| Literature DB >> 26330883 |
Sudipta Kumar Mohanty1, Mallappa Kumara Swamy2, Sushil Kumar Middha3, Lokesh Prakash2, Balasubramanya Subbanarashiman4, Anuradha Maniyam1.
Abstract
Leptadenia reticulata was reported to be used for several medicinal purposes. The present study was undertaken to evaluate anti-inflammatory, analgesic and lipid peroxidation inhibition activities of L. reticulata. The anti-inflammatory assay was performed by λ-carrageenan and formalin induced paw edema test. Pro inflammatory mediators (IL2, IL6, TNF-α) in serum of treated and control organism were analyzed by quantitative ELISA. Lipid peroxidation inhibition was measured by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay. Analysis of the most active fraction revealed the presence of one phenolic compound (p-coumaric acid), two flavonoids (rutin and quercetin) which also determined quantitatively. The ethyl acetate fraction at 600 mg/Kg significantly inhibited λ-carrageenan and formalin induced paw edema by 60.59% and 59.24% respectively. Notable reduction in percentage of writhing (76.25%), induced by acetic acid signifies the potent analgesic activity. Lower level of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α) in serum at the 4(th) hour of λ-Carrageenan injection indicated the inhibition of cyclooxigenase-2 (Cox-2), Nitric oxide (NO) and release of prostaglandin to prevent inflammation. The study also demonstrated the decrease in malonaldehyde (MDA) concentration which revealed the lipid peroxidation inhibition potential of the plant. Our finding provides evidence for potent biological activities in tested model which is supported by its characterized bioactive compounds and ethnomedicinal relevance.Entities:
Keywords: Analgesic activity; Anti-inflammatory activity; Leptadenia reticulate; Lipid peroxidation inhibition; Pro-inflammatory cytokines
Year: 2015 PMID: 26330883 PMCID: PMC4518123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Effect of different extract of L. reticulata on λ-Carageenan Induced Paw edema test
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/Kg) | 0 h | 1 h | 2 h | 4 h | 1 h | 2 h | 4 h |
| Control | 0.65 ± 0.12 | 1.21 ± 0.76 | 1.64 ± 0.21 | 2.38 ± 0.15 | - | - | - |
| EA(400) | 0.55 ± 0.34 | 1.06 ± 0.65 | 1.11 ± 0.65 | 1.43 ± 0.43 | 12 ± 0.12c | 32 ± 0.27c | 40 ± 0.32c |
| EA(600) | 0.51 ± 0.23 | 0.89 ± 0.11 | 0.93 ± 0.77 | 0.97 ± 0.21 | 26 ± 0.21b | 43 ± 0.31b | 59 ± 0.41b |
| Meth(400) | 0.61 ± 0.54 | 1.16 ± 0.33 | 1.45 ± 0.19 | 2.12 ± 0.32 | 4 ± 0.02d | 12 ± 0.12d | 11 ± 0.15d |
| Meth(600) | 0.63 ± 0.41 | 1.13 ± 0.56 | 1.42 ± 0.16 | 2.05 ± 0.76 | 7 ± 0.04d | 13 ± 0.11d | 14 ± 0.17d |
| Water(400) | 0.62 ± 0.32 | 1.16 ± 0.85 | 1.54 ± 0.13 | 2.14 ± 0.44 | 4 ± 0.03d | 6 ± 0.03e | 10 ± 0.12d |
| Water(600) | 0.64 ± 0.22 | 1.15 ± 0.29 | 1.57 ± 0.29 | 2.20 ± 0.55 | 5 ± 0.06d | 4 ± 0.06e | 8 ± 0.06e |
| Diclofenac | 0.46 ± 0.15 | 0.62 ± 0.19 | 0.63 ± 0.22 | 0.66 ± 0.39 | 49 ± 0.24a | 62 ± 0.62a | 72 ± 0.65a |
F-value 291.50
Note: The Values within each column represent, Mean ± SE followed by same letters in superscript are not significantly different from each other (P< 0.0001). Data analysed by GLM procedure with Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) using SAS®.
at α = 0.05.
Effect of different extract of L. reticulata on Formalin induced Paw edema test.
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/Kg) | 0 h | 1 h | 2 h | 4 h | 1 h | 2 h | 4 h |
| Control | 0.66±0.87 | 1.24±0.51 | 1.62±0.22 | 2.36±0.88 | - | - | - |
| EA (400) | 0.56±0.76 | 1.02 ±0.49 | 1.13±0.91 | 1.41 ±0.72 | 18±0.11c | 30±0.2c | 40±0.21c |
| EA (600) | 0.55±0.38 | 0.82 ±0.97 | 0.87 ±0.18 | 0.93±0.17 | 33.87±0.21b | 46.29±0.3b | 60.59±0.43b |
| Meth(400) | 0.63±0.51 | 1.14 ±0.88 | 1.40±0.19 | 1.86±0.15 | 8±0.19e | 13.58±0.1d | 21.18±0.19e |
| Meth(600) | 0.61±0.44 | 1.09 ±0.71 | 1.31 ±0.23 | 1.58 ±0.63 | 12.09±0.1d | 19.13±0.2d | 33.05±0.23cd |
| Water(400) | 0.64±0.57 | 1.18 ±0.73 | 1.51 ±0.92 | 2.15 ±0.75 | 5±0.12e | 7±0.18e | 9±0.16f |
| Water(600) | 0.63±0.97 | 1.17 ±0.61 | 1.56±0.84 | 2.19 ±0.95 | 6±0.1e | 4±0.15e | 7±0.13f |
| Diclofenac | 0.49±0.66 | 0.60±0.11 | 0.65±0.66 | 0.68±0.59 | 52±0.26a | 60±0.32a | 71±0.4a |
F-value 323.85
Note: The Values within each column represent, Mean ± SE followed by same letters in superscript are not significantly different from each other (P< 0.0001). Data analysed by GLM procedure with Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) using SAS®.
at α = 0.05
Figure 1Effect of different extract of L. reticulata at 400 mg, 600 mg and Diclofenac on (A) IL2 Concentration (B) IL6 Concentration.
Figure 2Effect of different extract of L. reticulata at 400 mg, 600 mg and Diclofenac on TNF-α Concentration.
Effect of different extract of L. reticulata on acetic acid induced writhing test
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Acetic Acid(1% V/V) | 44±6.20a | 0 |
| Standard | Diclofenac Sodium(50) | 6.28±2.40f | 85.72±2.44a |
| EA | 400 | 18.72±1.46d | 57.45±1.92d |
| EA | 600 | 10.45±1.23e | 76.25±1.73b |
| Methanol | 400 | 26.37±2.10c | 40.06±1.23e |
| Methanol | 600 | 17.63±1.79d | 59.93±2.12c |
| Water | 400 | 31.27±2.56b | 28.93±1.46f |
| Water | 600 | 26.44±2.63c | 39.90±1.48e |
F-value 338.79
Note: The Values within each column represent, Mean ± SE followed by same letters in superscript are not significantly different from each other (P< 0.0001). Data analysed by GLM procedure with Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) using SAS®.
at α = 0.05
Figure 3Lipid peroxidation activities of various extract of L. reticulata.
Figure 4HPLC Chromatogram of Ethyl acetate extract of L. reticulata