Literature DB >> 26334873

Correction: Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: What Water Tells Us about Biological Tissues.

Denis Le Bihan, Mami Iima.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002203.].

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26334873      PMCID: PMC4559450          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   8.029


Some errors were introduced in the ordering of the references in the published paper. References 1–5 were listed out of order and therefore also caused errors within the in-text citations, as detailed below: 1. In the first paragraph of the section titled ‘Principles of Diffusion MRI and Key Concepts’, the third sentence should have cited reference 2, instead of 1. The correct sentence should read: Unexpectedly, diffusion (a visible phenomenon) was linked by Einstein to Brownian motion in the context of the theory of heat to prove the existence of (invisible) atoms and molecules [2]. 2. In the second paragraph, titled ‘Principles of Diffusion MRI and Key Concepts’, the third to last sentence should have cited reference 3, instead of 2. The correct sentence should read: Diffusion-driven displacements of water molecules are encoded in the MRI signal by spatial and temporal variation of the magnetic field (see [3] for a review of the history and the principles of diffusion MRI) generated by magnetic field gradient pulses. 3. In the second paragraph of the section titled ‘Principles of Diffusion MRI and Key Concepts’, the last sentence should have cited references 4 and 5 respectively, rather than 3 and 4. The correct sentence should read: The observation of non-Gaussian diffusion and the related modeling of diffusion effects was investigated by pioneers such as Stejskal and Tanner (see [4] for a review), well before the advent of MRI, but this issue remains a complex and hot topic of investigation today for diffusion MRI [5]. 4. In the third paragraph of the section titles ‘Principles of Diffusion MRI and Key Concepts’, the first sentence should have cited reference 1 rather than 5. The correct sentence should read: The “apparent diffusion coefficient” (ADC) concept was introduced along with the diffusion MRI concept [1] to avoid the difficulties of non-Gaussian diffusion and facilitate clinical application of the technique. 5. In the first paragraph of the section titled ‘Applications of Diffusion MRI; Acute Brain Ischemia’ the last sentence cited reference 3 rather than 4. The correct sentence should read: Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this sharp, counterintuitive decrease in water diffusion, but the exact mechanisms linking the ADC decrease with cell swelling still remain today to be clarified [4]. 6. In the section titled ‘Wiring of the Brain’, the third from last sentence cited reference 2 rather than 3. The correct sentence should read: The potential of diffusion MRI to probe human brain connectivity has attracted worldwide interest and is now widely used in clinical practice. Recent results from the European FP7 CONNECT project [42] and the Human Connectome Project [43] have clearly underlined the enormous potential of this approach, yielding insight into how brain connections underlie function and opening up new lines of inquiry for human neuroscience and brain dysfunction in aging, mental health disorders, addiction, and neurological disease [3]. The full corrected list of references is also provided here: Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology. 1986; 161 (2):401–7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909 PMID: 3763909 Einstein A. Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement: Courier Dover Publications; 1956. Le Bihan D, Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function. Neuroimage. 2012; 61(2):324–41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.006 PMID: 22120012 Le Bihan D. The 'wet mind': water and functional neuroimaging. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2007; 52(7):R57–90. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/r02 PMID: 17374909 Yablonskiy DA, Sukstanskii AL. Theoretical models of the diffusion weighted MR signal. NMR in biomedicine. 2010; 23(7):661–81. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1520 PMID: 20886562 Le Bihan D. Apparent diffusion coefficient and beyond: what diffusion MR imaging can tell us about tissue structure. Radiology. 2013; 268(2):318–22. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130420 PMID: 23882093 Pyatigorskaya N, Le Bihan D, Reynaud O, Ciobanu L. Relationship between the diffusion time and the diffusion MRI signal observed at 17.2 tesla in the healthy rat brain cortex. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2014; 72(2):492–500. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24921 PMID: 24022863 Grinberg F, Farrher E, Ciobanu L, Geffroy F, Le Bihan D, Shah NJ. Non-Gaussian Diffusion Imaging for Enhanced Contrast of Brain Tissue Affected by Ischemic Stroke. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(2):e89225. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089225 PMID: 24586610 Anderson SW, Barry B, Soto J, Ozonoff A, O'Brien M, Jara H. Characterizing non‐gaussian, high bvalue diffusion in liver fibrosis: Stretched exponential and diffusional kurtosis modeling. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 39(4):827–34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24234 PMID: 24259401 Yuan J, Yeung DKW, Mok GS, Bhatia KS, Wang Y-XJ, Ahuja AT, et al. Non-Gaussian Analysis of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Head and Neck at 3T: A Pilot Study in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(1):e87024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087024 PMID: 24466318 Iima M, Yano K, Kataoka M, Umehana M, Murata K, Kanao S, et al. Quantitative non-gaussian diffusion and intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. Invest Radiol. 2015; 50(4):205–11. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000094 PMID: 25260092 Iima M, Reynaud O, Tsurugizawa T, Ciobanu L, Li J-R, Geffroy F, et al. Characterization of Glioma Microcirculation and Tissue Features Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Rat Brain Model. Invest Radiol. 2014; 49(7):485–90. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000040 PMID: 24619211 Assaf Y, Basser PJ. Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage. 2005; 27(1):48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.042 PMID: 15979342 Assaf Y, Blumenfeld‐Katzir T, Yovel Y, Basser PJ. AxCaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2008; 59(6):1347–54. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21577 PMID: 18506799 Zhang H, Schneider T, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Alexander DC. NODDI: Practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage. 2012; 61(4):1000–16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072 PMID: 22484410 Moseley M, Cohen Y, Mintorovitch J, Chileuitt L, Shimizu H, Kucharczyk J, et al. Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion and T2‐weighted MRI and spectroscopy. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1990; 14(2):330–46. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910140218 PMID: 2345513 Turner R, Le Bihan D, Maier J, Vavrek R, Hedges LK, Pekar J. Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion. Radiology. 1990; 177(2):407–14. doi: 10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217777 PMID: 2217777 Warach S, Chien D, Li W, Ronthal M, Edelman RR. Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke. Neurology. 1992; 42(9):1717–23. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.9.1717 PMID: 1513459 Warach S, Boska M, Welch KM. Pitfalls and potential of clinical diffusion-weighted MR imaging in acute stroke. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 1997; 28(3):481–2. PMID: 9056599 Warach S, Dashe JF, Edelman RR. Clinical outcome in ischemic stroke predicted by early diffusion weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary analysis. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 1996; 16(1):53–9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910390605 PMID: 8530555 Dreher W, Kuhn B, Gyngell ML, Busch E, Niendorf T, Hossmann KA, et al. Temporal and regional changes during focal ischemia in rat brain studied by proton spectroscopic imaging and quantitative diffusion NMR imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1998; 39(6):878–88. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910390605 PMID: 9621911 Gonzalez RG, Schaefer PW, Buonanno FS, Schwamm LH, Budzik RF, Rordorf G, et al. Diffusion weighted MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy in patients imaged within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset. Radiology. 1999; 210(1):155–62. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja02155 PMID: 9885601 Lovblad KO, Baird AE, Schlaug G, Benfield A, Siewert B, Voetsch B, et al. Ischemic lesion volumes in acute stroke by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging correlate with clinical outcome. Annals of neurology. 1997; 42(2):164–70. doi: 10.1002/ana.410420206 PMID: 9266725 Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, Gao YG, An NY, Ma L, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 16 (2):172–8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10140 PMID: 12203765 Humphries PD, Sebire NJ, Siegel MJ, Olsen ØE. Tumors in Pediatric Patients at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Tumor Cellularity Radiology. 2007; 245(3):848–54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2452061535 PMID: 17951348 Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, Ikushima I, Shigematu Y, Hirai T, et al. Usefulness of diffusion weighted MRI with echo‐planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999; 9(1):53–60. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199901)9:1<53::aid-jmri7>3.0.co;2–2 PMID: 10030650 Fan G, Zang P, Jing F, Wu Z, Guo Q. Usefulness of Diffusion/Perfusion-weighted MRI in Rat Gliomas: Correlation with Histopathology. Academic Radiology. 2005; 12(5):640–51. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.01.024 PMID: 15866139 Nakajo M, Kajiya Y, Kaneko T, Kaneko Y, Takasaki T, Tani A, et al. FDG PET/CT and diffusion weighted imaging for breast cancer: prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake values and apparent diffusion coefficient values of the primary lesion. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2010; 37(11):2011–20. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1529-7 PMID: 20607535 Turkbey B, Shah VP, Pang Y, Bernardo M, Xu S, Kruecker J, et al. Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? Radiology.2011; 258(2):488–95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100667 PMID: 21177390 Cui Y, Zhang X-P, Sun Y-S, Tang L, Shen L. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Potential Imaging Biomarker for Prediction and Early Detection of Response to Chemotherapy in Hepatic Metastases Radiology. 2008; 248(3):894–900. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071407 PMID: 18710982 Koh D-M, Scurr E, Collins D, Kanber B, Norman A, Leach MO, et al. Predicting response of colorectal hepatic metastasis: value of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficients. American Journal of Roentgenology.2007; 188(4):1001–8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.06.0601 PMID: 17377036 Sun Y-S, Zhang X-P, Tang L, Ji J-F, Gu J, Cai Y, et al. Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma Treated with Preoperative Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy: Preliminary Analysis of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Early Detection of Tumor Histopathologic Downstaging Radiology. 2009; 254(1):170–8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2541082230 PMID: 20019139 Filli L, Wurnig M, Nanz D, Luechinger R, Kenkel D, Boss A. Whole-Body Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging: Initial Experience on Non-Gaussian Diffusion in Various Organs. Investigative Radiology. 2014; 49 (12):773–8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000082 PMID: 24979203 Patterson DM, Padhani AR, Collins DJ. Technology insight: water diffusion MRI—a potential new biomarker of response to cancer therapy. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. 2008; 5(4):220–33. doi: 10.1038/ncponc1073 PMID: 18301415 Padhani AR, Liu G, Mu-Koh D, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, Takahara T, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia. 2009;11(2):102–25. PMID: 19186405 Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Van Cauteren M. Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiation Medicine. 2004; 22(4):275–82. PMID: 15468951 Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophysical Journal.1994; 66(1):259–67. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80775-1 PMID: 8130344 Douek P, Turner R, Pekar J, Patronas N, Le Bihan D. MR color mapping of myelin fiber orientation. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 1991; 15(6):923–9. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199111000-00003 PMID: 1939769 Mori S, Crain BJ, Chacko VP, van Zijl PC. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of neurology. 1999; 45(2):265–9. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199902)45:2<265::aid-ana21>3.0.co;2–3 PMID: 9989633 Conturo TE, Lori NF, Cull TS, Akbudak E, Snyder AZ, Shimony JS, et al. Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(18):10422–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10422 PMID: 10468624 Poupon C, Clark CA, Frouin V, Regis J, Bloch I, Le Bihan D, et al. Regularization of diffusion-based direction maps for the tracking of brain white matter fascicles. Neuroimage. 2000; 12(2):184–95. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0607 PMID:10913324 Assaf Y, Alexander DC, Jones DK, Bizzi A, Behrens TE, Clark CA, et al. The CONNECT project: combining macro-and micro-structure. Neuroimage. 2013; 80:273–82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.055 PMID: 23727318 McNab JA, Edlow BL, Witzel T, Huang SY, Bhat H, Heberlein K, et al. The Human Connectome Project and beyond: Initial applications of 300mT/m gradients. Neuroimage. 2013; 80:234–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.074 PMID: 23711537 Shizukuishi T, Abe O, Aoki S. Diffusion tensor imaging analysis for psychiatric disorders. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences. 2013; 12(3):153–9. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0082 PMID: 23857149 Ogawa S, Lee T-M, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1990; 87(24):9868–72. 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9868 Le Bihan D, Urayama S-i, Aso T, Hanakawa T, Fukuyama H. Direct and fast detection of neuronal activation in the human brain with diffusion MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103(21):8263–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600644103 Aso T, Urayama S-i, Poupon C, Sawamoto N, Fukuyama H, Le Bihan D. An intrinsic diffusion response function for analyzing diffusion functional MRI time series. Neuroimage. 2009; 47(4):1487–95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.027 PMID: 19450693 Tsurugizawa T, Ciobanu L, Le Bihan D. Water diffusion in brain cortex closely tracks underlying neuronal activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013; 110(28):11636–41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303178110 Crick F. Do dendritic spines twitch? Trends in Neurosciences. 1982; 5:44–6. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(82)90020-0 Ramon Y, Cajal S. Textura del Sistema Nervioso del Hombre y de los Vertebrados: Madrid, Nicolas Moya; 1899–1904. Legon W, Sato TF, Opitz A, Mueller J, Barbour A, Williams A, et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nature Neuroscience. 2014; 17(2):322–9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3620 PMID: 24413698 Pauling L. A Molecular Theory of General Anesthesia is attributed to the formation in the brain of minute hydrate crystals of the clathrate type. Science. 1961; 134(3471):15–21. doi: 10.1126/science.134.3471.15 Jelescu IO, Nargeot R, Le Bihan D, Ciobanu L. Highlighting manganese dynamics in the nervous system of Aplysia californica using MEMRI at ultra-high field. Neuroimage. 2013; 76:264–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.022 PMID: 23523801 Zilles K, Amunts K. Centenary of Brodmann's map—conception and fate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2010;11(2):139–45. doi: 10.1038/nrn2776. PMID:20046193
  1 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: What Water Tells Us about Biological Tissues.

Authors:  Denis Le Bihan; Mami Iima
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 8.029

  1 in total
  6 in total

1.  Exploration of male urethral sphincter complex using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based fiber-tracking.

Authors:  Shantanu Sinha; Usha Sinha; Vadim Malis; Valmik Bhargava; Kyoko Sakamoto; Mahadevan Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Active learning strategy and hybrid training for infarct segmentation on diffusion MRI with a U-shaped network.

Authors:  Aurélien Olivier; Olivier Moal; Bertrand Moal; Fanny Munsch; Gosuke Okubo; Igor Sibon; Vincent Dousset; Thomas Tourdias
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-04

3.  Water apparent diffusion coefficient correlates with gamma oscillation of local field potentials in the rat brain nucleus accumbens following alcohol injection.

Authors:  Tomokazu Tsurugizawa; Yoshifumi Abe; Denis Le Bihan
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  The apparent diffusion coefficient is a useful biomarker in predicting treatment response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Mayra Evelia Jiménez de Los Santos; Juan Armando Reyes-Pérez; Rosa Martha Sandoval-Nava; José Luis Villalobos-Juárez; Yolanda Villaseñor-Navarro; Itzel Vela-Sarmiento; Isabel Sollozo-Dupont
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2020-09-15

5.  Correlation between diffusion tensor imaging measures and the reading and cognitive performance of Arabic readers: dyslexic children perspective.

Authors:  Safaa El-Sady; Shaimaa Abdelsattar Mohammad; Khaled Aboualfotouh Ahmed; Ahmed Nabil Khattab; Neveen Hassan Nashaat; Ghada Orabi; Ehab Ragaa Abdelraouf
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Permeability of the blood-brain barrier predicts no evidence of disease activity at 2 years after natalizumab or fingolimod treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Stig P Cramer; Helle J Simonsen; Aravinthan Varatharaj; Ian Galea; Jette L Frederiksen; Henrik B W Larsson
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 10.422

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.