Literature DB >> 26331459

Experimental study of the potential hazards of surgical smoke from powered instruments.

S M In1, D-Y Park2, I K Sohn3, C-H Kim3, H L Lim3, S-A Hong3, D Y Jung1, S-Y Jeong4, J H Han5, H J Kim3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many surgical instruments have been replaced with powered devices in open gastrointestinal and laparoscopic surgery. The production of smoke as a result of vaporization of surgical tissue is inevitable, and exposure to surgical smoke is a long-standing concern. These vapours are potentially hazardous to patients and surgical teams. The present research was designed to compare various surgical devices to determine whether viable cells exist in their surgical smoke.
METHODS: The search for viable cells in surgical smoke was conducted using both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Various cancers were cauterized with electrocautery, radiofrequency ablation and ultrasonic scalpels, and the resulting surgical smoke was aspirated with Transwell(®) membrane; viable cells were sought in the surgical smoke. In an in vivo experiment, samples of SCC7 were cauterized with an ultrasonic scalpel and the sediment from the rinsed Transwell(®) membrane liquid after centrifugation was injected subcutaneously into the lower back of mice.
RESULTS: Viable cells were found only in the smoke from ultrasonic scalpels (in all 25 samples taken 5 cm from the cautery; 2 of 25 samples at 10 cm). Viable cells in the surgical smoke from ultrasonic scalpels implanted in mice grew in 16 of 40 injection sites. Histological and biochemical analyses revealed that these cancer cells were identical to the cancer cells cauterized by the ultrasonic scalpel.
CONCLUSION: Viable tumour cells are produced in the surgical smoke from tumour dissection by ultrasonic scalpel. Surgical relevance Surgical smoke is a byproduct of dissection using a number of powered devices. Hazards to operating room personnel and patients are unclear. This study has shown that use of an ultrasonic dissection device can produce smoke that contains viable tumour cells. Although the model is somewhat artificial, a theoretical risk exists, and measures to evacuate surgical smoke efficiently are important.
© 2015 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26331459     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  18 in total

1.  Minimizing the Risk of Aerosol Contamination During Elective Lung Resection Surgery.

Authors:  George Rakovich; Robert Urbanowicz; Rami Issa; Han Ting Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Surgical Team Exposure to Cautery Smoke and Its Mitigation during Tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Daniel C O'Brien; Eun Gyung Lee; Jhy-Charm Soo; Sherri Friend; Sarah Callaham; Michele M Carr
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Electrosurgical Smoke: Ultrafine Particle Measurements and Work Environment Quality in Different Operating Theatres.

Authors:  Francesco Romano; Jan Gustén; Stefano De Antonellis; Cesare M Joppolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Endocrine Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations from the Turkish Association of Endocrine Surgery.

Authors:  Nurcihan Aygun; Yalin Iscan; Murat Ozdemir; Selen Soylu; Oguz Ugur Aydin; Ismail Cem Sormaz; Ahmet Cem Dural; Nuri Alper Sahbaz; Serkan Teksoz; Ozer Makay; Ali Ugur Emre; Mehmet Haciyanli; Recep Gokhan Icoz; Yasemin Giles; Adnan Isgor; Mehmet Uludag; Fatih Tunca
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2020-06-16

Review 5.  Is the ultrasonic scalpel recommended in head and neck surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic? State-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Miguel Mayo-Yánez; Christian Calvo-Henríquez; Jérôme R Lechien; Nicolas Fakhry; Tareck Ayad; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Comparison of Surgical Smoke Generated During Electrosurgery with Aerosolized Particulates from Ultrasonic and High-Speed Cutting.

Authors:  Vincent J Casey; Cian Martin; Peter Curtin; Kevin Buckley; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Organization of thoracic surgical services during the COVID pandemic.

Authors:  Lowell Leow; Kollengode Ramanathan; Theo Kofidis; John Kit Chung Tam; Harish Mithiran
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.392

8.  Effect of electrosurgery in the operating room on surgeons' blood indices: a simulation model and experiment on rabbits.

Authors:  Yu Hui; Jin Yan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 9.  The COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.

Authors:  Manabu Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  SAGES and EAES recommendations for minimally invasive surgery during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Nader Francis; Jonathan Dort; Eugene Cho; Liane Feldman; Deborah Keller; Rob Lim; Dean Mikami; Edward Phillips; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Shawn Tsuda; Kevin Wasco; Tan Arulampalam; Markar Sheraz; Salvador Morales; Andrea Pietrabissa; Horacio Asbun; Aurora Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.