Tarik Benmarhnia1, Séverine Deguen, Jay S Kaufman, Audrey Smargiassi. 1. From the aUniversité de Montréal, Département de Santé Environnementale et Santé au Travail, Montréal, QC, Canada; bEcole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique (EHESP) School of Public Health, Rennes, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; cINSERM U1085 (IRSET), Rennes, France; dDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; and eInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Addressing vulnerability to heat-related mortality is a necessary step in the development of policies dictated by heat action plans. We aimed to provide a systematic assessment of the epidemiologic evidence regarding vulnerability to heat-related mortality. METHODS: Studies assessing the association between high ambient temperature or heat waves and mortality among different subgroups and published between January 1980 and August 2014 were selected. Estimates of association for all the included subgroups were extracted. We assessed the presence of heterogeneous effects between subgroups conducting Cochran Q tests. We conducted random effect meta-analyses of ratios of relative risks (RRR) for high ambient temperature studies. We performed random effects meta-regression analyses to investigate factors associated with the magnitude of the RRR. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies were included. Using the Cochran Q test, we consistently found evidence of vulnerability for the elderly ages >85 years. We found a pooled RRR of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97, 1.01) for male sex, 1.02 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.03) for age >65 years, 1.04 (95% CI = 1.02, 1.07) for ages >75 years, 1.03 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.05) for low individual socioeconomic status (SES), and 1.01 (95% CI = 0.99, 1.02) for low ecologic SES. CONCLUSIONS: We found strongest evidence of heat-related vulnerability for the elderly ages >65 and >75 years and low SES groups (at the individual level). Studies are needed to clarify if other subgroups (e.g., children, people living alone) are also vulnerable to heat to inform public health programs.
BACKGROUND: Addressing vulnerability to heat-related mortality is a necessary step in the development of policies dictated by heat action plans. We aimed to provide a systematic assessment of the epidemiologic evidence regarding vulnerability to heat-related mortality. METHODS: Studies assessing the association between high ambient temperature or heat waves and mortality among different subgroups and published between January 1980 and August 2014 were selected. Estimates of association for all the included subgroups were extracted. We assessed the presence of heterogeneous effects between subgroups conducting Cochran Q tests. We conducted random effect meta-analyses of ratios of relative risks (RRR) for high ambient temperature studies. We performed random effects meta-regression analyses to investigate factors associated with the magnitude of the RRR. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies were included. Using the Cochran Q test, we consistently found evidence of vulnerability for the elderly ages >85 years. We found a pooled RRR of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97, 1.01) for male sex, 1.02 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.03) for age >65 years, 1.04 (95% CI = 1.02, 1.07) for ages >75 years, 1.03 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.05) for low individual socioeconomic status (SES), and 1.01 (95% CI = 0.99, 1.02) for low ecologic SES. CONCLUSIONS: We found strongest evidence of heat-related vulnerability for the elderly ages >65 and >75 years and low SES groups (at the individual level). Studies are needed to clarify if other subgroups (e.g., children, people living alone) are also vulnerable to heat to inform public health programs.
Authors: Cassandra R O'Lenick; Andrea Winquist; Howard H Chang; Michael R Kramer; James A Mulholland; Andrew Grundstein; Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Lei Huang; Qianqi Yang; Jie Li; Jin Chen; Ruoying He; Can Zhang; Kai Chen; Steven Guanpeng Dong; Yang Liu Journal: Int J Biometeorol Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 3.787
Authors: Rupa Basu; Xiangmei May Wu; Brian J Malig; Rachel Broadwin; Ellen B Gold; Lihong Qi; Carol Derby; Elizabeth A Jackson; Rochelle S Green Journal: Environ Res Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Kai Chen; Radley M Horton; Daniel A Bader; Corey Lesk; Leiwen Jiang; Bryan Jones; Lian Zhou; Xiaodong Chen; Jun Bi; Patrick L Kinney Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Leah H Schinasi; Joan Rosen Bloch; Steven Melly; Yuzhe Zhao; Kari Moore; Anneclaire J De Roos Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 9.308