BACKGROUND: If blood pressure (BP) falls during haemodialysis (HD) [intradialytic hypotension (IDH)] a common clinical practice is to reduce the extracorporeal blood flow rate (EBFR). Consequently the efficacy of the HD (Kt/V) is reduced. However, only very limited knowledge on the effect of reducing EBFR on BP exists and data are conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect and the potential mechanism(s) involved by investigating the impact of changes in EBFR on BP, pulse rate (PR) and cardiac output (CO) in HD patients with arteriovenous-fistulas (AV-fistulas). METHODS: We performed a randomized, crossover trial in 22 haemodynamically stable HD patients with AV-fistula. After a conventional HD session each patient was examined during EBFR of 200, 300 and 400 mL/min in random order. After 15 min when steady state was achieved CO, BP and PR were measured at each EFBR, respectively. RESULTS:Mean (SD) age was 71 (11) years. Systolic BP was significantly higher at an EBFR of 200 mL/min as compared with 300 mL/min [133 (23) versus 128 (24) mmHg; P < 0.05], but not as compared with 400 mL/min [133 (23) versus 130 (19) mmHg; P = 0.20]. At EBFR of 200, 300 and 400 mL/min diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure, PR and CO remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Our study does not show any consistent trend in BP changes by a reduction in EBFR. Reduction in EBFR if BP falls during IDH is thus not supported. However, none of the patients experienced IDH. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of changes in EBFR on BP during IDH.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: If blood pressure (BP) falls during haemodialysis (HD) [intradialytic hypotension (IDH)] a common clinical practice is to reduce the extracorporeal blood flow rate (EBFR). Consequently the efficacy of the HD (Kt/V) is reduced. However, only very limited knowledge on the effect of reducing EBFR on BP exists and data are conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect and the potential mechanism(s) involved by investigating the impact of changes in EBFR on BP, pulse rate (PR) and cardiac output (CO) in HDpatients with arteriovenous-fistulas (AV-fistulas). METHODS: We performed a randomized, crossover trial in 22 haemodynamically stable HDpatients with AV-fistula. After a conventional HD session each patient was examined during EBFR of 200, 300 and 400 mL/min in random order. After 15 min when steady state was achieved CO, BP and PR were measured at each EFBR, respectively. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age was 71 (11) years. Systolic BP was significantly higher at an EBFR of 200 mL/min as compared with 300 mL/min [133 (23) versus 128 (24) mmHg; P < 0.05], but not as compared with 400 mL/min [133 (23) versus 130 (19) mmHg; P = 0.20]. At EBFR of 200, 300 and 400 mL/min diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure, PR and CO remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Our study does not show any consistent trend in BP changes by a reduction in EBFR. Reduction in EBFR if BP falls during IDH is thus not supported. However, none of the patients experienced IDH. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of changes in EBFR on BP during IDH.
Authors: W J Bos; S Bruin; R W van Olden; I Keur; K H Wesseling; N Westerhof; R T Krediet; L A Arisz Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: K Yokokawa; R Mankus; M G Saklayen; M Kohno; K Yasunari; M Minami; H Kano; T Horio; T Takeda; A K Mandel Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1995-07-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Adrianna Douvris; Khalid Zeid; Swapnil Hiremath; Sean M Bagshaw; Ron Wald; William Beaubien-Souligny; Jennifer Kong; Claudio Ronco; Edward G Clark Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Matthew J Kaptein; John S Kaptein; Christopher D Nguyen; Zayar Oo; Phyu Phyu Thwe; Myint Bo Thu; Elaine M Kaptein Journal: Ren Fail Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 2.606