Literature DB >> 26336337

Examination of the Effectiveness of Predictors for Musculoskeletal Injuries in Female Soldiers.

Einat Kodesh1, Eyal Shargal2, Rotem Kislev-Cohen2, Shany Funk3, Lev Dorfman3, Gil Samuelly1, Jay R Hoffman4, Nurit Sharvit3.   

Abstract

The amount of training days lost to injury during military training has highlighted the need to identify a screening tool to predict injury. One hundred and fifty-eight female soldiers from the Combat Fitness Instructor Course (CFIC) of the Israel Defense Forces volunteered to participate in this study. All soldiers were free of orthopedic and neurologic conditions for at least one month before the study. All participants performed a battery of measurements during the first week of the course. Measures included anthropometric, functional movement screen (FMS), power performances (counter movement jump [CMJ], drop jump, single leg triple hop jump [SLTH], 10-m sprint) and a 2K run. Injury data was collected throughout the 3 month course. Median tests were used to compare between injured/non-injured soldiers. Chi-square and/or logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between various predictors and injury. Percent body fat [%BF] was higher (p = 0.04), distance for SLTH was less for both left and right legs (p = 0.029, p = 0.047 respectively) and 2K run was slower (p =0.044) in injured compared to non-injured soldiers. No differences between groups were noted in total FMS score, however more zero scores in one or more movement pattern were found in the injured group (51.35 % vs. 30.5% p=0.0293). Only %BF, 2K run and SLTH distance were significant predictors of injury (p = 0.05, p = 0.02, p =0.016 respectively). The results of this study indicated that the FMS total score is not a predictor of injury in female soldiers in a CFIC. We found that %BF, SLTH, 2K run time, 10 meter sprint time and zero scores differentiated between injured and non-injured soldiers. In addition, %BF, 2K run and SLTH were each found to be separate predictors of injury. Further research is needed to determine threshold scores that predict injury. Key pointsA total of 145 injuries were reported during the three month Combat Fitness Instructor Course in a female soldiers, 37 of these injuries resulted in absence from at least two days of training.FMS total score is not a predictor of injury in female soldiers in a CFIC. However, a score of zero, which is indicative of pain during movement, could serve as a warning sign for potential injury.%BF, SLTH, 10 meter sprint, 2K run and number of zero scores in FMS appear to differentiate between injured and non-injured soldiersSLTH, 2K run and body fat % are each separate predictors of injury for female soldiers in the CFIC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; combat fitness; functional movement screen; military

Year:  2015        PMID: 26336337      PMCID: PMC4541114     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  37 in total

1.  New method to identify athletes at high risk of ACL injury using clinic-based measurements and freeware computer analysis.

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1.

Authors:  Gray Cook; Lee Burton; Barb Hoogenboom
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-05

3.  Functional movement screen and aerobic fitness predict injuries in military training.

Authors:  Peter Lisman; Francis G O'Connor; Patricia A Deuster; Joseph J Knapik
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Risk factors for training-related injuries among men and women in basic combat training.

Authors:  J J Knapik; M A Sharp; M Canham-Chervak; K Hauret; J F Patton; B H Jones
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  The Swiss Army physical fitness test battery predicts risk of overuse injuries among recruits.

Authors:  T Wyss; R O Von Vigier; F Frey; U Mäder
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  A process to identify military injury prevention priorities based on injury type and limited duty days.

Authors:  Bruce A Ruscio; Bruce H Jones; Steven H Bullock; Bruce R Burnham; Michelle Canham-Chervak; Christopher P Rennix; Timothy S Wells; Jack W Smith
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Functional movement screen normative values in a young, active population.

Authors:  Anthony G Schneiders; Asa Davidsson; Elvira Hörman; S John Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-06

8.  Muscular strength, functional performances and injury risk in professional and junior elite soccer players.

Authors:  C Lehance; J Binet; T Bury; J L Croisier
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Triple-hop distance as a valid predictor of lower limb strength and power.

Authors:  R Tyler Hamilton; Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; David H Perrin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.

Authors:  Deydre S Teyhen; Scott W Shaffer; Chelsea L Lorenson; Joshua P Halfpap; Dustin F Donofry; Michael J Walker; Jessica L Dugan; John D Childs
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  15 in total

1.  Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport.

Authors:  Nicole J Chimera; Meghan Warren
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18

2.  Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters as Predictors of Lower-Limb Overuse Injuries in Military Training.

Authors:  Shmuel Springer; Uri Gottlieb; Mariya Lozin
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2016-07-13

3.  Developing predictive models for return to work using the Military Power, Performance and Prevention (MP3) musculoskeletal injury risk algorithm: a study protocol for an injury risk assessment programme.

Authors:  Daniel I Rhon; Deydre S Teyhen; Scott W Shaffer; Stephen L Goffar; Kyle Kiesel; Phil P Plisky
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Predictors of chronic prescription opioid use after orthopedic surgery: derivation of a clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  Daniel I Rhon; Suzanne J Snodgrass; Joshua A Cleland; Charles D Sissel; Chad E Cook
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-11-22

Review 5.  Utility of FMS to understand injury incidence in sports: current perspectives.

Authors:  Meghan Warren; Monica R Lininger; Nicole J Chimera; Craig A Smith
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2018-09-07

6.  The association between body fat and musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tom P Walsh; John B Arnold; Angela M Evans; Alison Yaxley; Raechel A Damarell; E Michael Shanahan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Effects of Combination Movement Patterns Quality and Physical Performance on Injuries in Young Athletes.

Authors:  Dawid Koźlenia; Jarosław Domaradzki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Study of the measurement and predictive validity of the Functional Movement Screen.

Authors:  Fraser Philp; Dimitra Blana; Edward K Chadwick; Caroline Stewart; Claire Stapleton; Kim Major; Anand D Pandyan
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-05-07

9.  Agreement between test procedures for the single-leg hop for distance and the single-leg mini squat as measures of lower extremity function.

Authors:  Eva Ageberg; Anna Cronström
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-08-22

Review 10.  Is a low Functional Movement Screen score (≤14/21) associated with injuries in sport? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Manuel Trinidad-Fernandez; Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2019-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.