Literature DB >> 26335129

Wide excision of soft tissues adjacent to the ovary and fallopian tube does not impair the ovarian reserve in women undergoing prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy: results from a randomized, controlled trial.

Roberta Venturella1, Michele Morelli2, Daniela Lico3, Annalisa Di Cello3, Morena Rocca3, Angela Sacchinelli3, Rita Mocciaro3, Pietro D'Alessandro3, Antonio Maiorana4, Salvatore Gizzo5, Fulvio Zullo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of the wide excision of soft tissues adjacent to the ovary and fallopian tube on ovarian function and surgical outcomes in women undergoing laparoscopic bilateral prophylactic salpingectomy.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): One hundred eighty-six women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for uterine myoma (n = 143) or tubal surgical sterilization (n = 43). INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomly divided into two groups. In group A (n = 91), standard salpingectomy was performed. In group B (n = 95), the mesosalpinx was removed within the tubes. Prior to and 3 months after surgery, antimüllerian hormone (AMH), FSH, three-dimensional antral follicle count (AFC), vascular index (VI), flow index (FI), vascular-flow index (VFI), and OvAge were recorded for each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ovarian reserve modification (Δ) before and after surgery was assessed as the primary outcome. Operative time, variation of the hemoglobin level (ΔHb), postoperative hospital stay, postoperative return to normal activity, and complication rate were assessed as secondary outcomes. RESULT(S): No significant difference was observed between groups for ΔAMH, ΔFSH, ΔAFC, ΔVI, ΔFI, ΔVFI, and ΔOvAge. Moreover, the groups were similar for operative time, ΔHb, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative return to normal activity, and complication rate. CONCLUSION(S): Even when the surgical excision includes the removal of the mesosalpinx, salpingectomy does not damage the ovarian reserve. Moreover, wide salpingectomy with excision of the mesosalpinx did not alter blood loss, hospitalization stay, or return to normal activities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02086370.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wide salpingectomy; ovarian cancer prevention; ovarian reserve; prophylactic surgery; surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26335129     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

Review 1.  Risk-reducing salpingectomy: Let us be opportunistic.

Authors:  Kara C Long Roche; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mlica Nourmoussavi; Oliver Zivanovic
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Involvement of mesosalpinx in endometrioma is a possible risk factor for decrease of ovarian reserve after cystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ai Saito; Akira Iwase; Tomoko Nakamura; Satoko Osuka; Tomohiko Murase; Nao Kato; Chiharu Ishida; Sachiko Takikawa; Maki Goto; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 3.  Salpingectomy before assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marco Noventa; Salvatore Gizzo; Carlo Saccardi; Shara Borgato; Amerigo Vitagliano; Michela Quaranta; Pietro Litta; Michele Gangemi; Guido Ambrosini; Donato D'Antona; Stefano Palomba
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.234

4.  Should national societies recommend opportunistic salpingectomy?

Authors:  Karl Tamussino
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 5.  Recommendations and Choices for BRCA Mutation Carriers at Risk for Ovarian Cancer: A Complicated Decision.

Authors:  Kelsey E Lewis; Karen H Lu; Amber M Klimczak; Samuel C Mok
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Trends of Opportunistic Salpingectomy.

Authors:  Dah-Ching Ding; Ci Huang; Tang-Yuan Chu; Yu-Chi Wei; Pao-Chu Chen; Mun-Kun Hong
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Bilateral salpingectomy versus bilateral partial salpingectomy during cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Jose R Duncan; Heather L Jones; Stefanie O Hoffer; Mauro H Schenone; Giancarlo Mari
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-23

8.  Comparison of the efficacy between bilateral proximal tubal occlusion and total salpingectomy on ovarian reserve and the cholinergic system: an experimental study

Authors:  Remzi Atilgan; Şehmus Pala; Tuncay Kuloğlu; Cengiz Şanli; Şeyda Yavuzkir; Zehra Sema Özkan
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 0.973

Review 9.  Bilateral salpingectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer in women at average risk: a position statement of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (KSOG).

Authors:  Miseon Kim; Young-Han Kim; Yong Beom Kim; Jayeon Kim; Jae-Weon Kim; Mi Hye Park; Joo Hyun Park; Jeong Ho Rhee; Myong Cheol Lim; Joon-Seok Hong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-09-07

10.  Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Benign Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Assessment of Possible Complications and Histopathological p53-Signatures.

Authors:  Gautier Chene; Sarah Urvoas; Stéphanie Moret; Béatrice Nadaud; Annie Buenerd; Philippe Chabert; Georges Mellier; Gery Lamblin
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.