Literature DB >> 26330798

Internet self-diagnosis in hand surgery.

Michiel G J S Hageman1, Jade Anderson1, Robin Blok1, Jeroen K J Bossen1, David Ring1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some Internet sites have programs that attempt to help patients find their diagnosis based on symptoms. This study tested the null hypothesis that there are no factors associated with correspondence between online diagnosis and the hand surgeon's diagnosis in an outpatient hand and upper extremity surgeons' office.
METHODS: Eighty-six outpatients were prospectively enrolled and used WebMD® symptom checker to guess their diagnosis. We collected demographic information, hours spent on the Internet per week, and the following questionnaires: Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (C-ESD).
RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of online diagnoses matched the final diagnosis of the hand surgeon. Factors associated with an online diagnosis corresponding to the hand surgeon's diagnosis included sex (women) and patients who studied their symptoms online prior to the visit. The best multivariable model included sex, more years of education, and prior use of the Internet to research their medical condition and explained 15 % of the variation in correspondence of diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of online diagnoses for hand and upper extremity conditions do not correspond with the diagnosis of the treating hand surgeon. Psychological factors do not influence the correspondence of online diagnosis with the hand surgeon's diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Online medical self-diagnosis; Orthopedic setting; PSEQ

Year:  2015        PMID: 26330798      PMCID: PMC4551618          DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9707-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  12 in total

1.  The quality of health information on the internet.

Authors:  Gretchen P Purcell; Petra Wilson; Tony Delamothe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

2.  Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them.

Authors:  Shelia R Cotten; Sipi S Gupta
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Googling for a diagnosis--use of Google as a diagnostic aid: internet based study.

Authors:  Hangwi Tang; Jennifer Hwee Kwoon Ng
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-11-10

4.  Relationship of Internet health information use with patient behavior and self-efficacy: experiences of newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.

Authors:  Sarah Bauerle Bass; Sheryl Burt Ruzek; Thomas F Gordon; Linda Fleisher; Nancy McKeown-Conn; Dirk Moore
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006-03

5.  The Internet as a diagnostic aid: the patients' perspective.

Authors:  G Schembri; P Schober
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.359

Review 6.  Psychosocial aspects of disabling musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Vranceanu; Arthur Barsky; David Ring
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  'Doctor Google' ending the diagnostic odyssey in lysosomal storage disorders: parents using internet search engines as an efficient diagnostic strategy in rare diseases.

Authors:  Machtelt G Bouwman; Quirine G A Teunissen; Frits A Wijburg; Gabor E Linthorst
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 8.  Promoting women's health via the World Wide Web.

Authors:  M J Hern; T Weitkamp; P J Hillard; J Trigg; R Guard
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec

9.  Contribution of kinesophobia and catastrophic thinking to upper-extremity-specific disability.

Authors:  Soumen Das De; Ana-Maria Vranceanu; David C Ring
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Laurence Baker; Todd H Wagner; Sara Singer; M Kate Bundorf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What are the Implications of Excessive Internet Searches for Medical Information by Orthopaedic Patients?

Authors:  Tom J Crijns
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Symptom Checker Apps in Primary Health Care (CHECK.APP): Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Anna-Jasmin Wetzel; Roland Koch; Christine Preiser; Regina Müller; Malte Klemmt; Robert Ranisch; Hans-Jörg Ehni; Urban Wiesing; Monika A Rieger; Tanja Henking; Stefanie Joos
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 3.  The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review.

Authors:  William Wallace; Calvin Chan; Swathikan Chidambaram; Lydia Hanna; Fahad Mujtaba Iqbal; Amish Acharya; Pasha Normahani; Hutan Ashrafian; Sheraz R Markar; Viknesh Sounderajah; Ara Darzi
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-08-17

4.  A Novel Insight Into the Challenges of Diagnosing Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Using Web-Based Symptom Checkers.

Authors:  Benjamin Marshall Davies; Colin Fraser Munro; Mark Rn Kotter
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Patient Perspectives on the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Symptom Checker: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Authors:  Ashley N D Meyer; Traber D Giardina; Christiane Spitzmueller; Umber Shahid; Taylor M T Scott; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Development and Usability Testing of a Web-Based and Therapist-Assisted Coping Skills Program for Managing Psychosocial Problems in Individuals With Hand and Upper Limb Injuries: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Folarin Omoniyi Babatunde; Joy MacDermid; Ruby Grewal; Luciana Macedo; Mike Szekeres
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2020-05-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.