| Literature DB >> 26332041 |
Hideo Fukuhara1, Mitsuhiro Kureishi2, Takeo Khoda3, Katsushi Inoue3, Tohru Tanaka3, Kohei Iketani2, Masahiro Orita2, Keiji Inoue1, Taro Shuin1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value of a new photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) system using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) for the diagnosis of bladder tumors. To validate whether false-positive findings caused by tangent effects in PDD can be resolved, we compared diagnostic accuracies between the new PDD system and a conventional PDD system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 30 transurethral bladder biopsies, 15 cases received ALA-PDD using rigid fluorescence cystoscopy (conventional PDD system), and flexible fluorescence cystoscopy with a twin mode monitor (new PDD system) was used in a separate set of 15 cases. To evaluated the usefulness of ALA-PDD, diagnostic accuracies were retrospectively compared between the conventional PDD system and the new PDD system.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26332041 PMCID: PMC4558053 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136416
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patient characteristics.
| Variable | Conventional PDD system | New PDD system | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | 15 | 15 | |
| Examination period | Jan’09–Dec ‘09 | Dec’11-July’12 | |
| Age (yr) | Mean | 68.9 | 68.4 |
| Range | 49–81 | 50–87 | |
| Sex | Male | 13 | 10 |
| Female | 2 | 5 | |
| Past history | Primary case | 10 | 8 |
| Recurrent case | 5 | 7 | |
| Prior therapy | TUR-Bt | 4 | 2 |
| TUR-Bt + BCG | 1 | 5 | |
| Tumor stage | No malignancy | 2 | 6 |
| pT is | 2 | 1 | |
| a | 8 | 4 | |
| 1 | 3 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | 1 |
a Fisher exact test(2x2)
b Chi-square test
Pathological features and fluorescence intensity.
| Conventional PDD system in all regions | Fluorescence intensity | Total (# samples) | ||
| none | weak | strong | ||
| Normal epithelium | 49 | 23 | 2 | 74 |
| Dysplasia | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| UC G2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| UC G3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| UC G3-pTis | 4 | 5 | 6 | 15 |
| Total (# samples) | 55 | 38 | 17 | 110 (p<0.05 |
| New PDD system in all regions | Fluorescence intensity | Total (# samples) | ||
| none | weak | strong | ||
| Normal epithelium | 71 | 15 | 0 | 86 |
| Dysplasia | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| UC G2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| UC G3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| UC G3-pTis | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total (# samples) | 71 | 24 | 2 | 97 (p<0.05 |
| Conventional PDD system in distal regions | Fluorescence intensity | Total (# samples) | ||
| none | weak | strong | ||
| Normal epithelium | 12 | 11 | 0 | 23 |
| Dysplasia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| UC G2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| UC G3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| UC G3-pTis | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Total (# samples) | 13 | 15 | 2 | 30 |
| New PDD system in distal regions | Fluorescence intensity | Total (# samples) | ||
| none | weak | strong | ||
| Normal epithelium | 16 | 9 | 0 | 25 |
| Dysplasia | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| UC G2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| UC G3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| UC G3-pTis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total (# samples) | 16 | 14 | 0 | 30 |
(#1 Chi-square test)
Diagnostic accuracy.
| Diagnostic accuracy | Conventional PDD system White light mode (n = 15) | Conventional PDD system Blue light mode(n = 15) | New PDD system White light mode (n = 15) | New PDD system Blue light mode (n = 15) | Conventional PDD system in distal White light mode (n = 15) | Conventional PDD system in distal Blue light mode (n = 15) | New PDD system in distal White light mode (n = 15) | New PDD system in distal Blue light mode (n = 15) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive rate (%) | 23.6 | 50.0 | 8.2 | 26.8 | 10.0 | 56.7 | 10.0 | 46.7 |
| Predictive accuracy (%) | 80.8 | 54.5 | 87.5 | 42.3 | 33.3 | 35.3 | 66.7 | 35.7 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 58.3 | 83.3 | 58.3 | 100 | 14.3 | 85.7 | 60.0 | 100 |
| Specificity (%) | 93.2 | 66.2 | 98.8 | 82.6 | 91.3 | 52.2 | 96.0 | 64.0 |
These results demonstrated that the improvement of diagnostic accuracy in the distal bladder indicated better overall diagnostic accuracy in the new PDD system.
Adverse Events.
| Adverse events (Total 30 cases) | Incidence cases (%) | Grade of AEs |
|---|---|---|
| Photosensitivity | 1 (3.3%) | painless erythema |
| AST / ALT | 3 (10.0%) | >1XULN—2.5XULN |
| Nausea / Vomiting | 3 (10.0%) | loss of appetite without alteration |
| Others | 0(0.0%) | in eating habits / 1 episode in 24 hrs |
| Total cases (%) | 7 (23.3%) |
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 3.0 (CTCAE)
AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, ULN: upper limit of normal