Literature DB >> 26333811

Quantifying noise in mass spectrometry and yeast two-hybrid protein interaction detection experiments.

A Annibale1, A C C Coolen2, N Planell-Morell3.   

Abstract

Protein interaction networks (PINs) are popular means to visualize the proteome. However, PIN datasets are known to be noisy, incomplete and biased by the experimental protocols used to detect protein interactions. This paper aims at understanding the connection between true protein interactions and the protein interaction datasets that have been obtained using the most popular experimental techniques, i.e. mass spectronomy and yeast two-hybrid. We start from the observation that the adjacency matrix of a PIN, i.e. the binary matrix which defines, for every pair of proteins in the network, whether or not there is a link, has a special form, that we call separable. This induces precise relationships between the moments of the degree distribution (i.e. the average number of links that a protein in the network has, its variance, etc.) and the number of short loops (i.e. triangles, squares, etc.) along the links of the network. These relationships provide powerful tools to test the reliability of datasets and hint at the underlying biological mechanism with which proteins and complexes recruit each other.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  detection bias/sampling; network ensemble; network inference; protein interaction networks

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26333811      PMCID: PMC4614467          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  38 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Evolvability of yeast protein-protein interaction interfaces.

Authors:  David Talavera; Simon G Williams; Matthew G S Norris; David L Robertson; Simon C Lovell
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Subnets of scale-free networks are not scale-free: sampling properties of networks.

Authors:  Michael P H Stumpf; Carsten Wiuf; Robert M May
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes.

Authors:  Anne-Claude Gavin; Markus Bösche; Roland Krause; Paola Grandi; Martina Marzioch; Andreas Bauer; Jörg Schultz; Jens M Rick; Anne-Marie Michon; Cristina-Maria Cruciat; Marita Remor; Christian Höfert; Malgorzata Schelder; Miro Brajenovic; Heinz Ruffner; Alejandro Merino; Karin Klein; Manuela Hudak; David Dickson; Tatjana Rudi; Volker Gnau; Angela Bauch; Sonja Bastuck; Bettina Huhse; Christina Leutwein; Marie-Anne Heurtier; Richard R Copley; Angela Edelmann; Erich Querfurth; Vladimir Rybin; Gerard Drewes; Manfred Raida; Tewis Bouwmeester; Peer Bork; Bertrand Seraphin; Bernhard Kuster; Gitte Neubauer; Giulio Superti-Furga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Extensive parallel processing on scale-free networks.

Authors:  Peter Sollich; Daniele Tantari; Alessia Annibale; Adriano Barra
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome.

Authors:  T Ito; T Chiba; R Ozawa; M Yoshida; M Hattori; Y Sakaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Protein networks reveal detection bias and species consistency when analysed by information-theoretic methods.

Authors:  Luis P Fernandes; Alessia Annibale; Jens Kleinjung; Anthony C C Coolen; Franca Fraternali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Empirically controlled mapping of the Caenorhabditis elegans protein-protein interactome network.

Authors:  Nicolas Simonis; Jean-François Rual; Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis; Murat Tasan; Irma Lemmens; Tomoko Hirozane-Kishikawa; Tong Hao; Julie M Sahalie; Kavitha Venkatesan; Fana Gebreab; Sebiha Cevik; Niels Klitgord; Changyu Fan; Pascal Braun; Ning Li; Nono Ayivi-Guedehoussou; Elizabeth Dann; Nicolas Bertin; David Szeto; Amélie Dricot; Muhammed A Yildirim; Chenwei Lin; Anne-Sophie de Smet; Huey-Ling Kao; Christophe Simon; Alex Smolyar; Jin Sook Ahn; Muneesh Tewari; Mike Boxem; Stuart Milstein; Haiyuan Yu; Matija Dreze; Jean Vandenhaute; Kristin C Gunsalus; Michael E Cusick; David E Hill; Jan Tavernier; Frederick P Roth; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Nevan J Krogan; Gerard Cagney; Haiyuan Yu; Gouqing Zhong; Xinghua Guo; Alexandr Ignatchenko; Joyce Li; Shuye Pu; Nira Datta; Aaron P Tikuisis; Thanuja Punna; José M Peregrín-Alvarez; Michael Shales; Xin Zhang; Michael Davey; Mark D Robinson; Alberto Paccanaro; James E Bray; Anthony Sheung; Bryan Beattie; Dawn P Richards; Veronica Canadien; Atanas Lalev; Frank Mena; Peter Wong; Andrei Starostine; Myra M Canete; James Vlasblom; Samuel Wu; Chris Orsi; Sean R Collins; Shamanta Chandran; Robin Haw; Jennifer J Rilstone; Kiran Gandi; Natalie J Thompson; Gabe Musso; Peter St Onge; Shaun Ghanny; Mandy H Y Lam; Gareth Butland; Amin M Altaf-Ul; Shigehiko Kanaya; Ali Shilatifard; Erin O'Shea; Jonathan S Weissman; C James Ingles; Timothy R Hughes; John Parkinson; Mark Gerstein; Shoshana J Wodak; Andrew Emili; Jack F Greenblatt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Probing the extent of randomness in protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Joseph Ivanic; Anders Wallqvist; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.