| Literature DB >> 26330313 |
Krzysztof Klimaszewski1, Ewa Pacholik1, Adam Snopek2.
Abstract
The study was aimed to evaluate the selected improvements of nature restoration in a depleted gravel pit. The study site consisted of four water reservoirs of different shapes and sizes, flooded after the gravel extraction ended. Ecological succession monitoring, conducted by the Warsaw University of Life Sciences students associated in the Student Scientific Association of Animal Sciences Faculty since the completion of mining, have focused on amphibians. A twofold approach upheld amphibian species population dynamics, as well as selected habitat elements. The restoration practices dedicated to habitat conditions enhancing have been proved to be definitely effective and useful for similar sites.Entities:
Keywords: Amphibians; Gravel pit; Habitat quality indexes; Nature restoration; Post-mining terrains; Reclamation practices
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26330313 PMCID: PMC5010623 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5279-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Water reservoir 3A with newly planted reed bed, May 2012 (Photo: A. Snopek)
Fig. 2The study area on a map created using QGIS 2.6.1 (Pacholik 2014, modified)
Occurrence of selected amphibian species in particular water reservoirs
| 1A | 1B | 2 | 3A | 3B | 3C | 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
|
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
0, lack of individuals; 1, 1–10 individuals; 2, over 100 individuals (Pacholik and Klimaszewski 2013, modified)
Habitat validation based on habitat quality index values
| 1A | 1B | 2 | 3A | 3B | 3C | 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| U1 | U1 | FV | U1 | U1 | FV | FV |
|
| U2 | U2 | FV | U1 | U1 | FV | FV |
|
| FV | FV | FV | U1 | FV | FV | FV |
|
| U1 | FV | FV | FV | FV | FV | FV |
|
| U1 | U2 | FV | FV | FV | FV | FV |
|
| FV | FV | FV | FV | FV | FV | FV |
|
| U1 | U2 | FV | FV | FV | FV | FV |
|
| U1 | U1 | U1 | U1 | U1 | U1 | U1 |
|
| FV | FV | FV | FV | FV | FV | FV |
|
| FV | U1 | FV | FV | FV | FV | FV |
FV—proper condition, U1—unsatisfactory condition, U2—bad condition
Fig. 3Occurrence of amphibian species in former Sitno gravel pit during three seasons; 0, lack of individuals; 1, 1–10 individuals; 2, 10–100 individuals; 3, 100–300 individuals; 4, over 300 individuals
Fig. 4Water reservoir 3C (photo: E. Pacholik)
Fig. 5Water reservoir 2 (Photo: E. Pacholik)
Fig. 6Water reservoir 1A (photo: E. Pacholik)