Rong Tan1, Ying Xiao2, Qi Tang1, Ying Zhang1, Hui Chen3, Xiancheng Fan4. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, The First Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, Hunan, PR China. 2. Department of Ultrasonography, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Xiangya Road 141, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, PR China. Electronic address: fuyujie30@163.com. 3. Department of Pathology, The First Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, Hunan, PR China. 4. Department of Breast Surgery, the First Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, Hunan, PR China.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of Micropure Imaging (MI) in breast lesions differentiation by comparison with B-mode ultrasonography (B-US) and Doppler ultrasonography (DU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 135 consecutive patients (all females) with 135 suspicious lesions were examined and skin marked by MI before mammotome biopsies. All patients (age range, 20-86 years; mean age, 42.5 ± 15.6 years) were the first onset, not in the pregnancy or lactation and had no history of radiation or chemotherapy. The maximum diameter of lesions ranged from 0.2 to 9.6 cm (average 1.98 ± 1.3 cm). Their final diagnoses were obtained by histologic examination. The study protocol was approved by the hospital review board; each patient gave written informed consent. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five breast lesions were classified into 90 nonmalignant and 45 malignant types. To 86 breast lesions with microcalcification, MI showed more microcalcification and coincided better with pathology results than B-US did (P < .05). The specificity of MI was higher than that of B-US and DU; the sensitivity of DU was significantly higher than that of B-US and MI (P < .001). By combining B-US, DU, and MI, the detection accuracy was 86.7%. Receiver-operator characteristic curves showed the area under the curve of B-US, DU, and MI was 0.865, 0.934, and 0.923(P = .000), respectively. Moreover, the interobserver agreements of MI were the highest, 0.922 (observer 1 vs. observer 2), 0.866 (observer 1 vs. observer 3), and 0.916 (observer 2 vs. observer 3). CONCLUSIONS: MI as an adjunct ultrasound modality holds some promise in locating and differentiating breast lesions.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of Micropure Imaging (MI) in breast lesions differentiation by comparison with B-mode ultrasonography (B-US) and Doppler ultrasonography (DU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 135 consecutive patients (all females) with 135 suspicious lesions were examined and skin marked by MI before mammotome biopsies. All patients (age range, 20-86 years; mean age, 42.5 ± 15.6 years) were the first onset, not in the pregnancy or lactation and had no history of radiation or chemotherapy. The maximum diameter of lesions ranged from 0.2 to 9.6 cm (average 1.98 ± 1.3 cm). Their final diagnoses were obtained by histologic examination. The study protocol was approved by the hospital review board; each patient gave written informed consent. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five breast lesions were classified into 90 nonmalignant and 45 malignant types. To 86 breast lesions with microcalcification, MI showed more microcalcification and coincided better with pathology results than B-US did (P < .05). The specificity of MI was higher than that of B-US and DU; the sensitivity of DU was significantly higher than that of B-US and MI (P < .001). By combining B-US, DU, and MI, the detection accuracy was 86.7%. Receiver-operator characteristic curves showed the area under the curve of B-US, DU, and MI was 0.865, 0.934, and 0.923(P = .000), respectively. Moreover, the interobserver agreements of MI were the highest, 0.922 (observer 1 vs. observer 2), 0.866 (observer 1 vs. observer 3), and 0.916 (observer 2 vs. observer 3). CONCLUSIONS: MI as an adjunct ultrasound modality holds some promise in locating and differentiating breast lesions.