midwifery colleges; planned home birth

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26337262     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  4 in total

1.  Understanding Recent Home-Birth Research: An Interview With Drs. Melissa Cheyney and Jonathan Snowden.

Authors:  Melissa Cheyney
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2016

2.  Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: Impact on access, equity, and outcomes.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Kathrin Stoll; Marian MacDorman; Eugene Declercq; Renee Cramer; Melissa Cheyney; Timothy Fisher; Emma Butt; Y Tony Yang; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Is it Time to Ask Whether Facility Based Birth is Safe for Low Risk Women and Their Babies?

Authors:  Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-08-09

4.  Factors influencing the utilisation of free-standing and alongside midwifery units in England: a qualitative research study.

Authors:  Denis Walsh; Helen Spiby; Christine McCourt; Celia Grigg; Dawn Coleby; Simon Bishop; Miranda Scanlon; Lorraine Culley; Jane Wilkinson; Lynne Pacanowski; Jim Thornton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.