Literature DB >> 26336178

Affinity for natal environments by dispersers impacts reproduction and explains geographical structure of a highly mobile bird.

Robert J Fletcher1, Ellen P Robertson2, Rebecca C Wilcox2, Brian E Reichert2, James D Austin2, Wiley M Kitchens2.   

Abstract

Understanding dispersal and habitat selection behaviours is central to many problems in ecology, evolution and conservation. One factor often hypothesized to influence habitat selection by dispersers is the natal environment experienced by juveniles. Nonetheless, evidence for the effect of natal environment on dispersing, wild vertebrates remains limited. Using 18 years of nesting and mark-resight data across an entire North American geographical range of an endangered bird, the snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis), we tested for natal effects on breeding-site selection by dispersers and its consequences for reproductive success and population structure. Dispersing snail kites were more likely to nest in wetlands of the same habitat type (lacustrine or palustrine) as their natal wetland, independent of dispersal distance, but this preference declined with age and if individuals were born during droughts. Importantly, dispersing kites that bred in natal-like habitats had lower nest success and productivity than kites that did not. These behaviours help explain recently described population connectivity and spatial structure across their geographical range and reveal that assortative breeding is occurring, where birds are more likely to breed with individuals born in the same wetland type as their natal habitat. Natal environments can thus have long-term and large-scale effects on populations in nature, even in highly mobile animals.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  connectivity; dispersal; evolutionary trap; natal habitat preference induction; snail kite; spatial network

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26336178      PMCID: PMC4571708          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences.

Authors:  Jeremy M Davis; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Natal location influences movement and survival of a spatially structured population of snail kites.

Authors:  Julien Martin; Wiley M Kitchens; James E Hines
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Dispersing brush mice prefer habitat like home.

Authors:  Karen E Mabry; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The type and timing of social information alters offspring production.

Authors:  Robert J Fletcher; Christine W Miller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  Patterns of variation in the influence of natal experience on habitat choice.

Authors:  Jeremy M Davis
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.875

6.  Can settlement in natal-like habitat explain maladaptive habitat selection?

Authors:  Walter H Piper; Michael W Palmer; Nathan Banfield; Michael W Meyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  How different types of natal experience affect habitat preference.

Authors:  Judy A Stamps; V V Krishnan; Neil H Willits
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates.

Authors:  W D Koenig; D Van Vuren; P N Hooge
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Reconstructing historical habitat data with predictive models.

Authors:  Christa L Zweig
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.657

10.  Natal habitat-biased dispersal in the Siberian flying squirrel.

Authors:  Vesa Selonen; Ilpo K Hanski; André Desrochers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  8 in total

1.  Isolating the roles of movement and reproduction on effective connectivity alters conservation priorities for an endangered bird.

Authors:  Ellen P Robertson; Robert J Fletcher; Christopher E Cattau; Bradley J Udell; Brian E Reichert; James D Austin; Denis Valle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Ecological traps: current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Robin Hale; Stephen E Swearer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  An invasive prey provides long-lasting silver spoon effects for an endangered predator.

Authors:  Caroline Poli; Ellen P Robertson; Julien Martin; Abby N Powell; Robert J Fletcher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Individual Movement Strategies Revealed through Novel Clustering of Emergent Movement Patterns.

Authors:  Denis Valle; Sreten Cvetojevic; Ellen P Robertson; Brian E Reichert; Hartwig H Hochmair; Robert J Fletcher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Testing the influence of habitat experienced during the natal phase on habitat selection later in life in Scandinavian wolves.

Authors:  Cyril Milleret; Andrés Ordiz; Ana Sanz-Pérez; Antonio Uzal; David Carricondo-Sanchez; Ane Eriksen; Håkan Sand; Petter Wabakken; Camilla Wikenros; Mikael Åkesson; Barbara Zimmermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Natal habitat imprinting counteracts the diversifying effects of phenotype-dependent dispersal in a spatially structured population.

Authors:  Carlos Camacho; David Canal; Jaime Potti
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Spatio-Temporal Variation in Age Structure and Abundance of the Endangered Snail Kite: Pooling across Regions Masks a Declining and Aging Population.

Authors:  Brian E Reichert; William L Kendall; Robert J Fletcher; Wiley M Kitchens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Experimental Test of Preferences for an Invasive Prey by an Endangered Predator: Implications for Conservation.

Authors:  Rebecca C Wilcox; Robert J Fletcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.