Literature DB >> 26330988

Evaluation of the Multifaceted and Complex Health Strategies: A Guide to Program Managers.

Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava1, Prateek Saurabh Shrivastava1, Jegadeesh Ramasamy1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26330988      PMCID: PMC4542330          DOI: 10.4103/2008-7802.162459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prev Med        ISSN: 2008-7802


× No keyword cloud information.
DEAR EDITOR, The program managers from all the nations have planned and implemented various strategies to ensure provision of quality assured health care services to all.[1] However, as most of these health services are extremely complex and are built on the basis of thorough situation analysis, there is a crucial need to evaluate these strategies so that the policies can be subsequently modified.[2] In general, evaluation refers to the comprehensive process by which observed outcomes can be compared with the pre-decided targets.[34] In the modern era, based on the findings of a holistic evaluation process, decisions pertaining to the financial grant for a specific program is made.[45] However, to enhance the credibility of an evaluation, the steps should be uniform, pre-defined, clear, and flexible enough to be customized based on local needs.[6] Ideally the evaluation process comprises of the following steps, namely identifying what has to be evaluated (structure or process or outcome evaluation); setting standards and criteria to assess accomplishment of pre-decided targets; devising methodology to perform evaluation; data collection; systematic analysis and interpretation of data; followed by implementation of corrective measures; and finally performing re-evaluation to assess the results of the remedial steps.[278] Any evaluation process should explore six different facets of a health strategy, namely evaluation of relevance, adequacy, accessibility, efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency.[2910] In fact, the program evaluation component has to be designed even prior to the start of any health strategy.[5] In addition, the evaluation process should not be restricted to the health care providers, but should also cover the needs of individuals or communities, so that health indicators can be improved as a whole.[11] In conclusion, evaluation of health strategy is a complex and an integral component of planning and successfully implementing a health scheme. Thus, program managers should realize its importance and give due attention to it in order to ensure improvement in the well-being of the masses.
  9 in total

1.  Framework for program evaluation in public health.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  1999-09-17

2.  A scan of program evaluation at the Houston Department of Health and Human Services.

Authors:  Janet Aikins; Linda Lloyd; Isaac Joyner
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  The Year is Over, Now What? The Annual Program Evaluation.

Authors:  Deborah Simpson; Monica Lypson
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-09

4.  Public health surveillance of diabetes in the United States.

Authors:  Jay Desai; Linda Geiss; Qaiser Mukhtar; Todd Harwell; Stephanie Benjamin; Ronny Bell; Ed Tierney
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2003-11

5.  Building Bridges Between Structural and Program Evaluation Approaches to Evaluating Policy.

Authors:  James J Heckman
Journal:  J Econ Lit       Date:  2010-06-01

6.  Evaluation of health research: measuring costs and socioeconomic effects.

Authors:  Kerstin Roback; Koustuv Dalal; Per Carlsson
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2011-10

7.  The common threads in program evaluation.

Authors:  William R Shadish
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Program evaluation and chronic diseases: methods, approaches, and implications for public health.

Authors:  Leonard Jack; Qaiser Mukhtar; Maurice Martin; Mark Rivera; S René Lavinghouze; Jan Jernigan; Paul Z Siegel; Gregory Heath; Dara Murphy
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  The Annual African American Conference on Diabetes: evolving program evaluation with evolving program implementation.

Authors:  Jacquelyn M Houston; Maurice Martin; Joel E Williams; Rhonda L Hill
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.