Shara E Bailey1,2, Stefano Benazzi2,3, Laura Buti3, J-J Hublin2. 1. Department of Anthropology, Center for the Study of Human Origins, New York University, New York, NY, 10003. 2. Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, D-04103, Germany. 3. Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna, 48121, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the effect of allometry on the shape of lower dm2 (dm2) and lower M1 (M1) crown outlines and examines whether the trajectory and magnitude of allometric scaling are shared between Neandertals and Homo sapiens. METHODS: Our sample included 164 specimens: 57 recent H. sapiens, 44 Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens, 17 early H. sapiens, and 46 Neandertals. Of these, 59 represent dm2/M1 pairs from the same individuals. Occlusal photographs were used to obtain crown shapes of dm2s and M1s. Principal components analysis (PCA) of the matrix of shape coordinates was used to explore the pattern of morphological variation across the dm2 and M1 samples. Allometry was investigated by means of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. Two-block partial least squares (2B-PLS) analysis was used to explore patterns of covariation between dm2 and M1 crown outlines of matched individual pairs. RESULTS: The PCA confirmed significant differences between Neandertal and H. sapiens dm2 and M1 shapes. Allometry accounted for a small but statistically significant proportion of the total morphological variance. The magnitude of the allometric contribution to crown shape was stronger among Neandertals than among H. sapiens. However, we could not reject the null hypothesis that the two species share the same allometric trajectory. The 2B-PLS analysis of the pooled sample of paired individuals revealed a significant correlation in crown shape between dm2 and M1. While Procrustes distances differed significantly between dm2 and M1 in Neandertals, it did not among H. sapiens groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm several of the results obtained by a similar study of upper dm2/M1 (dm(2)/M(1)), but there are differences as well. Neandertal dm2/M1 shapes are less derived than those of the dm(2)/M(1). Such differences may support previous studies, which have suggested that different developmental and/or epigenetic factors affect the upper and lower dentitions.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the effect of allometry on the shape of lower dm2 (dm2) and lower M1 (M1) crown outlines and examines whether the trajectory and magnitude of allometric scaling are shared between Neandertals and Homo sapiens. METHODS: Our sample included 164 specimens: 57 recent H. sapiens, 44 Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens, 17 early H. sapiens, and 46 Neandertals. Of these, 59 represent dm2/M1 pairs from the same individuals. Occlusal photographs were used to obtain crown shapes of dm2s and M1s. Principal components analysis (PCA) of the matrix of shape coordinates was used to explore the pattern of morphological variation across the dm2 and M1 samples. Allometry was investigated by means of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. Two-block partial least squares (2B-PLS) analysis was used to explore patterns of covariation between dm2 and M1 crown outlines of matched individual pairs. RESULTS: The PCA confirmed significant differences between Neandertal and H. sapiensdm2 and M1 shapes. Allometry accounted for a small but statistically significant proportion of the total morphological variance. The magnitude of the allometric contribution to crown shape was stronger among Neandertals than among H. sapiens. However, we could not reject the null hypothesis that the two species share the same allometric trajectory. The 2B-PLS analysis of the pooled sample of paired individuals revealed a significant correlation in crown shape between dm2 and M1. While Procrustes distances differed significantly between dm2 and M1 in Neandertals, it did not among H. sapiens groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm several of the results obtained by a similar study of upper dm2/M1 (dm(2)/M(1)), but there are differences as well. Neandertaldm2/M1 shapes are less derived than those of the dm(2)/M(1). Such differences may support previous studies, which have suggested that different developmental and/or epigenetic factors affect the upper and lower dentitions.
Authors: Kathleen S Paul; Christopher M Stojanowski; Toby Hughes; Alan H Brook; Grant C Townsend Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 4.141
Authors: Christopher Woods; Christianne Fernee; Martin Browne; Sonia Zakrzewski; Alexander Dickinson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 3.240