Literature DB >> 26335371

Relationship between epicardial fat and quantitative coronary artery plaque progression: insights from computer tomography coronary angiography.

Peter J Psaltis1,2, Andrew H Talman1, Kiran Munnur1, James D Cameron1, Brian S H Ko1, Ian T Meredith1, Sujith K Seneviratne1, Dennis T L Wong3,4.   

Abstract

Epicardial fat volume (EFV) has been suggested to promote atherosclerotic plaque development in coronary arteries, and has been correlated with both coronary stenosis and acute coronary events. Although associated with progression of coronary calcification burden, a relationship with progression of coronary atheroma volume has not been previously tested. We studied patients who had clinically indicated serial 320-row multi-detector computer tomography coronary angiography with a median 25-month interval. EFV was measured at baseline and follow-up. In vessels with coronary stenosis, quantitative analysis was performed to measure atherosclerotic plaque burden, volume and aggregate plaque volume at baseline and follow-up. The study comprised 64 patients (58.4 ± 12.2 years, 27 males, 192 vessels, 193 coronary segments). 79 (41 %) coronary segments had stenosis at baseline. Stenotic segments were associated with greater baseline EFV than those without coronary stenosis (117.4 ± 45.1 vs. 102.3 ± 51.6 cm(3), P = 0.046). 46 (24 %) coronary segments displayed either new plaque formation or progression of adjusted plaque burden at follow-up. These were associated with higher baseline EFV than segments without stenosis or those segments that had stenoses that did not progress (128.7 vs. 101.0 vs. 106.7 cm(3) respectively, P = 0.006). On multivariate analysis, baseline EFV was the only independent predictor of coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression or new development (P = 0.014). High baseline EFV is associated with the presence of coronary artery stenosis and plaque volume progression. Accumulation of EFV may be implicated in the evolution and progression of coronary atheroma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac CT; Computed tomography; Coronary artery plaque progression; Coronary artery stenosis; Epicardial fat

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26335371     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0762-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  45 in total

Review 1.  Imaging cardiac fat.

Authors:  Daniel Davidovich; Amalia Gastaldelli; Rosa Sicari
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Association of epicardial fat with cardiovascular risk factors and incident myocardial infarction in the general population: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study.

Authors:  Amir A Mahabadi; Marie H Berg; Nils Lehmann; Hagen Kälsch; Marcus Bauer; Kaffer Kara; Nico Dragano; Susanne Moebus; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Raimund Erbel; Stefan Möhlenkamp
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Effects of bariatric surgery on cardiac ectopic fat: lesser decrease in epicardial fat compared to visceral fat loss and no change in myocardial triglyceride content.

Authors:  Bénédicte Gaborit; Alexis Jacquier; Frank Kober; Ines Abdesselam; Thomas Cuisset; Sandrine Boullu-Ciocca; Olivier Emungania; Marie-Christine Alessi; Karine Clément; Monique Bernard; Anne Dutour
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Perivascular adipose tissue and coronary vascular disease.

Authors:  Meredith Kohr Owen; Jillian N Noblet; Daniel J Sassoon; Abass M Conteh; Adam G Goodwill; Johnathan D Tune
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 8.311

5.  Relationship between epicardial fat measured by 64-multidetector computed tomography and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kohichiro Iwasaki; Takeshi Matsumoto; Hitoshi Aono; Hiroshi Furukawa; Masanobu Samukawa
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Adipose tissue in the mammalian heart and pericardium: structure, foetal development and biochemical properties.

Authors:  J M Marchington; C A Mattacks; C M Pond
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B       Date:  1989

7.  Serial coronary CT angiography-verified changes in plaque characteristics as an end point: evaluation of effect of statin intervention.

Authors:  Kaori Inoue; Sadako Motoyama; Masayoshi Sarai; Takahisa Sato; Hiroto Harigaya; Tomonori Hara; Yoshihiro Sanda; Hirofumi Anno; Takeshi Kondo; Nathan D Wong; Jagat Narula; Yukio Ozaki
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-07

8.  Influence of a lipid-lowering therapy on calcified and noncalcified coronary plaques monitored by multislice detector computed tomography: results of the New Age II Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christof Burgstahler; Anja Reimann; Torsten Beck; Axel Kuettner; Dorothee Baumann; Martin Heuschmid; Harald Brodoefel; Claus D Claussen; Andreas F Kopp; Stephen Schroeder
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Volumetric measurement of pericardial adipose tissue from contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  John H Nichols; Bharat Samy; Khurram Nasir; Caroline S Fox; P Christian Schulze; Fabian Bamberg; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2008-08-19

10.  Assessment of changes in non-calcified atherosclerotic plaque volume in the left main and left anterior descending coronary arteries over time by 64-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael Schmid; Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Sei Komatsu; Ulrike Ropers; Werner G Daniel; Tobias Pflederer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  7 in total

1.  Ethnic differences in coronary plaque and epicardial fat volume quantified using computed tomography.

Authors:  Daniel B Adams; Om Narayan; Ravi Kiran Munnur; James D Cameron; Dennis T L Wong; Andrew H Talman; Richard W Harper; Sujith K Seneviratne; Ian T Meredith; Brian S Ko
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  The ratio of epicardial to body fat improves the prediction of coronary artery disease beyond calcium and Framingham risk scores.

Authors:  Bai-Chin Lee; Wen-Jeng Lee; Shyh-Chyi Lo; Hsiu-Ching Hsu; Kuo-Liong Chien; Yeun-Chung Chang; Ming-Fong Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Epicardial fat thickness: distribution and association with diabetes mellitus, hypertension and the metabolic syndrome in the ELSA-Brasil study.

Authors:  Daniela Bertol Graeff; Murilo Foppa; Julio Cesar Gall Pires; Alvaro Vigo; Maria Ines Schmidt; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Jose Geraldo Mill; Bruce Bartholow Duncan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Association of Epicardial Adipose Tissue and High-Risk Plaque Characteristics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nitesh Nerlekar; Adam J Brown; Rahul G Muthalaly; Andrew Talman; Thushan Hettige; James D Cameron; Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  64-Slice spiral double-low CT to evaluate the degree of stenosis and plaque composition in diagnosing coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Xiao-Rong Feng; Li-Hua Liang; Ju-Fang Wu; Yao-Qiang Chen; Shuang Liang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Analysis of Development Mechanism of Giant Cell Arteritis in Nude Mouse Model through Color Duplex Sonography and Computerized Tomography Nanocontrast Agent.

Authors:  Fugang Chen; Yang Li; Hongyan Zhou; Chuang Sun; Sun Li; Lu Wang; Xin Li; Xiaoqiang Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Inflammation in Coronary Atherosclerosis and Its Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Nicholas J Montarello; Mau T Nguyen; Dennis T L Wong; Stephen J Nicholls; Peter J Psaltis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.727

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.