| Literature DB >> 26334270 |
Tomohisa Nagano1, Nobuyoshi Seki2, Yoichi Tomita3, Tomonori Sugita4, Yuta Aida5, Munenori Itagaki6, Satoshi Sutoh7, Hiroshi Abe8, Akihito Tsubota9, Yoshio Aizawa5.
Abstract
Reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level is a characteristic feature of dyslipidemia in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, abnormality in serum triglyceride (TG) has not been fully investigated. To clarify the impact of HCV genotype 1b (G1b) infection and advanced fibrosis on serum TG profiles, TG concentrations in lipoprotein fractions were examined in fasting sera from 185 subjects with active or cleared HCV infection by high-performance liquid chromatography. Serum lipoproteins were fractionated into four classes: chylomicron, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), LDL, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Then, the significance of HCV G1b infection on TG levels in each lipoprotein fraction was determined using multiple regression models. We found that active HCV G1b infection was positively associated with high HDL-TG levels and low VLDL-TG levels, independent of other factors included in the regression model. In VLDL sub-fractions, active HCV infection was only found to be associated with low levels of large VLDL-TG. Similarly, advanced liver fibrosis in chronic HCV G1b infection was associated with high levels of LDL-TG, HDL-TG, and small VLDL-TG, independent of other clinical factors. These findings indicate that active HCV G1b infection and advanced fibrosis are closely associated with abnormal serum TG profiles.Entities:
Keywords: VLDL sub-fractions; chronic hepatitis C (CHC); hepatitis C virus (HCV); lipoprotein; triglyceride (TG); very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26334270 PMCID: PMC4613219 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160920576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Comparison of clinical features between patients with chronic active HCV G1b infection (active HCV) and cleared HCV infection (SVR).
| Discrete Traits | Active HCV ( | SVR ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.08 | ||||||||
| Male | 36 (35) | 40 (49) | |||||||
| Female | 67 (65) | 42 (51) | |||||||
| Age (years) | 71.0 | 63.0–78.0 | 64.0 | 56.0–72.8 | 0.001 | ||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.9 | 20.1–24.2 | 22.6 | 20.9–24.5 | 0.1 | ||||
| HbA1c (%) | 5.5 | 5.2–5.8 | 5.6 | 5.3–6.0 | 0.1 | ||||
| AST (IU/L) | 41.0 | 29.5–63.5 | 22.0 | 19.0–28.0 | <0.001 | ||||
| ALT (IU/L) | 33.0 | 23.0–53.5 | 16.0 | 13.0–22.8 | <0.001 | ||||
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.7 | 0.6–0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5–0.9 | 0.050 | ||||
| γ-GTP (IU/L) | 30.0 | 20.5–49.0 | 20.0 | 15.0–30.0 | <0.001 | ||||
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.1 | 3.8–4.3 | 4.4 | 4.2–4.6 | <0.001 | ||||
| Platelet (104/μL) | 15.0 | 11.2–20.4 | 18.0 | 14.8–21.8 | 0.002 | ||||
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 174.0 | 151.5–192.0 | 196.0 | 176.3–217.0 | <0.001 | ||||
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 88.0 | 67.0–112.0 | 89.5 | 70.3–135.0 | 0.4 | ||||
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 90.0 | 74.0–111.0 | 112.0 | 93.0–132.0 | <0.001 | ||||
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 61.2 | 48.0–72.4 | 63.0 | 53.3–77.9 | 0.2 | ||||
Figure 1Comparison of triglyceride (TG) concentrations in lipoprotein sub-fractions between active HCV and SVR groups. Serum lipoprotein was fractionated by HPLC into 20 fractions according to the particle size, and the concentration of TG in each fraction was measured using an online detection system (Skylight Biotech, Inc., Akita, Japan). The fraction number and the mean particle size are shown at the bottom of the image (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 2Comparison of TG concentrations in the four major classes of serum lipoproteins between active HCV and SVR groups. (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Significance of chronic active HCV infection on serum levels of lipoproteins analyzed by multiple regression models.
| VLDL-TG | LDL-TG | HDL-TG | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | ||||
| Constant | 2.4 | 44.4 | 1.0 | 9.2 | 16.2 | 0.6 | 22.7 | 8.6 | 0.01 |
| HCV infection (Active HCV | −13.8 | 6.9 | 0.047 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 0.52 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.02 |
| Age | −0.01 | 0.2 | 0.96 | 0.2 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.04 | 0.9 |
| Female gender | −12.7 | 5.8 | 0.03 | −0.3 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.02 |
| BMI | 0.99 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| ALT | −0.02 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.03 | −0.01 | 0.02 | 0.7 |
| γ-GTP | 0.2 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.09 |
| Albumin | 10.6 | 7.6 | 0.2 | −2.7 | 2.8 | 0.3 | −1.1 | 1.5 | 0.4 |
| HbA1c | 0.06 | 4.9 | 0.99 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.5 | −0.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Platelet | −0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | −0.08 | 0.09 | 0.4 | −0.01 | 0.05 | 0.8 |
Figure 3Comparison of the distribution of TG levels in the three VLDL sub-fractions for active HCV and SVR groups (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001).
Significance of active chronic HCV infection in the distribution of TG in the three VLDL sub-fractions analyzed by multiple regression models.
| Large VLDL-TG | Medium VLDL-TG | Small VLDL-TG | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | ||||
| Constant | −28.2 | 33.2 | 0.4 | 12.1 | 11.7 | 0.3 | 18.5 | 5.6 | 0.001 |
| HCV infection (Active HCV | −10.6 | 5.1 | 0.04 | −3.2 | 1.8 | 0.08 | −0.04 | 0.9 | 0.97 |
| Age | −0.06 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.003 | 0.06 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.1 |
| Female gender | −10.2 | 4.3 | 0.02 | −2.9 | 1.5 | 0.06 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| BMI | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| ALT | −0.04 | 0.07 | 0.6 | −0.002 | 0.03 | 0.93 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.1 |
| γ-GTP | 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.049 |
| Albumin | 14.3 | 5.7 | 0.01 | −0.3 | 2.00 | 0.9 | −3.4 | 0.9 | <0.001 |
| HbA1c | −0.4 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.5 | −0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Platelet | −0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | −0.09 | 0.06 | 0.2 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.5 |
Comparison of clinical features and the interferon lambda (IFNL) 3 genotype between HCV G1b patients with advanced fibrosis and those with mild-moderate fibrosis.
| Discrete Traits | Advanced Fibrosis ( | Mild-Moderate Fibrosis ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.07 | ||||
| Male | 13 (25) | 23 (44) | |||
| Female | 38 (75) | 29 (56) | |||
| IFNL3 genotype (rs8099917) | 0.06 | ||||
| TT | 40 (78) | 33 (63) | |||
| Non-TT | 9 (18) | 18 (35) | |||
| Not done | 2 (4) | 1 (2) | |||
| Age (years) | 75.0 | 68.5–80.5 | 66.0 | 52.8–73.0 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.1 | 20.1–24.1 | 21.5 | 20.3–24.4 | 0.97 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.5 | 5.0–5.8 | 5.5 | 5.3–5.8 | 0.4 |
| HCV-RNA (log IU/mL) | 6.5 | 6.0–6.8 | 6.7 | 5.8–7.1 | 0.2 |
| AST (IU/L) | 58.0 | 38.5–82.0 | 30.5 | 25.0–42.0 | <0.001 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 44.0 | 27.0–62.5 | 30.0 | 19.8–47.3 | 0.01 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.7 | 0.6–0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6–0.8 | 0.7 |
| γ-GTP (IU/L) | 33.0 | 22.0–48.5 | 30.0 | 18.0–49.5 | 0.5 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.0 | 3.6–4.3 | 4.2 | 4.0–4.3 | 0.01 |
| Platelet (104/μL) | 11.3 | 8.5–14.3 | 19.6 | 15.6–23.0 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 168.0 | 142.0–187.5 | 176.5 | 160.8–193.3 | 0.04 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 89.0 | 68.5–113.5 | 86.5 | 63.0–105.3 | 0.6 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 84.0 | 69.0–99.5 | 96.0 | 79.8–112.5 | 0.04 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 58.4 | 46.9–68.0 | 63.1 | 50.3–73.2 | 0.2 |
Figure 4Comparison of TG concentrations in lipoprotein sub-fractions between patients with advanced fibrosis and those with mild-moderate fibrosis. Serum lipoprotein was fractionated by HPLC into 20 fractions according to the particle size, and the concentration of TG in each fraction was measured using an online detection system (Skylight Biotech, Inc., Akita, Japan). The fraction number and the mean particle size of each fraction are presented at the bottom of the image (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Figure 5Comparison of the distribution of TG in the four major classes of serum lipoproteins between patients with advanced fibrosis and those with mild-moderate fibrosis (Adv, advanced; Mod, Moderate; * p < 0.05).
Significance of advanced liver fibrosis in the concentrations of VLDL-TG, LDL-TG, and HDL-TG, as analyzed using multiple regression models.
| VLDL-TG | LDL-TG | HDL-TG | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | ||||
| Constant | 10.8 | 42.6 | 0.8 | −23.9 | 21.4 | 0.3 | 15.4 | 10.8 | 0.2 |
| Advanced fibrosis | −2.8 | 6.5 | 0.7 | 10.4 | 3.3 | 0.002 | 4.2 | 1.7 | 0.01 |
| IFNL3 (Non-TT) | 2.9 | 7.2 | 0.7 | −2.1 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 0.02 |
| Female gender | −13.1 | 6.7 | 0.055 | −4.0 | 3.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0.9 |
| HCV-RNA | 7.7 | 3.8 | 0.04 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 0.01 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| BMI | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| HbA1c | −2.8 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 0.25 | −1.1 | 1.3 | 0.4 |
Figure 6Comparison of the distribution of TG in VLDL sub-fractions between patients with advanced fibrosis and those with mild-moderate fibrosis (Adv; advanced, Mod; moderate, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Impact of advanced fibrosis on the distribution of TG in VLDL sub-fractions analyzed using multiple regression models.
| Large VLDL-TG | Medium VLDL-TG | Small VLDL-TG | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | ||||
| Constant | 7.3 | 27.9 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 14.2 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 8.0 | 0.7 |
| Advanced fibrosis | −6.1 | 4.3 | 0.16 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 0.98 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.01 |
| IFNL3 (Non-TT) | 6.0 | 4.7 | 0.2 | −1.3 | 2.4 | 0.6 | −1.7 | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Female gender | −9.2 | 4.4 | 0.04 | −3.6 | 2.2 | 0.1 | −0.3 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| HCV-RNA | 4.3 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| BMI | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.08 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.04 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| HbA1c | −2.4 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0.91 | −0.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 |