IMPORTANCE: Based on the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial exclusion criteria, patients with T1N0 or T2N0 breast cancer with 1 or 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are recommended to undergo axillary lymph node dissection if extranodal extension (ENE) is present. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of ENE size on residual axillary nodal burden, disease recurrence, and survival in patients meeting Z0011 criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, at a single tertiary cancer center. Patients had T1 or T2 breast cancer with 1 or 2 positive SLNs. The ENE was classified as 2 mm or smaller or as larger than 2 mm. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Nodal burden, disease recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 208 patients, 149 (71.6%) had no ENE, 21 (10.1%) had ENE 2 mm or smaller, and 38 (18.3%) had ENE larger than 2 mm on SLN dissection. The median follow-up time was 60 months (range, 1-158 months). The mean (SD) total number of positive lymph nodes differed significantly for the group with no ENE (1.72 [1.39]) vs the group with ENE 2 mm or smaller (3.22 [2.09]; P < .001) and vs the group with ENE larger than 2 mm (4.26 [5.01]; P < .001). Similar patterns were observed for mean (SD) nonsentinel lymph node metastases: 0.48 (1.30) for no ENE vs 1.91 (2.07) with ENE 2 mm or smaller (P = .02) and vs 2.95 (4.95) with ENE larger than 2 mm (P < .001). For the group without ENE vs the group with ENE 2 mm or smaller, there were no significant differences in recurrence (distant recurrence, 4 patients [2.7%] vs 1 patient [4.8%], respectively; P = .62) or in mortality (18 patients [12.1%] vs 4 patients [19.1%], respectively; P = .48). For the group without ENE vs the group with ENE larger than 2 mm, there were no significant differences in recurrence (distant recurrence, 4 patients [2.7%] vs 4 patients [10.5%], respectively; P = .19) or in mortality (18 patients [12.1%] vs 9 patients [23.7%], respectively; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Presence of ENE on SLN dissection is associated with N2 disease. Despite increased nodal burden, patients with 1 or 2 positive SLNs and ENE 2 mm or smaller demonstrated recurrence and survival rates similar to those of patients without ENE. Reporting of ENE size should be standardized and required.
IMPORTANCE: Based on the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial exclusion criteria, patients with T1N0 or T2N0 breast cancer with 1 or 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are recommended to undergo axillary lymph node dissection if extranodal extension (ENE) is present. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of ENE size on residual axillary nodal burden, disease recurrence, and survival in patients meeting Z0011 criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, at a single tertiary cancer center. Patients had T1 or T2 breast cancer with 1 or 2 positive SLNs. The ENE was classified as 2 mm or smaller or as larger than 2 mm. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Nodal burden, disease recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 208 patients, 149 (71.6%) had no ENE, 21 (10.1%) had ENE 2 mm or smaller, and 38 (18.3%) had ENE larger than 2 mm on SLN dissection. The median follow-up time was 60 months (range, 1-158 months). The mean (SD) total number of positive lymph nodes differed significantly for the group with no ENE (1.72 [1.39]) vs the group with ENE 2 mm or smaller (3.22 [2.09]; P < .001) and vs the group with ENE larger than 2 mm (4.26 [5.01]; P < .001). Similar patterns were observed for mean (SD) nonsentinel lymph node metastases: 0.48 (1.30) for no ENE vs 1.91 (2.07) with ENE 2 mm or smaller (P = .02) and vs 2.95 (4.95) with ENE larger than 2 mm (P < .001). For the group without ENE vs the group with ENE 2 mm or smaller, there were no significant differences in recurrence (distant recurrence, 4 patients [2.7%] vs 1 patient [4.8%], respectively; P = .62) or in mortality (18 patients [12.1%] vs 4 patients [19.1%], respectively; P = .48). For the group without ENE vs the group with ENE larger than 2 mm, there were no significant differences in recurrence (distant recurrence, 4 patients [2.7%] vs 4 patients [10.5%], respectively; P = .19) or in mortality (18 patients [12.1%] vs 9 patients [23.7%], respectively; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Presence of ENE on SLN dissection is associated with N2 disease. Despite increased nodal burden, patients with 1 or 2 positive SLNs and ENE 2 mm or smaller demonstrated recurrence and survival rates similar to those of patients without ENE. Reporting of ENE size should be standardized and required.
Authors: T Reimer; A Stachs; V Nekljudova; S Loibl; S Hartmann; K Wolter; G Hildebrandt; B Gerber Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Andrea V Barrio; Stephanie Downs-Canner; Marcia Edelweiss; Kimberly J Van Zee; Hiram S Cody; Mary L Gemignani; Melissa L Pilewskie; George Plitas; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Laurie Kirstein; Deborah Capko; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Eduardo Camargo Millen; Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante; Felipe Zerwes; Guilherme Novita; Alessandra Borba Anton de Souza; João Henrique Penna Reis; Helio Rubens de Oliveira Filho; Luciana Naíra de B L Limongi; Barbara Pace Silva de Assis Carvalho; Adriana Magalhães de Oliveira Freitas; Monica Travassos Jourdan; Vilmar Marques de Oliveira; Ruffo Freitas-Junior Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Brian J Gebhardt; Joel Thomas; Zachary D Horne; Colin E Champ; Daniel J Farrugia; Emilia Diego; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Sushil Beriwal Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-04-24
Authors: A Reddy; Nita S Nair; Smruti Mokal; V Parmar; T Shet; R Pathak; G Chitkara; P Thakkar; S Joshi; R A Badwe Journal: Indian J Surg Oncol Date: 2021-03-02