Literature DB >> 26330452

An international comparison of costs of end-of-life care for advanced lung cancer patients using health administrative data.

Karen E Bremner1, Murray D Krahn2, Joan L Warren3, Jeffrey S Hoch4, Michael J Barrett5, Ning Liu6, Lisa Barbera7, K Robin Yabroff3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patterns of end-of-life cancer care differ in Canada and the United States; yet little is known about differences in service-specific and overall costs. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare end-of-life costs in Ontario, Canada, and the United States, using administrative health data.
DESIGN: Advanced-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer patients who died from cancer at age ⩾ 65.5 years in 2001-2005 were selected from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database (N = 16,858) and the Ontario Cancer Registry (N = 8643). We estimated total and service-specific costs (2009 US dollars) in each of the last 6 months of life from the public payer perspectives for short-term and long-term survivors (lived < 180 and ⩾ 180 days post-diagnosis, respectively). Services were defined for comparisons between systems.
RESULTS: Mean monthly costs increased as death approached, were higher in short-term than long-term survivors, and were generally higher in the United States than in Ontario until the month before death, when they were similar (long-term survivors: US$10,464 and US$10,094 (p = 0.53), short-term survivors US$14,455 and US$12,836 (p = 0.11), in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare and Ontario, respectively). Costs for Medicare hospice and Ontario's palliative care components were similar and increased closer to death. Inpatient hospitalization was the main cost driver with similar costs in both cohorts, despite lower utilization in the United States. The compositions of many services and costs differed.
CONCLUSION: Costs for nonsmall cell lung cancer patients were slightly higher in the United States than Ontario until 1 month before death. Administrative data allow exploration and international comparisons of reimbursement policies, health-care delivery, and costs at the end of life.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Terminal care; comparative study; costs and cost analysis; health services; nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26330452     DOI: 10.1177/0269216315596505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  14 in total

1.  Patterns of Care and Costs for Older Patients With Colorectal Cancer at the End of Life: Descriptive Study of the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Karen E Bremner; K Robin Yabroff; Diarmuid Coughlan; Ning Liu; Christopher Zeruto; Joan L Warren; Claire de Oliveira; Angela B Mariotto; Clara Lam; Michael J Barrett; Kelvin K-W Chan; Jeffrey S Hoch; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-10-24

2.  The Devoted Grandma: Is a Social Indication for TAVR Acceptable?

Authors:  Andrea J Carpenter; William M Novick; Robert M Sade
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Hospital, local palliative care network and public health: how do they involve terminally ill patients?

Authors:  Gianlorenzo Scaccabarozzi; Fabrizio Limonta; Emanuele Amodio
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  End-of-life cost and its determinants for cancer patients in urban China: a population-based retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhong Li; Zijing Pan; Liang Zhang; Ruibo He; Shan Jiang; Chengzhong Xu; Fangfang Lu; Pei Zhang; Boyang Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Sociodemographic and clinical factors for non-hospital deaths among cancer patients: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Qingyuan Zhuang; Zheng Yi Lau; Whee Sze Ong; Grace Meijuan Yang; Kelvin Bryan Tan; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Ting Hway Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The impact of concordance with a lung cancer diagnosis pathway guideline on treatment access in patients with stage IV lung cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Pattison; Luke Jeagal; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Andrew Pierre; Laura Donahoe; Jonathan Yeung; Gail Darling; Marcelo Cypel; Marc De Perrot; Tom Waddell; Shaf Keshavjee; Kasia Czarnecka-Kujawa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Validity of breast, lung and colorectal cancer diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Gianni Giovannini; Diego Serraino; Mario Fusco; Alessandro Montedori
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Health Care Utilization Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries With Coexisting Dementia and Cancer.

Authors:  Satish K Kedia; Prachi P Chavan; Sarah E Boop; Xinhua Yu
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2017-01-17

10.  Accuracy of administrative databases in detecting primary breast cancer diagnoses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Alessandro Montedori; Diego Serraino; Massimiliano Orso; Gianni Giovannini; Valeria Scotti; Annalisa Granata; Francesco Cozzolino; Mario Fusco; Ettore Bidoli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.