| Literature DB >> 26333156 |
Daniel R Clark1, Jeanne M Donaldson2, SungWoo Kahng3.
Abstract
This study extended the findings of Snyder, Higbee, and Dayton (2012) by presenting items via video during a paired-stimulus preference assessment but without providing access contingent on selection. Subsequently, items identified as highly, moderately, and less preferred were assessed in a concurrent reinforcer assessment, which suggested that these items did indeed function as reinforcers. © Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.Keywords: intellectual disabilities; stimulus preference assessment; technology; video
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26333156 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Behav Anal ISSN: 0021-8855